The Relationship Between Translatability and Competence

  • Raffaela Giovagnoli
Part of the Analecta Husserliana book series (ANHU, volume 82)


The concept of “translatability” may be analyzed within the framework of the discussion on the rationality of the standards that guide the processes of interpretation of the social sciences. In particular, the aspect of the comprehension of the meaning of a symbolic expression must be considered in that it presents different conditions depending on whether a “relativistic” or a “universalistic” position is assumed. Within the totality of the contributions made in the ample debate over this point that has been taking place since the Sixties, I shall highlight the position of Habermas in contrast to the “strong” contextualism of MacIntyre to underline the formal and universal structure of the concept of “compe-tence” understood in a pragmatic sense, which is connected to the use of language. The close connection between “translatability,” as the possibility of the interpretation of a symbolic expression, and “competence,” as the set of universal conditions that structure such a possibility, will be made clear.


Symbolic Expression Communicative Competence Linguistic Competence Universal Structure Validity Claim 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Davidson, D.Expressing Evaluations. Lawrence: University of Kansas, 1984.Google Scholar
  2. Habermas, J.Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1981.Google Scholar
  3. Habermas, J.Vorstudien und Ergänzungen zur Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1989.Google Scholar
  4. Habermas, J.Erläuterungen zur Diskursethik.Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1991.Google Scholar
  5. Habermas, J. “Rorty’s pragmatische Wende,”Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie44 (1996), pp. 715–741.Google Scholar
  6. Kripke, S.Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
  7. MacIntyre, A. “The Idea of Social Science,” in B. R. Wilson (ed.)Rationality. Oxford: Blackwell, 1970.Google Scholar
  8. MacIntyre, A.Whose Justice? Which Rationality? Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1988.Google Scholar
  9. Wilson, B. R. (ed.)Rationality. Oxford: Blackwell, 1970.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raffaela Giovagnoli

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations