Abstract
This is a book on Locke’s metaphysics. In particular, this book is concerned with the relationship between Locke’s rejection of essentialism—the thesis that some objects have essential properties independently of how they are characterized—and his theory of identity and persistence, especially as it relates to organisms and persons. While I will develop Locke’s positions on these topics in detail in the ensuing chapters, my goal in the present chapter is to explain, in general terms, why these issues are worth thinking about, how we should begin, and where his views fall within the range of theoretical alternatives. I will subsequently be in a position to develop what I take to be the central problem of the book, namely, that of determining whether Locke’s rejection of essentialism is consistent with his treatment of identity and persistence.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Early proponents of this view include Thomas Reid and Bishop Butler. More recently, this view has been defended by Elias Savellos (1990), Michael Jubian (1996), and Ken Akiba (2000).
See Jubian (1996, 344).
See Trenton Merricks (1999, 984).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Conn, C.H. (2003). Introduction. In: Locke on Essence and Identity. Philosophical Studies Series, vol 98. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1005-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1005-4_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3765-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1005-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive