Advertisement

Finland: CAPtive Academics – An Examination of the Binary Divide

  • Timo Aarrevaara
  • Ian R. Dobson
  • Elias Pekkola
Chapter
Part of the The Changing Academy – The Changing Academic Profession in International Comparative Perspective book series (CHAC, volume 2)

Abstract

Finland’s March toward universal higher education can be linked initially to Finnish regional policy and later to the development of non-university higher education. The establishment of the polytechnic sector from 1991, with its greater focus on teaching and interaction with “working life” led to a new higher education workforce. This chapter therefore examines the differences and similarities in work and attitudes between academics from each sector. University staff tend to spend more time on research and less time on teaching than their polytechnic counterparts, and had different opinions on matters relating to their personal influence and their perceptions of working conditions. Seniority has an impact on the opinions of junior and senior staff in both sectors, but gender-based differences are small. Some of the opinions expressed by academics are influenced by the long history of universities in society. Finnish polytechnics, however, have much less “history,” and have much more centralized governance arrangements.

Keywords

High Education High Education Institution Academic Work Institutional Manager Regional Innovation System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aarrevaara, T. (2007). Enhancing universities in Finland. The Journal of Finance and Management in Colleges and Universities, 4, 261–292.Google Scholar
  2. Aarrevaara, T., & Hölttä, S. (2007). Massification, steering-by-results and new division of labor. In L. William & U. Teichler (Eds.), The changing conditions for academic work and careers in select countries. Kassel: International Center for Higher education Research Kassel.Google Scholar
  3. Aarrevaara, T., & Hölttä, S. (2008). The changing academic profession in international comparative and quantitative perspective. Report of the international conference on the changing academic profession project, 2008 (RIHE international Seminar Reports no. 12). Hiroshima: Research Institute for Higher Education Hiroshima University.Google Scholar
  4. Aarrevaara, T., & Pekkola, E. (2010). Country report on changing academic profession survey in Finland. Tampere: Tampere University Press. In Finnish.Google Scholar
  5. Aarrevaara, T., Dobson, I. R., & Elander, C. (2009). Brave new world: Higher education reform in Finland. Higher Education Policy and Management, 21(2), 89–106.Google Scholar
  6. CAP Survey (2008). Weighted international data set 22nd July 2009.Google Scholar
  7. Clark, B. R. (1983). The higher education system. Academic organization in cross-national perspectives. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  8. Clark, B. (1987). The Academic Life – Small Worlds, Different Worlds. Princeton: Carnagie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.Google Scholar
  9. Enders, J., & Teichler, U. (1997). A victim of their own success? Employment and working conditions of academic staff in comparative perspective. Higher Education, 34(3), 347–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. FIOH (Finnish Institute of Occupational Health) 2006. Work and health in Finland. Helsinki: FIOH (Finnish Institute of Occupational Health), (Työ ja terveys Suomessa).Google Scholar
  11. Hakala, J. (2009). The future of the academic calling? Junior researcher in the entrepreneurial university. Higher Education, 57(2), 173–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hölttä, S., & Malkki, P. (2000). Response of finnish higher education institutions to the national information society programme. Higher Education Policy, 13, 231–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kogan, M. (2007). Academic Profession and its Interface with Management. In M. Kogan & U. Teichler (Eds.), Key challenges to the academic profession. Paris & Kassel: UNESCO Forum on Higher Education Research and Knowledge and International Center for Higher Education Research INCHER. Werkstattberichte 65. Kassel.Google Scholar
  14. KOTA (2009). Database. Helsinki: Ministry of Education. http://www.kotayksi.csc.fi/.
  15. Light, D. (1974). The structure of the academic profession. Sociology of Education, 74(1), 2–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Locke, W., & Teichler, U. (Eds.). (2007). The changing conditions for academic work and careers in select countries. INCHER. Werkstattberichte 66. Kassel: University of Kassel.Google Scholar
  17. Ministry of Education, Finland (1996). Higher education policy in Finland. Helsinki: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  18. Ministry of Employment and Economy. (2009). The evaluation of the national innovation system. Policy report (The veugelers report). Helsinki: Ministry of Employment and Economy.Google Scholar
  19. Mughul, A., & Pekkola, E. (2009). Internationalisation in higher education policies: A comparative study of Finland and Pakistan. Madrid: ICERI2009 Proceedings.Google Scholar
  20. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2006). Supporting the contribution of higher education institutions to regional development. The Jyväskylä region of Finland. Peer review report by John Goddard, Henry Etzkowitz, Jaana Puukka and Ilkka Virtanen. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  21. Parsons, T., & Platt, G. M. (1973). The American university. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Pekkola, E. (2009a). Academic profession in Finland – Power entity or diversified workforce? Politiikka, 51(4), 268–290. In Finnish.Google Scholar
  23. Pekkola, E. (2009b). New dimensions of internationalisation of universities. Tiedepolitiikka, 3, 58–61. In Finnish.Google Scholar
  24. Pekkola, E. (2010). Is work of young academics rewarding and how does it affect to the attractiveness of academic career? Työelämän tutkimus, 1, 145–159 In Finnish.Google Scholar
  25. Puhakka, A., & Rautapuro, J. (2007). 2007 member survey of the Finnish union of university teachers and researchers. Tieteentekijöiden liitto. In Finnish.Google Scholar
  26. Statistics Finland (2010). Number of students in education leading to a qualification or degree unchanged. Helsinki: Statistics Finland, 26 January.Google Scholar
  27. Ylijoki, O.-H. (1998). Awtribe-cultures and the socialisation of novices. Tampere: Vastapaino. In Finnish.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Timo Aarrevaara
    • 1
  • Ian R. Dobson
    • 1
  • Elias Pekkola
    • 2
  1. 1.University of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.University of TampereTampereFinland

Personalised recommendations