Advertisement

Germany

  • Irmgard Nippert
  • Gerhard Wolff
Part of the International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine book series (LIME, volume 17)

Abstract

The Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) is located in central Europe. It covers a total area of 356,910 km2. Following unification on October 3, 1990, it includes the formerly separate Federal Republic of Germany (West Germany), the German Democratic Republic (East Germany) and Berlin. In 1997 it had a population of 82 million, and a density of 230 people/km2. The age structure is characterized by an increasing proportion of elderly people. In 1997, 16% of the population was 0–14 years old, 68% 15–64 years and 16% 65 years and over. The population growth rate in 1997 was 0.0%, the birth rate 8.98 births/1,000 population and the death rate 10.82/1,000 population.

Keywords

Genetic Counseling Down Syndrome Medical Genetic Genetic Service Sickness Fund 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Burleigh, M. Death and Deliverance: “Euthanasia” in Germany C. 1900-1945. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 199Google Scholar
  2. Cohen, P.E., Wertz, D.C., Nippert, I., and Wolff, G. Genetic counseling practices in Germany: a comparison between East German and West German geneticists. Journal of Genetic Counseling 1997; 6: 61–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fraser, F.C. Genetic counseling. American Journal of Human Genetics 1974; 26: 636–659.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Mueller-Hill, B. Bioscience in totalitarian regimes: the lesson to be learned from Nazi Germany. In: Roy, D., Wynne, B. and Old, R. (eds), Bioscience and Society. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1991, pp. 67–76.Google Scholar
  5. Nippert, I. and Horst, J. Die Anwendungsproblematik der pränatalen Diagnose aus der Sicht von Beratenen und Beratern — unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der derzeitigen und zukünftig möglichen Nutzung der Genomanalyse. Gutachten im Auftrag des Büros für Technikfolgen-AbSchätzung (TAB) beim Deutschen Bundestag, veröffentlicht als TAB-Hintergrundpapier Nr. 2, Bonn, Januar 1994.Google Scholar
  6. Nippert, I. and Pawlowitzki, LH. Who gets Amniocentesis? Utilization of prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis by Reg.-Bez. Münster residents. In: Eimeren, W v., Engelbrecht, R. and Ragle, CH.D. (eds), 3rd International Conference on System Science in Health Care. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer-Verlag, 1984, pp. 612–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Positionspapier der Gesellschaft für Humangenetik e.V. (GfH), Medizinische Genetik 1996; 8: 125–131.Google Scholar
  8. Rudel, R. Selbsthilfegruppen und Humangenetiker beschließen Gründung eines Dachverbandes. Medizinische Genetik 1995; 7(1): 48.Google Scholar
  9. Stellungnahme zur genetischen Diagnostik bei Kindern und Jugendlichen (GfH). Medizinische Genetik 1995; 7: 358–359.Google Scholar
  10. Vogel, F. Human genetics and the responsibility of the doctor. In: Jonas, H., Vogel, F., Catenhusen, W.-M. and Reiter, J. (eds), Ethics and Genetic Technology. Gesellschaft Gensundheit and Forschung, e.V, Frankfurt, 1998, pp. 25–37 [German].Google Scholar
  11. Vogel, W. On the self-understanding of genetic counseling. In: Neuer-Miebach, T. and Tarneden, R. (eds), The Right to be Different: Inquiry into Prenatal Diagnosis and Human Genetic Counseling. Marburg: Lebenshilfe-Verlag, 1994, pp. 53–60 [German].Google Scholar
  12. Wolff, G. and Jung, C. Nondirectiveness and genetic counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling 1995; 4: 3–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Irmgard Nippert
  • Gerhard Wolff

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations