Advertisement

The Development of An Ecological Quality Assessment and Classification System for Greek Running Waters Based on Benthic Macroinvertebrates

Chapter
  • 240 Downloads
Part of the Developments in Hydrobiology book series (DIHY, volume 175)

Abstract

A first approach towards an integrated, macroinvertebrate based, river type specific system for the assessment and classification of the ecological quality in Greek rivers affected by nutrient enrichment is presented. This system, which was developed within the framework of the AQEM project application in Greece, is regionally adapted and integrated, since it contains a multitude of biotic and abiotic factors affecting taxa presences and abundances. The methodology applied is very promising for the application of the Water Framework Directive (WFD) in Greece. According to the AQEM project, a seasonal ‘multi habitat sampling’ procedure, at 45 sampling sites, scattered over three river types, was applied. In addition, a large set of hydrological, morphological, geological, biological, hydrochemical parameters and anthropogenic factors were considered. The system is based on a new, river type specific biotic metric, adapted for Greek conditions (BMG) and a new nutrient pollution metric. The developed metrics showed high correlations with each other. Hence, BMG seems to be suitable for the ecological quality assessment of Greek running waters affected by nutrients. Moreover, by applying BMG, a final classification of the rivers into five quality classes, according to the demands of the WFD, was achieved.

Key words

ecological quality assessment classification typology biotic metric nutrient metric 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anagnostopoulou, M., 1992. The relationship between the macroinvertebrate community and water quality and the applicability of biotic indices in Almopeos river system (Greece). MSc Thesis, University of Manchester, Department of Environmental Biology, Manchester, UK.Google Scholar
  2. Armitage, P. D., D. Moss, J. F. Wright & M. T. Furse, 1983. The performance of a new biological water quality score system based on macroinvertebrates over a wide range of unpolluted running-water sites. Water Res. 17(3): 333–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Artemiadou, V., 1996. Monthly fluctuation of water quality in river Aliakmonas (Macedonia, Hellas) at two sampling stations. Diploma Thesis, University of Aristotle, Department of Biology, Thessaloniki (in Greek).Google Scholar
  4. AQEM Consortium, 2002. Manual for the application of the AQEM system. A comprehensive method to assess European streams using benthic macroinvertebrates, developed for the purpose of the Water Framework Directive, Version 1.0, February 2002.Google Scholar
  5. Brabec, K., S. Zahrádková, D. Němejcová, P. Pařil, J. Kokeš & J. Jarkovský, 2004. Assessment of organic pollution effect considering differences between lotic and lentic stream habitats. Hydrobiologia 516: 331–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buffagni, A., J. Kemp, S. Erba, C. Belfiore, D. Hering & O. Moog, 2001. A Europe-wide system for assessing the quality of rivers using macroinvertebrates: the AQEM project and its importance for southern Europe (with special emphasis on Italy). In Ravera, O. (ed.), Scientific and Legal Aspects of Biological Monitoring in Freshwater. J. Limnol. 60 (Suppl. 1): 39–48.Google Scholar
  7. Buffagni, A., S. Erba, M. Cazzola & J. L. Kemp, 2004. The AQEM multimetric system for the southern Italian Apennines: assessing the impact of water quality and habitat degradation on pool macroinvertebrates in Mediterranean rivers. Hydrobiologia 516: 313–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cairns, J. & J. R. Pratt, 1993. A history of biological monitoring using benthic macroinvertebrates. In Rosenberg, D. M. & V. H. Resh (eds), Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates. Chapman & Hall, New York: 10–27.Google Scholar
  9. Cardoso, A. C, J. Duchemin, P. Magoarou & G. Premazzi, 2001. Criteria for the identification of freshwater subject to eutrophication. Their use for the implementation of the ‘Nitrates’ and Urban Waste Water Directives. EUR 19810 EN, EU-JRC.Google Scholar
  10. Giannakou, O., A. Kamarianos, Th. Koussouris & St. Kilikidis, 1997. Ecological classification of a valley river in North Greece. Proceedings of the 5th Pan-Hellenic Symposium of Oceanography and Fishery, Vol. B: 289–292 (in Greek with English abstract).Google Scholar
  11. Giannakou, O., 2000. Contribution on the assessment of organic pollution impact on the quality of running waters based on benthic macroinvertebrates. PhD Thesis, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Department of Veterinary Science (in Greek).Google Scholar
  12. Gritzalis, K., K. Bogdanos, N. Skoulikidis, I. Bertahas & Th. Koussouris, 1998. Ecological estimation of the upper part of Aliakmon river, Greece. Fresenius Environ. Bull. 7: 351–355.Google Scholar
  13. Gritzalis, K., A. Vourdouba, N. Skoulikidis, I. Bertahas & Th. Kousouris, 2000. Implementation of Water Framework Directive. Ecological Quality Assessment of Alfeios River. Proceedings of the 6th Pan-Hellenic Symposium of Oceanography and Fishery, Vol. B: 218–223 (in Greek with English abstract).Google Scholar
  14. Hemsley-Flint, B., 2000. Classification of the biological quality of rivers in England and Wales. In Wright, J. F., D. W. Sutcliffe & M. Furse (eds), Assessing the biological quality of fresh waters. RIVPACS and other techniques. Freshwat. Biol. Assoc. 55–69.Google Scholar
  15. Hering, D., A. Buffagni, O. Moog, L. Sandin, M. Sommerhäuser, I. Stubauer, C. Feld, R. Johnson, P. Pinto, N. Skoulikidis, P. Verdonschot & S. Zarádková, 2003. The development of a system to assess the ecological quality of streams based on macroinver-tebrates- design of the sampling programme within the AQEM project. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol. (in press).Google Scholar
  16. Hering, D., O. Moog, L. Sandin & P. F. M. Verdonschot, 2004. Overview and application of the AQEM assessment system. Hydrobiologia 516: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ilies, J., 1967. Limnofauna Europea. Eine Zusammenfassung aller die europäischen Binnengewässer bewohnenden mehrzelligen Tierarten mit Angaben über ihre Verbreitung und Ökologie. Gustav Fisher Verlag, Stuttgard.Google Scholar
  18. Kampa, E., 1998. Ecological Quality of the water of the river Axios during spring and summer 1997. Diploma Thesis, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Department of Biology, Thessaloniki (in Greek).Google Scholar
  19. Karaouzas, G., 2002. The freshwater quality of the Pamisos river (SW Greece) using different European sampling methods. Diploma Thesis, Brunei University, Centre for Environmental Research.Google Scholar
  20. Koussouris, Th., I. Bertahas, A. Diapoulis & K. Gritzalis, 1990. Evaluating water quality in the Louros river (Greece), using biotic indices based on invertebrate communities. Environ. Educ. Inform. 9(4): 163–174.Google Scholar
  21. Koussouris, Th., K. Gritzalis & O. Giannakou, 1997. Ecological classification of rivers of Eurytania (Greece). Proceedings of the 5th Pan-Hellenic Symposium of Oceanography and Fishery, Vol. B: 285–288.Google Scholar
  22. Knoben, R. A. E., C. Roos & M. C. M. van Oirschot, 1995. Task Force on Monitoring and Assessment. Biological Assessment Methods for Watercourses, UN/ECE, Vol. 3.Google Scholar
  23. Lazaridou-Dimitriadou, M., V Artemiadou, G. Yfantis, S. Moure- latos & Y. Mylopoulos, 1999. Contribution to the ecological quality of Aliakmon river (Macedonia, Hellas): a multivariate approach. Proceedings of the International Congress: Man and River Systems. The functioning of River Systems at the Basin scale. Hydrobiologia 100: 1–12.Google Scholar
  24. Lorenz, A., D. Hering, C. K. Feld & P. Rolauffs, 2004. A new method for assessing the impact of hydromorphological degradation on the macroinvertebrate fauna of five German stream types. Hydrobiologia 516: 107–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mavromatis, G. N. (1980). The bioclima of Greece. Relationships between climate and vegetation-bioclimatic maps. Institute for Forestry Research, Athens.Google Scholar
  26. McAleece, N., 1997. Biodiversity Beta 1. The Natural History Museum & the Scottish Association for Marine Science.Google Scholar
  27. Reice, S. R. & M. Wohlenberg, 1993. Monitoring freshwater benthic macroinvertebrates and benthic processes. Measures for assessment of ecosystem health. In Rosenberg, D. M. & V. H. Resh (eds), Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates. Chapman & Hall, New York: 287–305.Google Scholar
  28. Rodrigues Capitulo A., M. Tangorra & C. Ocon, 2001. Use of benthic macroinvertebrates to assess the ecological status of pampean rivers (Argentine). Aquat. Ecol. 35: 109–119.Google Scholar
  29. Sandin, L., M. Sommerhauser, I. Stubauer, D. Hering & R. Johnson, 2000. Stream assessment methods, stream typology approaches and outlines of a European stream typology, AQEM project (Contract No: EVK1-CT 1999-00027), 1st deliverable (31/8/00).Google Scholar
  30. Sandin, L., D. Hering, A. Buffagni, A. Lorenz, O. Moog, P. Rollaufs & I. Stubauer, 2001. Experience with different stream assessment methods and outlines of an integrated method for assessing streams using benthic macroinvertebrates, AQEM project (Contract No: EVK1-CT 1999-00027), 3rd deliverable (31/8/01).Google Scholar
  31. Skoulikidis N. Th., 1990. Biogeochemie der gröBten Flüsse Griechenlands. PhD Thesis, University of Hamburg.Google Scholar
  32. Skoulikidis N. Th., 1993. Significance evaluation of factors controlling river water composition. Environ. Geol. 22: 178–185.Google Scholar
  33. Skoulikidis N. Th., 2000. Characteristics and types of major Greek river catchments. Proc, of the 6th Pan-Hellenic Symposium of Oceanography and Fisheries, Chios, 23–26/5, 206–211 (in Greek with English abstract).Google Scholar
  34. Skoulikidis N. Th., K. Gritzalis & Th. Kouvarda, 2003. Hydrochemical and ecological quality assessment of a Mediterranean river system. GlobalNest (in press).Google Scholar
  35. Verdonschot, P. F. M. & R. C. Nijboer, 2000. Typology of macrofaunal assemblages applied to water and nature management: a Dutch approach. In Wright J. E, D. W. Sutcliffe & M. Furse (eds), Assessing the biological quality of fresh waters. RIVPACS and other techniques. Freshwat. Biol. Assoc. 241–262.Google Scholar
  36. Verdonschot, P. F. M. & R. C. Nijboer, 2004. Testing the European stream typology of the Water Framework Directive for macroinvertebrates. Hydrobiologia 516: 35–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vlek, H. E., P. F. M. Verdonschot & R. C. Nijboer, 2004. Towards a multimetric index for the assessment of Dutch streams using benthic macroinvertebrates. Hydrobiologia 516: 173–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vourdoumpa A., 1999. Water quality of a Greek river system (Alpheios, Peloponnisos) and the application of Biotic Indices. Master Thesis, University of Wales Swansea.Google Scholar
  39. Water Framework Directive, 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Centre for Marine ResearchInstitute of Inland WatersHellinikon
  2. 2.IRSA-CNRWater Research InstituteBrugherio (Mi)Italy

Personalised recommendations