Germany: How Changing Governance and Management Affects the Views and Work of the Academic Profession

Chapter
Part of the The Changing Academy – The Changing Academic Profession in International Comparative Perspective book series (CHAC, volume 2)

Abstract

The literature available suggests that the international trend toward the “managerial university” has only attained momentum in Germany since the mid-1990s – later than in many other advanced countries. As a result, German academics surveyed in 2007 continue to note the relatively strong influence of faculty on their institutions and relatively weak signs of a managerial dominance, and consequently their affiliation with their institutions – which was very low in 1992 – has increased since. Further comparison between the 1992 and 2007 surveys shows that university professors in Germany have worked longer hours and published more in recent years. This does not hold true for junior staff at universities and academics at other institutions of higher education in Germany. Altogether, the job satisfaction of academics has increased over time – most strikingly among junior academic staff at universities who had expressed a low level of satisfaction in 1992.

Keywords

High Education High Education Institution High Education System Advanced Country Teaching Load 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Altbach, P. G. (Ed.). (1996). The international academic profession: Portraits of 14 countries . Princeton: Carnegie Foundation.Google Scholar
  2. Boyer, E. L., Altbach, P. G., & Whitelaw, M. J. (1994). The academic profession: An international higher perspective . Princeton: Carnegie Foundation.Google Scholar
  3. Bracht, O., & Teichler, U. (2006). The academic profession in Germany. In Reports of changing academic profession project workshop on quality, relevance, and governance in the changing academia: International perspectives (pp. 129–150). Hiroshima: Research Institute for Higher Education, Hiroshima University.Google Scholar
  4. Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF). (2008). Bundesbericht zur Förderung des Wissenschaftlichen Nachwuchses (BuWiN) . Berlin: Bundestag.Google Scholar
  5. Burkhardt, A. (2008). Wagnis Wissenschaft: Akademische Karrierewege und das Fördersystem in Deutschland . Leipzig: Akademische Verlagsanstalt.Google Scholar
  6. Enders, J. (Ed.). (2001). Academic staff in Europe: Changing contexts and conditions . London: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  7. Enders, J. (2004). Von der Ordinarienuniversität zum kognitiven Dienstleister: Die Veränderung der Rahmenbedingungen wissenschaftlicher Arbeit an den Hochschulen. In F. Gützkow & G. Quaißer (Eds.), Hochschule gestalten – Denkanstöße aus Hochschulpolitik und Hochschulforschung. Festschrift zum 60. Geburtstag von Gerd Köhler (pp. 53–68). Bielefeld: Universitätsverlag Webler.Google Scholar
  8. Enders, J., & de Weert, E. (Eds.). (2004). The international attractiveness of the academic workplace in Europe . Frankfurt/Main: Gewerkschaft Erziehung und Wissenschaft.Google Scholar
  9. Enders, J., & Teichler, U. (1995a). Berufsbild der Lehrenden und Forschenden an Hochschulen . Bonn: Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft, Forschung und Technologie.Google Scholar
  10. Enders, J., & Teichler, U. (1995b). Der Hochschullehrerberuf im internationalen Vergleich . Bonn: Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft, Forschung und Technologie.Google Scholar
  11. Jacob, A. K., & Teichler, U. (2009). The changing employment and work situation of the academic profession in Germany. In The changing academic profession over 1992–2007: International, comparative, and quantitative perspectives (pp. 253–269). RIHE International Seminar Reports, Nr. 13. Higashi-Hiroshima: Research institute for higher education, Hiroshima University.Google Scholar
  12. Janson, K., Schomburg, H., & Teichler, U. (2006). Eher eine ‚gefühlte’ Differenz. Karriere­per­spektiven von Wissenschaftlern in Deutschland und den USA. Forschung und lehre, 13 (10), 571–573.Google Scholar
  13. Kehm, B. M. (1999). Higher education in Germany . Bucarest/Wittenberg: CEPES and Institut für Hochschulforschung.Google Scholar
  14. Kehm, B. M., & Lanzendorf, U. (Eds.). (2006). Reforming university governance: Changing conditions for research in four European countries . Bonn: Lemmens.Google Scholar
  15. KMK (Kultusministerkonferenz) (Ed.) (2003). The education system in the Federal Republic of Germany 2003 . A description of responsibilities, structures and developments in education policy for the exchange of information in Europe. In cooperation with the German EURYDICE Unit of the Federal Government in the Federal Ministry of Education and Research. Bonn: KMKGoogle Scholar
  16. Kogan, M., & Teichler, U. (Eds.). (2007). Key challenges to the academic profession . Paris und Kassel: UNESCO Forum on Higher Education, Research and Knowledge und INCHER Kassel.Google Scholar
  17. Kreckel, R. (Ed.). (2008). Zwischen Promotion und Professur: Das wissenschaftliche Personal in Deutschland im Vergleich mit Frankreich, Großbritannien, USA, Schweden, den Niederlanden, Österreich und der Schweiz . Leipzig: Akademische Verlagsanstalt.Google Scholar
  18. Locke, W., & Teichler, U. (Eds.) (2007). The changing conditions for academic work and careers in selected countries . (Werkstattberichte, Nr. 66). Kassel: International Centre for Higher Education Research Kassel, University of Kassel.Google Scholar
  19. Teichler, U. (1990). Das Hochschulwesen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Ein Überblick. In U. Teichler (Ed.), Das Hochschulwesen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (pp. 11–42). Weinheim: Deutscher Studien Verlag.Google Scholar
  20. Teichler, U. (2005). Hochschulstrukturen im Umbruch. Eine Bilanz der Reformdynamik seit vier Jahrzehnten . Frankfurt a M/New York: Campus.Google Scholar
  21. Teichler, U. (2007). Germany and beyond: New dynamics for the academic profession. In Locke, W. & U. Teichler (Eds.). The changing conditions for academic work and careers in selected countries (pp. 15–38). (Werkstattberichte, Nr. 66). Kassel: International Centre for Higher Education Research Kassel, University of Kassel 2007.Google Scholar
  22. Teichler, U. (2008). Academic staff in Germany: Per aspera ad astra? In The changing academic profession in international comparative and quantitative perspectives (pp. 131–152). Hiroshima: Research Institute for Higher Education, Hiroshima University.Google Scholar
  23. Teichler, U., & Teichler, U. (1996). The conditions of the academic profession. An international comparative analysis of the academic profession in western Europe, Japan and the USA. In P. A. M. Maassen & F. A. Van Vught (Eds.), Inside academia: New challenges for the academic profession (pp. 15–65). Utrecht: Uitgeverij De Tijdstrom.Google Scholar
  24. Turner, G. (2001). Hochschule zwischen Vorstellung und Wirklichkeit – Zur Geschichte der Hochschulreform im letzten Drittel des 20. Jahrhunderts . Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Centre for Higher Education Research (INCHER-Kassel)University of KasselKasselGermany

Personalised recommendations