Advertisement

Social Institutions

  • Seumas Miller
Chapter
Part of the Synthese Library book series (SYLI, volume 321)

Abstract

My aim in this paper is threefold. First, I will make some suggestions concerning the nature of social institutions. This will consist chiefly in distinguishing between social institutions and other related social phenomena, and describing some of the defining features of institutions. Second, I will present a critique of John Searle’s account of social institutions.1 Third, I will sketch an alternative teleological account of institutions.

Keywords

Police Officer Joint Action Social Institution Constitutive Rule Instrumental Rationality 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Giddens, A.: 1984, The Constitution of Society, Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  2. Harre, R.: 1979, Social Being, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  3. Lewis, D.: 1969, Convention, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Ma.Google Scholar
  4. Miller, S.: 1992a, “Joint Action”, Philosophical Papers xxi no.3.Google Scholar
  5. Miller, S.: 1992b, “On Conventions”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 70 no.4.Google Scholar
  6. Miller, S.: 1995, “Intentions, Ends and Joint Action”, Philosophical Papers xxiv no.1.Google Scholar
  7. Miller, S.: 1997a, “Social Norms”, in R. Tuomela and J. Hintikka (eds.), Social Action (vol.2), Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  8. Miller, S.: 1997b, “Individualism, Collective Responsibility and Corporate Crime”, Business and Professional Ethics Journal 16 no.4.Google Scholar
  9. Miller, S.: 2001, Social Action: A Teleological Account, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Olson, M.: 1965, Logic of Collective Action, Harvard University Press, Harvard.Google Scholar
  11. Searle, J. R.: 1995, The Construction of Social Reality, Penguin, London.Google Scholar
  12. Searle, J. R.: 1997, “Reply to Raimo Tuomela”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research lvii, 451–454.Google Scholar
  13. Tuomela, R.: 1995, The Importance of US, Stanford University Press, Stanford.Google Scholar
  14. Tuomela, R.: 1997, “Searle on Social Institutions”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research lvii.Google Scholar
  15. Tuomela, R. and W. Balzer: 1999, “Collective Acceptance and Collective Social Notions”, Synthese 117, 175–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Tuomela, R. (forthcoming): “Collective Acceptance, Social Institutions and Social Reality”, Journal of Economics and Sociology.Google Scholar
  17. Tuomela, R. (unpublished manuscript): “Searle, Collective Intentionality and Social Institutions.”Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Seumas Miller
    • 1
  1. 1.Charles Sturt UniversityAustralia

Personalised recommendations