The Wiles of Argument

Protodeliberation and heroic prudence in Homer’s Odyssey
  • G. Thomas Goodnight
Part of the Argumentation Library book series (ARGA, volume 8)

Abstract

“Rhetoric, in the most general sense, is the energy inherent in emotion and thought, transmitted through a system of signs, including language, to others to influence their decisions or actions” (Kennedy, 1991, 7). In Rhetoric 1.3 Aristotle identifies a powerful form of advancing interests, political deliberation. Such argumentation is directed toward “future action in best interests of a state” (7). Aristotle believes that this form of discourse has a distinctive temporal quality, which “for the deliberative speaker [is] the future (for whether exhorting or dissuading he advises about future events).” A rhetor connects present to future prudentially through weighing excess and deficiency of alternatives. Public policy is tested by estimating its future consequences for advantage and justice. Similarly, personal decisions of “what ought to be done or not to be done,” he tells us in the Nichomachean Ethics, may be so informed by practical reasoning (Ross, 1988/1925, vi. 10). Whether public or private, all deliberation is “reasoning involved in choice,” “a kind of seeking — into what action both is possible in the circumstance and will lead to the goal in question” (Bostock, 2000, 79).

Keywords

Sexual Politics Political Deliberation Nichomachean Ethic Rocky Coast Line Comic Epic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aristotle. (1991). Aristotle on Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse. George A. Kenned, trans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aristotle. (1961). Aristotle’s Poetics. Francis Fergusson, trans. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
  3. Aristotle. (1998/1925). The Nicomachean Ethics. David Ross, trans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bostock, David. (2000). Aristotle’s Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Beye, Charles Rowan. (1993). Ancient Epic Poetry: Homer, Apollonius, Virgil. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Hexter, Ralph. (1993). A Guide to the Odyssey: A Commentary on the English Translation of Robert Fitzgerald. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  7. Hohendahl-Zoetlelief, I. M. (1980). Manners in the Homeric Epic. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
  8. Homer. (1998) The Odyssey. Robert Fitzgerald, trans. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. (Original publish 1961).Google Scholar
  9. Murnaghan, Sheila. (1987). Disguise and Recognition in the Odyssey. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Richardson, N.J. (1992). Aristotle’s reading of Homer and its background. In R. Lamberton and J.J. Keaney (Eds.), Homer’s Ancient Readers: The Hermeneutics of Greek Epic’s Earliest Exegetes (pp. 20–30). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Scott, John A. (1925). Homer and his Influence. Boston: Marshall Jones Company.Google Scholar
  12. Stanford, W. B. (1963). Personal relationships. In Charles, H. Taylor (Ed.), Essays on the Odyssey: Selected modern criticism (pp. 11–35). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Stewart, Douglas J. (1976). The Disguised Guest: Rank, Role, and identity in the Odyssey. Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Thalman, William G. (1992). The Odyssey: An Epic of Return. New York: Twayne.Google Scholar
  15. Thomas, Carol G. and Webb, Edward Kent. (1994). From orality to rhetoric: An intellectual transformation. In Ian Worthington(Ed.), Epic and Rhetoric (pp.3–25). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Thornton, Agathe. (1970). People and Themes in Homer’s Odyssey. Dunedin: Metheuen & Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
  17. Toohey, Peter (1994). In Ian Worthington (Ed.), Epic and Rhetoric (pp. 153–175). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Tracy, Stephen V. (1990). The Story of the Odyssey. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Woodhouse, W. J. (1930). The Composition of the Odyssey. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Thomas Goodnight

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations