Advertisement

Two Decades of Educational Intermarriage in Israel

  • Haya Stier
  • Yossi Shavit
Part of the European Studies of Population book series (ESPO, volume 12)

Abstract

The propensity of people from various social groups to marry one another reflects cultural similarities or differences between groups and indexes the degree of integration among them. In addition patterns of mate selection can help predict changes in the social structure. For example increasing rates of ethnic intermarriage may indicate that ethnicity is losing its social significance and ethnic tensions are declining (e.g. Schmeltz et. al 1991). Increasing rates of educational homogamy may lead to greater educational inequality in the population because some children will benefit from having two educated parents while others will have none (Mare 1991). Thus, society’s patterns of assortative marriages mirror its past and its present, and shape its future.

Keywords

Educational Attainment Marriage Market Mate Selection Educational Category Marriage Squeeze 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Becker, G. (1981). A traetise on the family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Blossfeld, H.-P. and J. Huinink (1991). ‘Human capital investments or norm of role transition?’ American Journal of Sociology, 97: 143–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blossfeld, H.-P. and U. Jaenichen (1992). ‘Educational expansion and change in women’s entry into marriage and motherhood in the Federal Republic of Germany’. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54: 302–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cherlin, A. (1992). Marriage, divorce, re-marriage. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Eisenbach, Z. (1992). ‘Marriage and fertility in the process of integration: Intermarriage among origin groups in Israel’. In: Goldscheider, C. (ed). Population and social change in Israel. Boulder: Press, pp. 132–147.Google Scholar
  6. Goldcheider, C. (1996). Israel’s changing society: Population, ethnicity and development. Westview Press.Google Scholar
  7. Guttentag, M. and P. F. Secord (1983). Too many women: The sex ratio question. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Israel, Central Bureau of Statistics (1985). Statistical Abstract of Israel.Google Scholar
  9. Israel, Central Bureau of Statistics (1997). Statistical Abstract of Israel.Google Scholar
  10. Israel, 1, Central Bureau of Statistics (1998). Statistical Abstract of Israel.Google Scholar
  11. Mare, R. D. (1991). ‘Five decades of educational assortative mating’. American Sociological Review, 56: 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Oppenheimer, V. K. (1988). ‘A theory of marriage timing’. American Journal of Sociology, 94: 563–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Peres, Y. and R. Schrift (1978). ‘Intermarriage and inter-ethnic relations. A comparative study’. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 1: 428–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Peres, Y. and R. Schrift (1991). ‘The family in Israel: Continuous and change’. In: Shamgar-Hendelman, L. and R. Bar-Yosef (eds.). Families in Israel. Jerusalem: Akademon, 9–32 (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  15. Schmeltz, U., S. Dellapergola and U. Avner (1991). Ethnic differences among Israeli Jews: A new look. Jerusalem: The Institute of Contemporary Jewry.Google Scholar
  16. Shavit, Y. and H.-P. Blossfeld (1993). Persistent inequality. Changing educational attainment in thirteen countries. Boulder Colorado: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  17. Shavit, Y. and H. Stier (1997). ‘The role of ethnicity and education in a changing marriage market’. Megamot (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  18. Shavit, Y., Y. Cohen, H. Stier and S. Bolotin (1998). ‘Ethnic inequality in university education in Israel’.Google Scholar
  19. Stier, H. and Y. Shavit (1994). ‘Age at marriage, sex ratio and assortative mating’. European Sociological Review, 10(1): 79–87.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Haya Stier
  • Yossi Shavit

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations