The Transition from Conventional to Organic Rice Production in Northeastern Thailand: Prospect and Challenges

  • Natedao Taotawin
Part of the Advances in Global Change Research book series (AGLO, volume 45)


This chapter examines the process of market integration and its impact on farmer livelihoods and the environment and agriculture of northeastern Thailand. Using an anthropological approach and fieldwork conducted in the northeast of Thailand during 2008–2009, the chapter shows the way in which northeastern Thai farmers have integrated their practices into the ethical niche markets of fair trade and organic food. This chapter also illustrates the impacts of the buyer-driven food chains on social–nature relations in the northeast of Thailand and the changes that have occurred as a result. Competition in the organic trade market depends significantly on the capacity of farmers to comply with international regulations, so this paper will also focus on the distinctiveness of socio-economic and ecological conditions in northeastern Thailand, especially those which have contributed considerably to competition in fair trade products and organic rice commodities.

The chapter argues that conversion to organic agriculture is a strategy employed by northeastern Thai farmers in northeastern Thailand to cope with the problems of environmental deterioration and increasing production costs, yet the emergence of niche markets has brought both opportunities and challenges. The farmers participating in these niche markets can maintain their farmland and gain benefits from the value-added production they engage in, but they confront difficulties related to intensive labor-use, tighter standards and controls, and increasing production costs. In addition, the emergence of niche markets in northeastern Thailand has been an uneven process, as the majority of farmers have been excluded from the rise of niche markets and have not been able to convert to organic agriculture because of a lack of technical knowledge and finances.


Organic Agriculture Fair Trade Green Revolution Niche Market Commodity Chain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Brookfield H (2008) Family farms are still around: time to invert the old agrarian question. Geography Compass 2(1):108–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Browne AW, Harris PJC, Hofny-Collins AH, Pasiecznik N, Wallace RR et al (2000) Organic production and ethical trade: definition, practice and links. J Food Policy 25:69–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Darnhofer I (2005) Organic farming and rural development: some evidence from Austria. J Sociologia Ruralis 45(4):308–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dawe D (2002) The changing structure of the world rice market, 1950–2000. J Food Policy 27:355–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ellis F (1998) Household strategies and rural livelihood diversification. J Dev Stud 35(1):1–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gereffi G (1994) The organization of buyer-driven global commodity chains: how U.S. retailers shape overseas production networks. In: Gereffi G, Morzeniewicz M (eds) Commodity chains and global capitalism. Praeger, Westport, Connecticut, and London, pp 95–122Google Scholar
  7. Guthman J (1998) Regulating meaning, appropriating nature: the condification of California organic agriculture. Antipode 30(2):135–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hart G (1997) Multiple trajectories of rural industrialisation: an agrarian critique of industrial restructuring and the new institutionalism. In: Goodman D, Watts MJ (eds) Globalizing food: agrarian questions and global restructuring. University of California Press, California, pp 56–73Google Scholar
  9. Henson S, Loader R (2001) Barriers to agricultural exports from developing countries: the role of sanitary and phytosanitary requirements. J World Dev 29(1):85–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hughes A (2004) Accounting for ethical trade: global commodity networks, virtualism and the audit economy. In: Hughes A, Reimer S (eds) Geographies of commodity chains. Routledge, London and New York, pp 215–232Google Scholar
  11. Hseith SC, Ruttan VW (1967) Environmental, technological, and institutional factors in the growth of rice production: Philippines, Thailand and Taiwan. Food Research Institute Studies, 7(3)Google Scholar
  12. Isvilanonda S, Seiichi F (2005) Export potentials and constraints for development of jasmine rice production in Thailand. J Int Cooperation Stud 13(2):29–48Google Scholar
  13. Kautsky K (1988) The agrarian question. Winchester, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Kolseus H (1972) Modernization of paddy rice farming in Northeast Thailand with special reference to use of fertilizer. Dissertation for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Agricultural Economics. University of Kentucky, Kentucky cityGoogle Scholar
  15. Manarangsan S, Suwanjindar S (1992) Contract farming and outgrower schemes in Thailand. In: Contract farming in Southeast Asia. Three country studies. Institute for Advanced Studies, University of Malaya, Kuala LumpurGoogle Scholar
  16. Mills MB (2001) Thai women in the global labor force: consuming desires, contested selves. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Panyakul W (2004) Organic farming: how to be certified? Earth Net Foundation, BangkokGoogle Scholar
  18. Phatharathananunth S (2002) The politics of the NGO movement in Northeast Thailand. J Asian Review 15:21–36Google Scholar
  19. Pingali PL, Hossain M, Gerpacio RV et al (1997) Asian rice bowls: the returning crisis? Cabinternational and International Rice Research Insititute (IRRI), New York and ManilaGoogle Scholar
  20. Raynolds LT (1994) Institutionalizing flexibility: a comparative analysis of Fordist and post-Fordist models of third world agro-export production. In: Gereffi G, Morzeniewicz M (eds) Commodity chains and global capitalism. Praeger, Westport, Connecticut, and London, pp 143–161Google Scholar
  21. Rice BA (2001) Noble goals and challenging terrain: organic and fair trade coffee movements in the global market place. J Agric Environ Ethics 14:39–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rigg J (2001) More than the soil. Pearson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Rigg J (2006) Land, farming, livelihoods and poverty: rethinking the links in the rural south. J World Dev 34(1):180–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schoenberger E (1994) Competition, time, and space in industrial change. In: Gereffi G, Morzeniewicz M (eds) Commodity chains and global capitalism. Praeger, Westport, Connecticut and London, pp 51–66Google Scholar
  25. Siamwala A (1989) The question for the development of Thai agricultural sector in the future. J Thai Parliament 37(9):32–52Google Scholar
  26. Silcock TH (1970) The economic development of Thai agriculture. Australian National University Press, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  27. Young N (2006) Distance as a hybrid actor in rural economies. J Rural Stud 22:253–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Faculty of Social ScienceChiang Mai UniversityChiang MaiThailand

Personalised recommendations