Advertisement

Chromosome 1

  • Herman E. Wyandt
  • Vijay S. Tonk
Chapter

Abstract

Secondary constrictions in the human karyotype are less intensely stained by plain Giemsa than the rest of the chromosome. By G-banding, this region (designated the 1qh region, which typically corresponds to band q12) is more variably stained. It may appear as a Giemsa positive band or as a combination of darker and lighter bands (Fig. 6.1a). Long 1qh regions may appear as two or more dark bands separated by Giemsa-negative bands (Fig. 6.1a5). By C-banding, the entire region is usually Giemsa-positive (Figs. 6.1b and 2.2a). Variations in the size of the secondary constriction of chromosome 1 by plain Giemsa were early noted to occur in 1/100 to 1/1000 newborns (Lubs and Ruddle, Nature 233:134–136, 1971). Variations in size by C-banding range from less than 1/2 the size of 16p (level 1,) to more than twice the size of 16p (level 5). From the New Haven study (Lubs et al., Population cytogenetic studies in humans, 1977), 7.5% of children showed size variations by C-banding, 80% of which were level 5 variants, and 20% of which were level 1 variants (Fig. 6.2-1).

Keywords

Secondary Constriction Light Band Alpha Satellite Normal Physical Examination Complete Inversion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Lubs HA, Ruddle FH (1971) Chromosome polymorphism in American negro and white populations. Nature 233:134–136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lubs HA, Patil SR, Kimberling WJ, Brown J, Cohen M, Gerald P, Hecht F, Myrianthopoulos N, Summit RL (1977) Q and C-banding polymorphisms in 7 and 8 year old children: racial differences and clinical significance. In: Hook EB, Porter IH (eds) Population cytogenetic studies in humans. Academic Press, New York, pp 133–159Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Magenis RE, Palmer CG, Wang L, Brown M, Chamberlin J, Parks M, Merritt AD, Rivas M, Yu PL (1977) Heritability of chromosome banding variants. In: Hook EB, Porter IH (eds) Population cytogenetics. Studies in humans. Academic Press, New York, pp 179–188Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hsu LYF, Benn PA, Tannenbaum HL, Perlis TE, Carlson AD (1987) Chromosomal polymorphisms of 1,9, 16 and Y in 4 major ethnic groups: a large prenatal study. Am J Med Genet 26:95–101PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Magenis RE, Donlon TA, Wyandt HE (1978) Giemsa-11 staining of chromosome 1: a newly described heteromorphism. Science 202:64–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Babu A, Verma RS (1986) Cytochemical heterogeneity of the C-band in human chromosome 1. Histochem J 18:329–333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hedemann U, Schurmann M, Schwinger E (1988) The effect of restriction enzyme digestion of human metaphase chromosomes on C-band variants of chromosomes 1 and 9. Genome 30:652–655PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schnedl W (1978) Structure and variability of human chromosomes analyzed by recent techniques. Hum Genet 41:1–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gardner RJM, McCreanor HR, Paraslow MI, Veale AMO (1974) Are 1q+ chromosomes harmless? Clin Genet 6:383–393PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Verma RS, Luke S, Brennan JP, Mathews T, Conte RA, Macera MJ (1993) Molecular topography of the secondary construction region (qh) of human chromosome 9 with an unusual euchromatic band. Am J Hum Genet 52:981–986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Verma RS, Kleyman SM, Conte RA (1997) An unusual G-negative band within 1qh region: a rare variant or an abnormality? Ann Genet 40:229–231PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gardner RJM, Sutherland, GR (2004) Chromosome abnormalities and genetic counseling, 3rd edn. Oxford University, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wyandt HE, Patil RS (2004) Heteromorphisms in clinical populations. In: Wyandt HE, Tonk VS (eds) Atlas of human chromosome heteromorphisms. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 47–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sawyer JR, Swanson CM, Wheeler G, Cunniff C (1995) Chromosome instability in ICF syndrome: formation of micronuclei from multibranched chromomosomes 1 demonstrated by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Am J Med Genet 56:203–209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jeanpierre M, Turleau C, Aurias A, Prieur M, Ledeist F, Fischer A, Viegas-Pequignot E (1993) An embryonic-like methylation pattern of classical satellite DNA is observed in ICF syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 2:731–735PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ji W, Hernandez R, Zhang XY, Qu GZ, Frady A, Varela M, Ehrlich M (1997) DNA demethylation and pericentromeric rearrangements of chromosome 1. Mut Res 379:33–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Verma RS, Ramesh KH, Mathews T, Kleyman SM, Conte RA (1996) Centromeric alphoid sequences are breakage prone resulting in pericentromeric inversion heteromorphism of qh region of chromosome 1. Annal Genet 39(4):205–208Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Surralles J, Darroudi F, Natarajan AT (1997) Low level DNA repair in human chromosome 1 heterochromatin. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 20:173–184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jalal SM, Ketterling RP (2004). Euchromatic Variants. In: Wyandt HE, Tonk VS (eds) Atlas of human chromosome heteromorphisms. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 75–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bortotto L, Piovan E, Furlan R, Rivera H, Zuffardi O (1990) Chromosome imbalance, normal phenotype, and imprinting. J Med Genet 27:582–587PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zaslav AL, Blumenthal D, Fox JE, Thomson KA, Segraves R, Weinstein ME (1993) A rare inherited euchromatic heteromorphism on chromosome 1. Prenat Diagn 13:569–573PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Boston University School of Medicine Center for Human GeneticsBostonUSA
  2. 2.Acupath Laboratories, Inc.PlainviewUSA
  3. 3.Department of PediatricsTexas Tech University Health Science CenterLubbockUSA

Personalised recommendations