• Gerardo H. Vázquez-NinEmail author
  • María Luisa Escobar
  • Olga M. Echeverría


In most mammals the corpus luteum (CL) remains functional for a period related to the length of the estral cycle. In the absence of the luteotrophic signal, the CL undergoes spontaneous loss of cell function (functional luteolysis) and structural regression (structural luteolysis), allowing the development of a new ovulatory cycle. Apoptosis occurs during spontaneous and experimental CL regression. Ovaries ­collected from caspase-3 deficient mice retained many corpora lutea at any point of time recorded post ovulation. In the marmoset, a primate, the CL showed numerous features of autophagic cell death as vacuolated cytoplasm, vacuoles ­containing cytoplasmic debris, and autophagosomes. On the other hand, typical morphological features were absent. These observations suggest that luteolytic cell death might be a combination of apoptosis and autophagy. The vasculature is an important regulator of CL functions. The capillaries disappear earlier than the large vessels during structural luteolysis. The endocrine mechanisms of the cyclical regression of the CL are slightly different in primates and other mammals. Physiological levels progesterone produced in the corpus luteum protect cells against death. The decline in progesterone preceding structural luteolysis is a prerequisite for initiation of apoptosis induced by tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) involved in apoptotic cell death activation, affecting primarily endothelial cells. Numerous findings suggest that progesterone has a role in regulating luteal and endothelial cell function in bovine corpus luteum, especially at the early luteal stage as autocrine/paracrine regulator.


Nitric Oxide Synthases Corpus Luteum Estrous Cycle Luteal Cell Late Luteal Phase 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

List of Abbreviations


Tumor necrosis factor α


Cystein protease that cleave their target protein at specific aspartic acid


Luteinizing hormone


Terminal Deoxy-UTP nick end labeling. Procedure that detects DNA breaks typical of apoptosis.


  1. Acosta TJ, Korzekwa A, Woclawek-Potocka I et al (2009) Acute changes in circulating concentrations of progesterone and nitric oxide and partial pressure of oxygen during prostaglandin F2alpha-induced luteolysis in cattle. J Reprod Dev 55:149–155PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Araujo RR, Ginther OJ, Ferreira JC et al (2009) Role of follicular estradiol-17beta in timing of luteolysis in heifers. Biol Reprod 81:429–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banu SK, Lee J, Satterfield MC et al (2008) Molecular cloning and characterization of prostaglandin (PG) transporter in ovine endometrium: role for multiple cell signaling pathways in ­transport of PGF2alpha. Endocrinology 149:219–231PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boggan RL, Henneblod JD (2010) The reverse cholesterol transport system as a potential mediator of luteolysis in the primate corpus luteum. Reproduction 139:163–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bulling A, Berg FD, Berg U et al (2000) Identification of an ovarian voltage-activated Na+ -­channel type: hints to involvement in luteolysis.Google Scholar
  6. Carambula SF, Matikainen T, Lynch MP et al (2002) Caspase-3 is a pivotal mediator of apoptosis during regression of the ovarian corpus luteum. Endocrinology 143:1495–1501PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dickinson RE, Stewart AJ, Myers M et al (2009) Differential expression and functional ­characterization of luteinizing hormone receptor splice variants in human luteal cells: implications for luteolysis. Reprod Dev 150:2873–2881Google Scholar
  8. Fraser HM, Lunn SF, Harrison DJ et al (1999) Luteal regression in the primate: different forms of cell death during natural and gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist or prostaglandin analogue-induced luteolysis. Biol Reprod 61:1468–1479PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Friedman A, Weiss S, Levy N et al (2000) Role of tumor necrosis factor alpha and its type I receptor in luteal regression: induction of programmed cell death in bovine corpus luteum-derived endothelial cells. Biol Reprod 63:1905–1912PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goyeneche AA, Martínez IL, Deis RP et al (2003a) In vivo hormonal environment leads to ­differential susceptibility of corpus luteum to apoptosis in vitro. Biol Reprod 68:2322–2330PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goyeneche AA, Deis RP, Gibori G et al (2003b) Progesterone promotes survival of the rat corpus luteum in the absence of cognate receptors. Biol Reprod 68:151–158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hojo T, Al-Zi’Abi MO, Skarzynski DJ et al (2009) Changes in the vasculature of bovine corpus luteum during the estrous cycle and prostaglandin F2α-induced luteolysis. J Reprod Develop 55:512–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hojo T, Al-Zi’Abi MO, Komiyama J et al (2010a) Expression and localization of cFLIP, an ­anti-apoptotic factor, in the bovine corpus luteum. J Reprod Dev 56:230–235PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hojo T, Oda A, Lee SH et al (2010b) Effects of tumor factor alpha and interferon gamma on the viability and mRNA expression of TNF receptor type I in endothelial cells from the bovine corpus luteum. J Reprod Dev. doi:10.1262/jrd.10-056TGoogle Scholar
  15. Juengel JL, Garverick HA, Johnson AL et al (1993) Apoptosis during luteal regression in cattle. Endocrinology 132:249–254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Komatsu K, Manabe N, Kiso M et al (2003a) Changes in localization of immune cells and cytokines in corpora lutea during luteolysis in murine ovaries. J Exp Zool A Comp Exp Biol 296:152–159PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Komatsu K, Manabe N, Kiso M et al (2003b) Soluble Fas (FasB) regulates luteal cell apoptosis during luteolysis in murine ovaries. Mol Reprod Dev 65:345–352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Komiyama J, Nishimura R, Lee HY et al (2008) Cortisol is a suppressor of apoptosis in bovine corpus luteum. Biol Reprod 78:888–895PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Korzekwa A, Murakami S, Woclawek-Potocka I et al (2008) The influence of tumor necrosis ­factor alpha (TNF) on secretory function of bovine corpus luteum: TNF and its receptors expression during the estrous cycle. Reprod Biol 8:245–262PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kuruso S, Suzuki K, Taneguchi K et al (2009) Structural regression of the rat corpus luteum of pregnancy: relationships with functional regression, apoptotic cell death, and suckling ­stimulus. Zool Sci 26:729–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee J, McCracken JA, Banu SK et al (2010) Transport of prostaglandin F(2alpha) pulses from the uterus to the ovary at the time of luteolysis in ruminants is regulated by prostaglandin ­transporter-mediated mechanisms. Encrinology 151:3326–3335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McCracken JA, Custer EE, Lamsa JC (1999) Luteolysis: a neuroendocrine-mediated event. Physiol Rev 79:263–323PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Nio-Kobayashi J, Iwanaga T (2010) Differential cellular localization of galectin-1 in the regressing corpus luteum of mice and their possible contribution to luteal cell elimination. J Histochem Cytochem 58:741–749PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nishimura R, Lomiyama J, Tasaki Y et al (2008) Hypoxia promotes luteal cell death in bovine corpus luteum. Biol Reprod 78:529–536PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rueda BR, Hendry IR, Tilly JL et al (1999) Accumulation of caspase-3 mRNA and induction of caspase activity in the ovine corpus luteum following prostaglandin-F treatment in vivo. Biol Reprod 60:1087–1092PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sakumoto R, Vermehren M, A-M KR et al (2010) Changes in the level of progesterone receptor mRNA and protein in bovine corpus luteum during the estrous cycle. J Reprod Dev 56:219–222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shirasuna K (2010) Nitric oxide and luteal blood flow in the luteolytic cascade in the cow. J Reprod Develop 56:9–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Silvia WJ, Lewis GS, McCracken JA et al (1991) Hormonal regulation of uterine secretion of prostaglandin F2 alpha during luteolysis in ruminants. Biol Rep 45:655–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sugino N, Okuda K (2007) Species-related differences in the mechanism of apoptosis during structural luteolysis. J Reprod Dev 53:977–986PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tilly JL (1996b) The molecular basis of ovarian cell death during germ cell attrition, follicular atresia, and luteolysis. Front Biosci 1:d1–11PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Vaskivuo T (2002) Regulation of apoptosis in the female reproductive system. Oulu University Library, Oulu, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  32. Weems YS, Nett TM, Rispoli LA et al (2010a) Effects of prostaglandin E and F receptor agonists in vivo on luteal function in ewes. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat 92:67–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Weems YS, Nett TM, Rispoli LA et al (2010b) Prostaglandin E1 (PGE1), but not prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), alters luteal and endometrial luteinizing hormone (LH) occupied and unoccupied LH receptors and mRNA for LH receptors in ovine luteal tissue to prevent luteolysis. Prostaglandins Other Lipids Mediat 91:42–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yuan W, Giudice LC (1997) Programmed cell death in human ovary is a function of follicle and corpus luteum status. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:3148–3155PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerardo H. Vázquez-Nin
    • 1
    Email author
  • María Luisa Escobar
    • 1
  • Olga M. Echeverría
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Electron Microscopy, Dept. of Cell Biology, Faculty of SciencesNational University of Mexico (UNAM)Mexico CityMexico

Personalised recommendations