A Process-Ontological Account of Work

  • Baris Parkan


This essay offers a process-ontological account of work, addressing two challenges in particular. First, I try to show that even though the phenomenon of work is extremely diverse, all occurrences to which the word ‘work’ correctly applies — according to the current semantic intuitions of the relevant linguistic community — share the feature of being: the creation of something of value. Second, guided by this initial conceptual delineation of the phenomenon, I argue that traditional ontology would face fundamental difficulties in giving an ontological analysis of work, which can be surmounted in a Whiteheadian framework. I take Whitehead’s analysis of an actual occasion as a model for an analysis of work that explains how toil (exertion of effort) can result in the accomplishment of a desired end. On this basis of this explanatory model the complex dynamicity that we experience in work as the creation of something of value can be accounted for in the well-defined terms of an ontological theory.


Work Activity Family Resemblance Actual Entity Actual Occasion Pure Possibility 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arendt, Hannah: 1958, The Human Condition, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Blaug, Mark: 1968, Economic Theory in Retrospect, Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.Google Scholar
  3. Bowley, Marian: 1973, Studies in the History of Economic Theory before 1870, London and Basingstoke: The MacMillan Press Ltd.Google Scholar
  4. Ciulla, Joanne B.: 2000, The Working Life, New York: Three Rivers Press.Google Scholar
  5. Emmet, Dorothy M.: 1932, Whitehead’s Philosophy of Organism, St. Martin’s Street, London: MacMillan and Co., Limited.Google Scholar
  6. Hall, Everett: 1963, ‘Of What Use are Whitehead’s Eternal Objects?’, in George L. Kline (ed.), Alfred North Whitehead: Essays on His Philosophy, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall Inc., pp. 102–116.Google Scholar
  7. Hartshorne, Charles: 1972, Whitehead’s Philosophy, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hegel, G.W.F.: 1967, Philosophy of Right, Oxford/London/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Kraus, Elizabeth M.: 1979, The Metaphysics of Experience, New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Lowith, Karl: 1967, From Hegel to Nietzsche, Indianapolis/Cambridge: Anchor Books, Doubleday and Company.Google Scholar
  11. Okrent, Mark: 1978-1979, ‘Work, Play and Technology’, The Philosophical Forum X(2-4), 321–340.Google Scholar
  12. Pence, Gregory E.: 1978-1979, ‘Towards a Theory of Work’, The Philosophical Forum X(2-4), 306–320.Google Scholar
  13. Whitehead, Alfred N.: 1967, Process and Reality, New York: The MacMillan Company.Google Scholar
  14. ‘Work’. Def.: 1990, Webster’s Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary, Springfield: Merriam-Webster Inc.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Baris Parkan

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations