Abstract
The present study aims to investigate whether taxa with a small distribution range or taxa with low abundances indicate specific habitats or a high ecological quality and what the effect is if these taxa are excluded from ecological assessment. We compared autecological features between stream dwelling taxa with a mean abundance >5 individuals per sample and a mean abundance ≤5 individuals per sample as well as between taxa with a small distribution range and taxa with a large distribution range. The number of rare taxa (either with a small distribution range or with low abundances) in a sample was related to the ecological quality classes. To test the effect of exclusion of rare taxa we constructed 8 data sets all including 142 samples of Dutch lowland streams. From each data set we stepwise excluded taxa that had low abundances or taxa that were known to be restricted in their distribution range. With help of the AQEM assessment software we calculated the final ecological quality classes and the metrics that were included in the multimetric for the original data and the 8 selected data sets.
Autecological features of the taxa within the different selections showed that taxa with small distribution ranges were often running water taxa, living on stones and gravel and indicating oligosaprobic water conditions in contrast to taxa that had a large distribution range. There were only small differences between taxa with low and high abundances. However, current velocity preference was lower for taxa with abundance ≤5 individuals per sample, saprobic values were higher and scores for typical stream habitats, such as lithal, psammal and akal were lower compared to high abundant taxa. If taxa with low abundances were excluded a higher ecological quality class was achieved in most cases, while excluding taxa with a small distribution range resulted in lower ecological quality classes. In conclusion, excluding taxa with a small distribution range led to worse ecological quality classes because these taxa have special autecological features that often indicate natural streams. On the other hand, excluding taxa with low abundances resulted in higher ecological quality classes because these taxa indicate more disturbed situations and because the number of taxa per sample was strongly reduced. Although the documentation of rare taxa (either with low abundances or with small distribution ranges) is often time and cost-intensive regarding field work, laboratory work, data processing, and analyses, the indicative power of these taxa for natural circumstances is essential and therefore rare taxa should be included in ecological assessment studies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barbour, M. T. & J. Gerritsen, 1996. Subsampling of benthic samples: a defense of the fixed-count method. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 15:386–391.
Brown, J. H., 1984. On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. Am. Nat. 124: 255–279.
Cao, Y, D. P. Larsen & R. St.-J. Thome, 2001. Rare species in multivariate analysis for bio-assessment: some considerations. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 20: 144–153.
Cao, Y, D. D. Williams & N. E. Williams, 1998. How important are rare species in aquatic community ecology and bio-assessment? Limnol. Oceanogr. 43: 1403–1409.
European Commission, 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council - Establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Brussels, Belgium, 23 October 2000.
Gaston, K. J., 1994. Rarity. Population and Community Biology Series 13. Chapman & Hall, London.
Gaston, K. J., 1998. Rarity as double jeopardy. Nature 394: 229–230.
Gauch, H. G., 1982. Multivariate Analysis in Community Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Gotelli, N. J. & G. R. Graves, 1996. Null Models in Ecology. Smithsonian Institute Press.
Hanski, I., 1991. Reply to Nee, Gregory and May. Oikos 62: 88–89.
Hanski, I., 1997. Ecology - Be diverse, be predictable. Nature 390: 440–441.
Hanski, I. & M. Gyllenberg, 1997. Uniting two general patterns in the distribution of species. Science 275: 397–400.
Hawkins, C. P. & M. P. Vinson, 2000. Weak correspondence between landscape classifications and stream invertebrate assemblages: implications for bio-assessment. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 19:501–517.
Hering, D., O. Moog, L. Sandin & P. F. M. Verdonschot, 2004. Overview and application of the AQEM assessment system. Hydrobiologia 516: 1–20.
Karr, J. R. & E. W. Chu, 1997. Biological monitoring and assessment; Using multimetric indexes effectively. EPA 235-R97-001. Univ. Washington-Seattle.
Lawton, J. H., 1993. Range, population abundance and conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 8: 409–413.
Lawton, J. H., 1999. Are there general laws in ecology? Oikos 84: 177–192.
Lenat, D. R. & V H. Resh, 2001. Taxonomy and stream ecologythe benefits of genus and species-level identifications. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 20: 287–298.
Lyons, J., S. Navarro-Perz, P. A. Cochran, E. Santana-C & M. Guzman-Arroyo, 1995. Index of biotic integrity based on fish assemblages for the conservation of streams and rivers in westcentral Mexico. Conserv. Biol. 9: 569–584.
Marchant, R., 2002. Do rare species have any place in multivariate analysis for bio-assessment? J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 21: 311–313.
Marchant, R., A. Hirst, R. H. Norris, R. Butcher, L. Metzeling & D. Tiller, 1997. Classification and ordination of macroinvertebrate assemblages from running waters in Victoria, Australia. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 16: 664–681.
Nijboer, R. C. & P. F. M. Verdonschot, 2001. Zeldzaamheid van de macrofauna van de Nederlandse binnenwateren. Werkgroep Ecologisch Waterbeheer, themanummer 19. Alterra. Wageningen, The Netherlands, 84 pp. (in Dutch).
Nijboer, R. C, R. K. Johnson, P. F. M. Verdonschot, M. Sommerhauser & A. Buffagni, 2004. Establishing reference conditions for European streams. Hydrobiologia 516: 91–105.
Pardo, I. & P. D. Armitage, 1997. Species assemblages as descriptors of mesohabitats. Hydrobiologia 344: 111–128.
Rakocinski C. F, S. S. Brown, G. R. Gaston, R. W. Heard, W. W. Walker & J. K. Summers, 1997. Macrobenthic responses to natural and contaminant-related gradients in northern Gulf of Mexico estuaries. Ecol. Appl. 7: 1278–1298.
Schmidt-Kloiber, A. & R. C. Nijboer, 2004. The effect of taxonomic resolution on the assessment of ecological water quality classes. Hydrobiologia 516: 269–283.
Sladecek, V, 1973. System of water quality from the biological point of view. Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. 7: 1–218.
Spencer, M., 2000. Are predators rare? Oikos 89: 115–122.
Thomas, C. D., 1991. Habitat use and geographical ranges of butterflies from wet lowlands of Costa Rica. Biol. Conserv. 55: 269–281.
Verdonschot, P. F. M. & R. C. Nijboer, 2004. Testing the European stream typology of the Water Framework Directive for macroinvertebrates. Hydrobiologia 516: 35–54.
Vlek, H. E., P. F. M. Verdonschot & R. C. Nijboer, 2004. Towards a multimetric index for the assessment of Dutch streams using benthic macroinvertebrates. Hydrobiologia 516: 173–189.
Zelinka, M. & P. Marvan, 1961. Zur Präzisierung der biologis- chen Klassifikation der Reinheit flieBender Gewässer. Arch. Hydrobiol. 57: 389–407.
Zelinka, M. & P. Marvan, 1966. Bemerkungen zu neuen Meth- oden der saprobiologischen Wasserbeurteilung. Verh. int. Verein. Limnol. 16: 817–822.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nijboer, R.C., Schmidt-Kloiber, A. (2004). The Effect of Excluding Taxa with Low Abundances or Taxa with Small Distribution Ranges on Ecological Assessment. In: Hering, D., Verdonschot, P.F.M., Moog, O., Sandin, L. (eds) Integrated Assessment of Running Waters in Europe. Developments in Hydrobiology, vol 175. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0993-5_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0993-5_21
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3761-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0993-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive