Advertisement

Development of High Reynolds Number Optimal Les Models

  • R. D. Moser
  • P. Zandonade
Conference paper
Part of the Fluid Mechanics and its Applications book series (FMIA, volume 74)

Abstract

The well-known goal of large-eddy simulation (LES) is to simulate high- Reynolds number turbulent flows, without resolving the dissipative scales. This requires a model for the unresolved scales, and the primary challenge of LES is the development of such models. A wide variety of LES models have been used in a range of flows, with varying success (Meneveau and Katz, 2000; Lesieur and Metáis, 1996). Recently, a new approach to the development of such models was proposed, called optimal LES. It is based on formal approximations to a well defined ideal LES evolution (Langford and Moser, 1999). The ideal LES has provably good properties, such as correct single-time statistics and minimum variance from the evolution of filtered turbulence, but unfortunately, the ideal LES model is impractical to determine.

Keywords

Direct Numerical Simulation High Reynolds Number Stochastic Estimation Isotropic Turbulence Dissipative Scale 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adrian, R. (1990). Stochastic estimation of sub-grid scale motions. Appl. Mech. Rev., 43(5):214–218.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adrian, R., Jones, B., Chung, M., Hassan, Y, Nithianandan, C, and Tung, A. (1989). Approximation of turbulent conditional averages by stochastic estimation. Phys. of Fluids, l(6):992–998.ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. Germano, M., Piomelli, U., Moin, P., and Cabot, W. (1991). A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model. Phys. of Fluids, 3:1760–1765.ADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Langford, J. A. and Moser, R. D. (1999). Optimal LES formulations for isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech., 398:321–346.MathSciNetADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Langford, J. A. and Moser, R. D. (2001). Breakdown of continuity in large-eddy simulation. Phys. of Fluids, 11:943–945.Google Scholar
  6. Lesieur, M. and Metáis, O. (1996). New trends in large-eddy simulations of turbulence. Anna. Rev. of Fluid Mech., 28:45–82.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Meneveau, C. and Katz, J. (2000). Scale-invariance and turbulence models for large-eddy simulation. Annu. Rev. of Fluid Mech., 32:1–32.MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Moser, R., Kim, J., and Mansour, N. (1999). Direct numerical simulation of turbulent channel flow up to Re τ= 590. Phys. Fluids, 11(4):943–945.ADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. D. Moser
    • 1
  • P. Zandonade
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign ChampaignChampaignUSA

Personalised recommendations