Advertisement

The Birth of Man

  • Johanna Oksala
Part of the Contributions to Phenomenology book series (CTPH, volume 49)

Abstract

The miracle that saves the world, the realm of human affairs, from its normal, ‘natural’ ruin is ultimately the fact of natality, in which the faculty of action is ontologically rooted. It is, in other words, the birth of new men and the new beginning, the action they are capable of by virtue of being born. Only the full experience of this capacity can bestow upon human affairs faith and hope [...] It is this faith in and hope for the world that found perhaps its most glorious and most succinct expression in the few words with which the Gospels announced the ‘glad tidings’: ‘A child has been born unto us’ (Arendt 1998, 247).

Keywords

Sense Constitution Constitutive Condition Transcendental Phenomenology Phenomenological Investigation Transcendental Subjectivity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, J.: “Through The Wild Region: An Essay in Phenomenological Feminism.” Review of Existential Psychology & Psychiatry 18/1, 2 & 3, 1982, 241–256.Google Scholar
  2. Alter. Revue de Phénoménologie l: Naître et mourir, 1993.Google Scholar
  3. Arendt, H.: The Human Condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  4. Butler, J.: “Sexual Ideology and Phenomenological Description: A Feminist Critique of Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Perception.” In J. Allen & I. M. Young (eds.): The Thinking Muse: Feminism and Modem French Philosophy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1989, 85–100.Google Scholar
  5. Bruzina, R.: “Translator’s Introduction.” In E. Fink: Sixth Cartesian Meditation, The Idea of a Transcendental Theory of Method. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1995, vii–lxviii.Google Scholar
  6. Canguilhem, G.: “The death of man, or exhaustion of the cogito?” In G. Gutting (ed.): The Cambridge Companion to Foucault. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994, 71–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Casey, E. S.: The Fate of Place, A Philosophical History. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  8. Carr, D.: The Paradox of Subjectivity: The Self in the Transcendental Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  9. Dastur, F.: “Phenomenology of the Event: Waiting and Surprise.” Hypatia 15/4, 2000, 178–189.Google Scholar
  10. Derrida, J.: L’écriture et la differance. Paris: Seuil, 1967.Google Scholar
  11. Dreyfus, H. & Rabinow, P.: Michel Foucault, Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1982.Google Scholar
  12. Elliston, F. A.: “Introduction to Universal Teleology.” In E. Husserl: Husserl: Shorter Works, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1981, 332–333.Google Scholar
  13. Fink, E.: Sixth Cartesian Meditation. The Idea of a Transcendental Theory of Method, trans. by R. Bruzina. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  14. Fisher L.: “Phenomenology and Feminism: Perspectives on their Relation.” In L. Fisher & L. Embree (eds.): Feminist Phenomenology. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2000, 17–38.Google Scholar
  15. Fisher, L. & Embree, L. (eds.): Feminist Phenomenology. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2000.Google Scholar
  16. Foucault, M.: The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences, trans, by A. Sheridan. London: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
  17. Foucault, M.: The Archeology of Knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books, 1972.Google Scholar
  18. Foucault, M.: “Subjectivity and Truth.” In S. Lotringer & L. Hochroth (eds.): The Politics of Truth: Michel Foucault. New York: Semiotext(e), 1997, 171–198.Google Scholar
  19. Gutting, G.: Michel Foucault’s Archaeology of Scientific Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Han, B.: L’ontologie manquée de Michel Foucault. Grenoble: Millon, 1998.Google Scholar
  21. Heinämaa, S.: “Simone de Beauvoir’s Phenomenology of Sexual Difference.” Hypatia 14/4, 1999, 114–132.Google Scholar
  22. Husserl, E.: “Philosophy as Rigorous science.” In E. Husserl: Phenomenology and the Crisis of Philosophy. New York: Harper, 1911/1965, 79–122.Google Scholar
  23. Husserl, E.: Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1988.Google Scholar
  24. Husserl, E.: “Universal Teleology,” trans. by M. Biemel. In E. Hussserl: Husserl, Shorter Works. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1981, 335–337.Google Scholar
  25. Husserl, E.: The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology, trans. by D. Carr. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  26. Merleau-Ponty, M.: Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard, 1945/1954.Google Scholar
  27. Mohanty, J.N.: The Possibility of Transcendental Philosophy. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mohanty, J.N.: Transcendental Phenomenology: An Analytic Account. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989.Google Scholar
  29. Mohanty, J.N.: Phenomenology: Between Essentialism and Transcendental Philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  30. Schües, C.: “The Birth of Difference.” Human Studies 20, 1997, 243–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schües, C.: “Empirical and Transcendental Subjectivity: An Enigmatic 1. Relation?” In B. Gupta (ed.): The Empirical and the Transcendental: A Fusion of Horizons. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000, 103–117.Google Scholar
  32. Steinbock, A. J.: Home and Beyond: Generative Phenomenology after Husserl. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  33. Visker, R.: Truth and Singularity: Taking Foucault into Phenomenology. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Weiss, G.: Body Images: Embodiment as Intercorporeality. New York: Routledge, 1999.Google Scholar
  35. Young, I. M.: Throwing Like a Girl and Other Essays in Feminist Philosophy and Social Theory. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  36. Zahavi, D.: “The Self-Pluralisation of the Primal Life: A problem in Fink’s Husserl-Interprétation.” Recherches husserliennes 2, 1994, 3–18.Google Scholar
  37. Zahavi, D.: Husserl und die transzendentale Inter Subjektivität: Eine Antwort auf die sprachpragmatische Kritik. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1996.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johanna Oksala
    • 1
  1. 1.Academy of FinlandUniversity of HelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations