Survey of Naval Computational Needs in Fluid-Structure Interaction (Invited)

  • Paul Palo
Conference paper
Part of the Fluid Mechanics and its Applications book series (FMIA, volume 75)

Abstract

This plenary paper presents a broad survey of the computational needs of the U. S. Navy regarding fluid structure interaction. Problems with the classic periodic/quasi-periodic response are emphasized, complemented by some transient response problems as well. A collection of Navy problems are presented to represent (1) operations on the land, the sea surface, below the sea surface, and in the air, (2) spanning the many existing and emerging hardware classes and types in the U. S. Navy inventory, for (3) a wide range of operational scenarios that experience fluid-structure interaction. The goals are to credibly illustrate the incredible diversity of Navy issues in this area, and to provide sufficient descriptions to allow for a meaningful appreciation of the computational needs.

Keywords

High Cycle Fatigue Mooring Line High Cycle Fatigue Unmanned Underwater Vehicle Descent Trajectory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Landsberg, M., Keel, A.J., Darel, A., & Ruben, K.M. Parallel, coupled hydrocode simulations of weapon/target interactions for naval applications, 2nd International Conference on Fluid-Structure Interaction, June 2003, Cadiz Spain.Google Scholar
  2. Palo, P. A., Teragouchi, L. C., and Smith, M. T., Validation of the SEADYN90 Cable Simulation Model Using a Three-Dimensional Cable Deployment Data Set, ASCE Civil Engineering in the Oceans 5, College Station TX, November 1992.Google Scholar
  3. Sarpkaya, T, A Critical Review of the Intrinsic Nature of VIV, IUTAM Symposium on Integrated Modeling of Fully-Coupled Fluid-Structure Interactions using Analysis, Computations, and Experiments, New Brunswick NJ June 2003.Google Scholar
  4. Triantafyllou,, M., Mooring Line Damping and Current Forces, Joint Industry Study via Noble Denton and Assoc, Houston TX, 1992.Google Scholar
  5. Wardlaw, A., Jr. and Luton J. A., “FLUID-STRUCTURE INTERACTION MECHANISMS FOR CLOSE-IN EXPLOSIONS”, Shock and Vibration Journal, 7, (2000), pp.265–275. 2nd National Turbine Engine High Cycle Fatigue (HCF). Coord, meeting, sponsor WPAFB, Naval Post Graduate School, Monterrey, CA, December 1996.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Palo
    • 1
  1. 1.Naval Facilities Engineering Service CenterPort HuenemeUSA

Personalised recommendations