Abstract
One day two travelers on the beach Found an oyster within their reach. They looked, they pouted, but they could not Decide who’d eat it on the spot, And when one stopped to pick it up The other said, “Before we sup, We must decide who gets the shell. It should be he who first saw it well.” “If that’s the way,” the first one said, “My sight is good; I’m way ahead.” But the other said, “I see well, too, I’m better on that count than you.” “Yes, but even before you saw I felt its presence: that’s the law.” Unable to make each other budge. They asked Dandin to be the judge. He gravely opened up the shell And ate the oyster. Their faces fell. He then sat back satisfied And in a heavy voice replied, “The verdict is that each shall get An equal phase,” and so he let Each have one shell and, saying grace, Bade each be at peace with his place.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fontaine, L. (2003). The Oyster and the Disputants. In: Faure, G.O. (eds) How People Negotiate. Advances in Group Decision and Negotiation, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0989-8_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0989-8_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1831-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0989-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive