The Institutionalization of Rankings: Managing Status Anxiety in an Increasingly Marketized Environment

  • William Locke
Part of the The Changing Academy – The Changing Academic Profession in International Comparative Perspective book series (CHAC, volume 3)


This chapter is part of a larger effort to understand how higher education institutions (HEIs) as organizations are responding to marketization, and how this influences intra-institutional relations, organizational cultures, and management styles (Locke and Botas 2009; Locke 2010). A recent study for the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) by the author and colleagues concluded that institutional rankings were being used for a broader range of purposes than originally intended, and bestowed with more meaning than the data alone may bear (Locke 2008). The study found, in particular, that higher education institutions in England were strongly influenced by rankings in both their strategic decision-making and more routine management processes. Case study institutions reported increasing reference to the rankings by prospective students and their families and by academics seeking job opportunities. Other studies have highlighted their use by employers in the marketing of graduate jobs and the selection of candidates (Morley and Aynsley 2007). Yet, analysis of three UK national tables and two world rankings confirmed they largely reflected institutional reputation and resources rather than the quality or performance of institutions.


High Education Institution Ranking System Ranking Position League Table Prospective Student 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Bastedo, M., & Bowman, N. (2011) College rankings as an interorganizational dependency: establishing the foundation for strategic and institutional accounts, Research in Higher Education, 52(1), 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bowman, N., & Bastedo, M. (2009). Getting on the front page: Organizational reputation, status signals, and the impact of U.S. news and world report on student decisions. Research in Higher Education, 50(5), 415–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clarke, M. (2007). The impact of higher education rankings on student access, choice, and ­opportunity. Higher Education in Europe, 32(1), 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cyrenne, P., & Grant, H. (2009). University decision making and prestige: An empirical study. Economics of Education Review, 28(2), 237–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Elsbach, K. D., & Kramer, R. M. (1996). Members’ responses to organizational identity threats: Encountering and countering the business week rankings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(3), 442–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Espeland, W. N., & Sauder, M. (2007). Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. The American Journal of Sociology, 113(1), 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gioia, D. A., & Corley, K. G. (2002). Being good versus looking good: Business school rankings and the Circean transformation from substance to image. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 1(1), 107–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grewal, R., Dearden, J. A., & Lilien, G. L. (2008). The university rankings game: Modeling the competition among universities for ranking. American Statistician, 62(3), 232–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hazelkorn, E. (2007). The impact of league tables and ranking systems on higher education decision-making. Higher Education Management and Policy, 19(2), 81–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hazelkorn, E. (2008). Learning to live with league tables and ranking: The experience of institutional leaders. Higher Education Policy, 21(2), 193–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hazelkorn, E. (2009). Rankings and the battle for world-class excellence: Institutional strategies and policy choices. Higher Education Management and Policy, 21(1), 55–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. IHEP. (2009). Impact of college rankings on institutional decision-making: Four country case studies, issue brief. Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy.Google Scholar
  13. King, R. (2009). Governing universities globally: Organizations, regulation and rankings. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  14. Little, B., & Locke, W. (2008, September 11–13). Conceptions of excellence in teaching and learning and implications for future policy and practice. Paper presented at the Consortium of Higher Education Researchers (CHER) 21st Annual Conference, Excellence and Diversity in Higher Education. Meanings, Goals and Instruments, Universita degli Studi di Pavia, Italy.Google Scholar
  15. Locke, W. (2008, December 9–11). A “league table culture”? The policy and governance implications of university rankings in a hierarchical higher education system. Paper to SRHE Annual Conference, Liverpool.Google Scholar
  16. Locke, W. (2010). False economy? Multiple markets, reputational hierarchy and incremental policymaking in UK higher education. In R. Brown (Ed.), HE and the market. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Locke, W., & Botas, P. (2009, September 10–12). The academic labour market in the United Kingdom: Fully developed or quasi-market?. Paper presented at 22nd Annual Conference of the Consortium of Higher Education Researchers, Porto.Google Scholar
  18. Locke, W. et al. (2008). Counting what is measured or measuring what counts? League tables and their impact on higher education institutions in England (Report to HEFCE). Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council for England.
  19. Marginson, S. (2007). Global university rankings: Implications in general and for Australia. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 29(2), 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marginson, S. (2009). The knowledge economy and higher education: A system for regulating the value of knowledge. Higher Education Management and Policy, 21(1), 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Marginson, S., & van der Wende, M. (2006). To rank or to be ranked: The impact of global rankings in higher education. Enchede: Centre for Higher Education Policy Studies, University of Twente.
  22. Marginson, S., & van der Wende, M. (2007). Globalisation and Higher Education (Education Working Paper No. 9). Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, especially Chapter 8 ‘University rankings and typologies’: 55–62.
  23. Martins, L. L. (2005). A model of the effects of reputational rankings on organizational change. Organization Science, 16(6), 701–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Meredith, M. (2004). Why do universities compete in the ratings game? An empirical analysis of the effects of the “U.S. News and World Report” college rankings. Research in Higher Education, 45(5), 443–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mohrman, K., Ma, W., & Baker, D. (2008). The research university in transition: the emerging global model. Higher Education Policy, 21, 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Monks, J., & Ehrenberg, R. G. (1999). The impact of “U.S. News & World Report” college rankings on admissions outcomes and pricing policies at selective private institutions (Working Paper 7227) Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER). http://
  27. Morley, L., & Aynsley, S. (2007). Employers, quality and standards in higher education: shared values and vocabularies or elitism and inequalities? Higher Education Quarterly, 61(3), 229–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Salmi, J., & Saroyan, A. (2007). League tables as policy instruments: Uses and misuses. Higher Education Management and Policy, 19(2), 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sauder, M., & Espeland, W. N. (2009). The discipline of rankings: Tight coupling and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 74(1), 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sauder, M., & Lancaster, R. (2006). Do rankings matter? The effects of U.S. news and world report rankings on the admissions process of law schools. Law & Society Review, 40(1), 105–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Teichler, U. (2008). Diversification? Trends and explanations of the shape and size of higher education. Higher Education, 56, 349–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Walpole, M.-B. (1998, April 13–17). National rankings: Ramifications for academic units. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego.Google Scholar
  33. Wedlin, L. (2006). Ranking business schools: Forming fields, identities and boundaries in international management education. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Higher Education Research and InformationThe Open UniversityLondonUK

Personalised recommendations