New Forest Owners – Small-Scale Forestry and Changes in Forest Ownership

Chapter
Part of the World Forests book series (WFSE, volume 9)

Abstract

Families and individuals own 82% of the European private forest area (data derived from 11 countries). These forests are typically small in scale and are increasing in number as a result of fragmentation. Coincident with these developments is a change in the ownership structure. In the past owners were typically farmers who lived close to their forest, and who relied on their forests for income. In recent decades, the number of non-farmer owners has increased and many now live in urban areas. The new owners tend not to be economically dependent on their forests, nor have timber production as a primary goal, and are instead likely to hold amenity and conservation objectives. This trend, coupled with the increasing fragmentation of small-scale forests, is likely to have negative consequences for timber supply and the sustainable management of these forests. The changing objectives of owners may, on the other hand, have positive impacts on landscape, nature conservation and recreation. However, these may be counteracted by increasing fragmentation.

Keywords

Forest Owner Timber Production Private Forest Total Forest Area Private Forest Owner 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Anon (2006) Background information. Workshop on pan-European recommendations for afforestation and reforestation in the context of UNFCCC. http://www.mcpfe.org/documents/meetings/2006/unf. Accessed 28 Jan 2009
  2. Bauer J, Kniivilä M, Schmithüsen F (2004) Forest legislation in Europe: how 23 countries approach the obligation to reforest, public access and use of non-wood forest products. FAO, Geneva Timber and Forest Discussion Paper 37, FAO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  3. Best C (2002) America’s private forest – challenges for conservation. J Forest 100(3):14–17Google Scholar
  4. Boon TE, Meilby H, Thorsen BJ (2004) An empirically based typology of private forest owners in Denmark: improving communication between authorities and owners. Scand J Forest Res 19(4):45–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Church A, Ravenscroft N (2008) Landowner responses to financial incentive schemes for recreational access to woodlands in South East England. Land Use Policy 25:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. FAO (2004) Terms and definitions. FRA-2005. FRA working paper 73, FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  7. FAO (2005) Global forest resource assessment. Main Report. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  8. Farrelly N (2007) The farm forest resource in Ireland: opportunities and challenges. Small-scale Forestry 6(1):49–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harrison S, Herbohn J, Niskanen A (2002) Non-industrial, smallholder, small-scale and family forestry: what’s in a name? Small-scale Forest Econ Manage Policy 1(1):1–11Google Scholar
  10. Helms JA (1998) The dictionary of forestry. Society of American Foresters and CABI Publishing, BethesdaGoogle Scholar
  11. Herbohn J (2006) Small-scale forestry: is it simply a smaller version of industrial (large-scale) multiple use forestry? In: Wall S (ed) Small-scale forestry and rural development, the intersection of ecosystems, economics and society. Proceedings IUFRO 3.08 Conference, Galway, Ireland. COFORD and GMIT, Ireland, pp 158–163Google Scholar
  12. Hirsch F, Korotkov A, Wilnhammer M (2007) Private forest ownership in Europe. Unasylva 58:3–25Google Scholar
  13. Hogl K, Pregernig M, Weiss G (2005) What is new about forest owners? A typology of private forest ownership in Austria. Small-scale Forest Econ Manage Policy 4(3):352–342Google Scholar
  14. Hugosson M, Ingermarson F (2004) Objectives and motivations of small-scale forest owners; modelling and qualitative assessment. Silva Fenn 38(2):271–231Google Scholar
  15. Hyttinen P (2001) Prospects for small-scale forestry in Europe. In: Niskanen A, Väyrynen J (eds) Economic sustainability of small-scale forestry. EFI proceedings 36. EFI, Joensuu, pp 21–27Google Scholar
  16. Hyttinen P (2004) Small-scale forestry. In: Burley J, Evans J, Youngquist J (eds) Encyclopedia of forest sciences. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 663–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hyttinen P, Ottitsch A, Pelli A et al (eds) (1999) Forest related resources, industries, services and know-how in the border regions of the European Union. EFI working paper 21. EFI, JoensuuGoogle Scholar
  18. Jennings SM, van Putten IE (2006) Typology of non-industrial private forest owners in Tasmania. Small-scale Forest Econ Manage Policy 5(1):37–56Google Scholar
  19. Jylhä L (2007) Forest management associations – value from cooperation for forest owners. Unasylva 58:44–47Google Scholar
  20. Karppinen H (1998) Values and objectives of non-industrial private forest owners in Finland. Silva Fenn 32(1):43–59Google Scholar
  21. Kuuluvainen J, Karppinen H, Ovaskainen V (1996) Landowner objectives and non-industrial private timber supply. Forest Sci 42(3):300–309Google Scholar
  22. Kvarda ME (2004) Non-agricultural forest owners’ in Austria – a new type of ownership. Forest Policy Econ 6:459–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lillandt M (2001) Forest management association – a major tool to promote economic sustainability of family forestry. In: Niskanen A, Väyrynen J (eds) Economic sustainability of small-scale forestry. EFI proceedings 36. EFI, Joensuu, pp 93–100Google Scholar
  24. Luloff A, Finley J, Melbye J (2000) Social issues and impacts associated with land parcelisation. In: DeCoster D (ed) Proceedings of forestry fragmentation 2000: sustaining private forests in the 21st century. Sampson Group, Alexandria, pp 183–190Google Scholar
  25. Marty TD, Kurtz WB, Gramann JH (1988) PNIF owner attitudes in the Midwest: a case study in Missouri and Wisconsin. North J Appl For 5(3):194–197Google Scholar
  26. Mizaraite D, Mizaras S (2005) The formation of small-scale forestry in countries with economy in transition: observations from Lithuania. Small-scale Forest Econ Manage Policy 4(4):437–450Google Scholar
  27. Ní Dhubháin Á, Gallagher R, Whelton A, Wiley S (2005) Forest sector entrepreneurship in Europe: Ireland. Acta Silvatica Lignaria Hungarica Special Ed 1:347–375Google Scholar
  28. Ní Dhubháin Á, Greene R (2009) How much do Irish private forest owners know about forestry? Small-scale For. doi: doi: 10.1007/s11842-009-9081-7 Google Scholar
  29. Ní Dhubháin Á, Wall S (1999) The new owners of small private forests in Ireland. J Forest 97(6):28–33Google Scholar
  30. Ripatti P (1996) Factors affecting partitioning of private forest holdings in Finland. A logit analysis. Acta Forestalia Fennica 252:1–84Google Scholar
  31. Ripatti P, Järveläinen VP (1997) Forecasting structural changes in non-industrial private forest ownership in Finland. Scand Forest Econ 36:215–230Google Scholar
  32. Schmithüsen F, Hirsch F (2008) Private forest ownership in Europe-advance draft. Geneva timber and forest discussion paper 49. FAO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  33. Schraml U (2004) Rise and fall of programmatic approaches in German small-scale forest owner research. In: International symposium on contributions of family-farm enterprises to sustainable rural development, Proceedings, Freiburger Forstliche Forschung, Berichte, Heft 51, Freiburg, pp 80–93Google Scholar
  34. Sekot W (2001) Analysis of profitability of small-scale farm forestry (SSFF) by means of a forest accountancy data network – Austrian experiences and results. In: Niskanen A, Väyrynen J (eds) Economic sustainability of small-scale forestry. EFI proceedings 36. EFI, Joensuu, pp 215–226Google Scholar
  35. Skov-og Naturstyrelsen (1993) Vejledning om naturbeskyttelsesloven – udgivet 1993. Kapitel 10.7 Særligt om privatejede skoveGoogle Scholar
  36. Toivonen R, Järvinen E, Lindross K, Rämö A (2005) The challenge of information service development for private forest owners: the Estonia and Finland cases. Small-scale Forest Econ Manage Policy 4(4):451–470Google Scholar
  37. Uliczka H, Angelstam P, Gunnar J, Anders B (2004) Non-industrial private forest owners’ knowledge of and attitudes towards nature conservation. Scand J Forest Res 19(3):274–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Van der Ploeg JD, Wiersum KF (1996) Styles of forest management by small forest owners, characteristics and scope for rural development. In: Glück P, Weiss G (eds) Forestry in the context of rural development: future research needs. EFI proceedings 15. EFI, Joensuu, pp 45–57Google Scholar
  39. Wiersum KF, Elands BHM, O’Leary T (2004) Landowners’ perspectives on the future of rural Europe: consequences for farm forestry. In: International symposium on contributions of family-farm enterprises to sustainable rural development, Proceedings, Freiburger Forstliche Forschung, Berichte, Heft 51, Freiburg, pp 105–126Google Scholar
  40. Wiersum KF, Elands BHM, Hoogstra MA (2005) Small-scale forest ownership across Europe: characteristics and future potential. Small-scale Forest Econ Manage Policy 4(1):1–19Google Scholar
  41. Yudelman M, Leaky JM (2000) The graying of farmers. Population reference Bureau. http://www.prb.org/Articles/2000/TheGrayingofFarmers.aspx. Accessed 20 April 2009
  42. Ziegenspeck S, Härdter U, Schraml U (2004) Lifestyles of private forest owners as an indication of social change. Forest Policy Econ 6:447–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V.  2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Agriculture and Food Science Centre, School of Agriculture, Food Science and Veterinary MedicineUCD DublinDublin 4Ireland

Personalised recommendations