Advertisement

India

  • I. C. Verma
  • Kusum Verma
Part of the International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine book series (LIME, volume 17)

Abstract

The fundamental ethical principles that govern the practice of genetic medicine are patient autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice. In India and other developing countries the application of these principles is influenced by poverty and numerous social factors. Table 1 compares the demographic indicators in India with those in Thailand, Japan, US, and UK (UNICEF, 1998). It emphasizes the huge population in India, high birth rate, and an infant mortality rate 9–18 times more than that of the US or Japan. Most striking is the per capita income, which is 79 times less than that in the US, and 116 times less than that in Japan. Adult literacy is also almost 1/2 of that observed in US/Japan. It is thus easy to see that the majority of the people are struggling for survival, and have limited resources for their basic needs like food, housing, education, and health. For them “survival is more important than ethics” (Siva Subramanian, 1986). This position is not well appreciated in the West. For example, child labor in India has been the cause of much hue and cry in the West (Flor Cruz et al., 1996). The fact remains that these children have to engage in labor in order to survive. For them “no labor” means no or little food, malnutrition, misery, and slow deatH. Therefore attempts in western countries to boycott the products of those industries which employ children are ill-founded (Table 1).
Table 1.

Demographic Indic ators in Different Countries

 

India

Thailand

Japan

US

UK

Population (millions0029;

944.5

58.7

125.4

269.4

58.1

Annual births (millions0029;

24.3

0.99

1.28

3.83

0.70

Infant mortality rate/lOOO

73

31

4

8

6

Under 5 mortality rate

111

38

6

8

7

Life expectanc y

62

69

80

76

77

Adult literacy

52

94

>95

99

>95

GNP (USS/capita)

340

2,740

39,640

26,980

18,700

Modified from “The State of the World's Children 1998.GNP (USS/capita)UNICEF.

Keywords

Genetic Counseling Down Syndrome Prenatal Diagnosis Spinal Muscular Atrophy Artificial Insemination 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Advani, M. Doctor-patient Relationship in Indian Hospitals. Jaipur: Sanghi Prakashan, 1980.Google Scholar
  2. Consultative Document on Ethical Guidelines on Biomedical Research involving Human Subjects. New Delhi: Indian Council of Medical Research, 1997.Google Scholar
  3. Francis, C.M. Ethics in medical education. Health For the Millions 1996; 4: 3-6.Google Scholar
  4. Flor-Cruz, J.A., Ganguly, M., and Thompson, D. The Young and the Damned. Times Weekly April 15, 1996: 34-37.Google Scholar
  5. ICMR Guidelines on Ethical Considerations involved in Research on Human Subjects. New Delhi: Indian Council of Medical Research, 1994.Google Scholar
  6. ICMR Guidelines on Responsibility For Clinical Trials of Contraceptives Conducted in India. New Delhi: Indian Council of Medical Research, 1994.Google Scholar
  7. Indian Council of Medical Research, Office Memorandum. Transportation of Biological Samples Out of the Country for the Purpose of Analysis, Diagnosis and Research Work. New Delhi: Indian Council of Medical Research, 1992.Google Scholar
  8. Jayaraman, K.S. India drafts law to protect bio-sources. Nature 1997; 390: 108.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kabra, S.G. Reproductive health care for women: a saga of excess, exploitation and violation. Issues in Medical Ethics 1997; 5: 47–48.Google Scholar
  10. Kusum. Artificial Insemination Act — cutting through natal legalese. The Hindustan Times 18 October 1995.Google Scholar
  11. Memorandum No. L. 19015/53/97-IH(Pt.). Guidelines for Exchange of Human Biological Material for Biomedical Research Purposes. Ministry of Health & Family Welfare. New Delhi: Department of Health, Nirman Bhawan, 1997.Google Scholar
  12. Pandya, S.K. Hospital Ethical Committees. Issues in Medical Ethics 1996; 4: 51.Google Scholar
  13. Patel, V. The ethics of gender justice. Medical Ethics 1995; 3: 65-67.Google Scholar
  14. Radcliffe-Richards, J., Daar, A.S., Guttman R.D. et al. The case for allowing kidney sales. Lancet 1998; 351: 1950-1952.Google Scholar
  15. Singh, K.S. People of India — an Introduction. Calcutta: Anthropological Survey of India, 1992.Google Scholar
  16. Singh, J. Medical profession and Consumer Protection Act. Jaipur: Bharat Law Publications, 1994.Google Scholar
  17. Singh, J.R. Bioethics of sex preference. In: Fujiki, N. and Macer, D.R.J. (eds), Bioethics in Asia. Christchurch, New Zealand: Eubios Ethics Institute, 1998, pp. 398–402.Google Scholar
  18. Siva Subramanian. In India, Nepal and Srilanka quality of life weighs heavily. Hastings Center Report. Institute of Society, Ethics and the Life Sciences. No. 10706. Aug 1986: 20-22.Google Scholar
  19. The Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques (Regulation and Prevention of Misuse) Act 1994; and Rules, 1996. New Delhi: Akalank Publications, 1996.Google Scholar
  20. The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 19971 (Act no. 34 of 1974). Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section IA, no. 30, Vol. IX, dated 6th July 1973. pp. 515-519.Google Scholar
  21. UNICEF. The State of the World's Children 1998. Oxford and Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  22. Verma, I.C. Bioethical developments in India: 1989-91. In: Lusting, B.A., Brody, B.A., Engelhardt, Jr, H.T., and McCullough, L.B. (eds), Bioethics Yearbook. Vol. 2. Regional Developments in Bioethics: 1989-91. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992, pp. 309–341.Google Scholar
  23. Verma, I.C. Ethical concerns in genome diversity studies in developing countries. In: Knoppers, B.M., Laberge, C.M., and Hirtle, M. (eds), Human DNA: Law and Policy. International and Comparative Perspectives. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1997, 257–263.Google Scholar
  24. Verma, I.C. Ethics and human genome studies and genetic services in India. In: Fujiki, N. and Macer, D.R.J. (eds), Bioethics in Asia. Christchurch, New Zealand: Eubios Ethics Institute, 1998, pp. 215–220.Google Scholar
  25. Verma, I.C. and Singh, B. Ethics and medical genetics in India. In: Wertz, D.C and Fletcher, J.C. (eds), Ethics & Human Genetics, A Cross Cultural Perspective. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1989.Google Scholar
  26. Verma, I.C., Fujiki, N., Marwaha, R.K., Ahuja, Y.R., Malhotra, K.C., Parikh, A.R, and Sharma, S. The common people's viewpoint on handicaps and heredity. In Proceedings of 2nd International Bioethics Seminar, Fukui, Japan, 1992.Google Scholar
  27. Verma, K., D'Monte, B., Adkoli, B.V., and Nayar, V. (eds). Inquiry Driven Strategies for Innovation in Medical Education in India. New Delhi: All India Institute of Medical Sciences, 1992.Google Scholar
  28. Verma, K., Nayar, U., and Adkoli, B.V (eds). Inquiry Driven Strategies for Innovation in Medical Education in India — Curricular Reforms. New Delhi: All India Institute of Medical Sciences, 199Google Scholar
  29. Verma, K., Mehta, M., Adkoli, B.V, and Paul, V.K. Issue in Health Care Ethics — Perspectives from India. KL Wig Centre for Medical Education & Technology, New Delhi: All India Institute of Medical Sciences, 1997.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. C. Verma
  • Kusum Verma

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations