Advertisement

Who Marries whom in Great Britain?

  • Tak Wing Chan
  • Brendan Halpin
Part of the European Studies of Population book series (ESPO, volume 12)

Abstract

Does the UK differ in its patterns of educational intermarriage? Popularly Britain is perceived to be, on the one hand, more flexible in both economy and society than mainland countries, but also hidebound by class and having an economy in longterm relative decline. There may be only fragments of truth in these popular conceptions, but it is interesting to consider why, and whether, educational intermarriage has different characteristics in the UK.

Keywords

Marriage Market Opportunity Structure Female Labor Force Participation Marriage Pattern School Departure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Biossfeld, H.-P. and A. Timm (forthcoming). ‘Who marries Whom in Germany’. In: H.-P. Blossfeld and A. Timm: Who marries whom. Educational systems as marriage markets in modern societies. (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  2. Coleman, D. and J. Salt (1992). The British population: patterns, trends, and processes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  3. Davis, H. and H. Joshi (1998). ‘Gender and income inequality in the UK 1968-1990: the feminization of earnings or of poverty?’. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, series A, 161: 33–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ermisch, J. and M. Francesconi (1998). ‘Cohabitation in Great Britain: not for long, but here to stay’. Working Paper 98-1, Essex: Institute of Social and Economic Research.Google Scholar
  5. Gonzales, M.-J. (forthcoming). ‘Who marries whom in Spain’. In: H.-P. Blossfeld and A. Timm. Who marries whom. Educational systems as marriage markets in modern societies, (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  6. Kalmijn, M. (1991). ‘Status homogamy in the United States’. American Journal of Sociology, 97: 496–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kiernan, K. E. and È. Lelièvre (1995). ‘Great Britain’. In: H.-P. Blossfeld (ed). The new role of women. Family formation in modern societies. Boulder (Colorado): Westview Press, 126–149.Google Scholar
  8. Mare, R. D. (1991). ‘Five decades of educational assortative mating’. American Sociological Review, 56: 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ofsted (1998). 953 Secondary education (1993-97). A review of secondary schools in England. London, HMSO.(Office for Standards in Education).Google Scholar
  10. West, A. and J. Hunter (1993). ‘Parents’ yiew on mixed and single-sex secondary schools’. British Educational Research Journal, 19.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tak Wing Chan
  • Brendan Halpin

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations