Abstract
Aristotle’s conception of being is dynamic. He believes that a thing is most itself when engaged in its proper activities, governed by its nature. This paper explores this idea by focusing on Metaphysics Θ, a text that continues the investigation of substantial being initiated in Metaphysics Z. Q.1 claims that there are two potentiality-actuality distinctions, one concerned with potentiality in the strict sense, which is involved in change, the other concerned with potentiality in another sense, which he says is more useful for the present project. His present project is the investigation of substantial being, and the relevant potentiality is the potentiality for activity, the full manifestation of what a thing is. I explore Aristotle’s two potentiality-actuality distinctions AND argue that the second distinction is modeled on the first, with one crucial modification. Whereas a change is brought about by something other than the object or by the object itself considered as other (as when a doctor cures himself), an activity is brought about by the object itself considered as itself. This single modification yields an important difference: whereas a change leads to a state other than the one an object was previously in, an activity maintains or develops what an object already is.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ackrill, J. L.: 1972-1973, ‘Aristotle’s Definitions of psuchē’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 73, 119–133. Reprinted in J. L. Ackrill, Essays on Plato and Aristotle, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997, pp. 163-178.
Driscoll, J.: 1981, ‘EI ΔH in Aristotle’s Earlier and Later Theories of Substance’, in D. J. O’Meara (ed.), Studies in Aristotle, Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press, pp. 129–159.
Frede, M. and G. Patzig: 1988, Aristoteles Metaphysik Z. Text. Übersetzung und Kommentar, 2 vols. München: Verlag C. H. Beck.
Gill, M. L.: 1989, Aristotle on Substance: The Paradox of Unity, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gill, M. L.: 2001, ‘Aristotle’s Attack on Universals’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 20, 235–260.
Gill, M. L.: forthcoming, ‘The Unity of Substances in Metaphysics H.6’, in the Conference Proceedings of the 2002 conference on Aristotle on Substance and Predication in São Paulo, Brazil.
Harte, V.: 1996, ‘Aristotle’s Metaphysics H6: A Dialectic with Platonism’, Phronesis 41, 276–304.
Irwin, T.: 1988, Aristotle’s First Principles, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kosman, L. A.: 1969, ‘Aristotle’s Definition of Motion’, Phronesis 14, 40–62.
Kosman, L. A.: 1984, ‘Substance, Being, and Energeia’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 2, 121–149.
Lewis, F. A.: 1991, Substance and Predication in Aristotle, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lewis, F. A.: 1995, ‘Aristotle on the Unity of Substance’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 76, 222–265. Reprinted in F. A. Lewis and R. Bolton (eds.), Form, Matter, and Mixture in Aristotle, Oxford: Blackwell, 1996, pp. 39-81
Loux, M. J.: 1991, Primary Ousia, Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University Press.
Loux, M. J.: 1995, ‘Composition and Unity: An Examination of Metaphysics H.6’, in May Sim (ed.), The Crossroads of Norm and Nature: Essays on Aristotle’s Ethics and Metaphysics, Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.
Shields, C.: 1999, Order in Multiplicity: Homonymy in the Philosophy of Aristotle, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wedin, M.: 2000, Aristotle’s Theory of Substance: The Categories and Metaphysics Z, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Witt, C.: 1989, Substance and Essence in Aristotle, Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University Press.
Woods, M. J.: 1967, ‘Problems in Metaphysics Z, Chapter 13’, in J. M. E. Moravcsik (ed.), Aristotle: A Collection of Critical Essays, Notre Dame, Ind. Notre Dame University Press, pp. 215–238.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gill, M.L. (2003). Aristotle’s Distinction between Change and Activity. In: Seibt, J. (eds) Process Theories. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1044-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1044-3_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1751-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1044-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive