Advertisement

Analysis of Filament Wound Tubes Against Torsion

  • L. Parnas
  • N. Akkaş
Chapter
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (ASHT, volume 43)

Abstract

The response of filament-wound composite tubes under pure torsional loading has been investigated. The tubes, produced using the wet winding technique, are made of E-Glass, S2-Glass, Aramid and Carbon/Epoxy with three lamination sequences and three different helix-winding angles. Experiments have been performed by applying twisting moment at the free end which is also free to extend or contract in axial direction while keeping the other end fixed by special end fixtures. Specimens have the same internal diameter. Experimental results are compared with those obtained from a finite element study and the results are in satisfactory agreement. The results show that Carbon/Epoxy specimens have the highest shear modulus among all and the best results in terms of torsional stiffness are obtained for specimens with ± 45° winding angles.

Keywords

Shear Strain Torsion Test Tubular Specimen Composite Tube Filament Wound 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Davis, J.G. and Zender, G.W. (1992) Mechanical Behavior of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Epoxy Tubes, Proceedings of the 12th National SAMPE Symposium, AC-10.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Sidorin, Y.S. (1967) Experimental Investigation of the Anisotropy of Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastics During Shear, Industrial Laboratory, 32, 723–726.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Whitney, J.M., and Halpin, J.L. (1968) Analysis of Laminated Anisotropic Tubes under Combined Loading, J. Composite Materials, 2, 360–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Sherrer, R.E. 1967 Filament Wound Cylinders with Axial-symmetric Loads, J. Composite Materials, 1, 344–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Herrman, L.R. and Chan, S.T.K. (1969) Mechanical Property Tests for Cylindrically Orthotropic Materials, J. Composite Materials, 3, 136–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Rizzo, R.R. and Vicario, A.A. (1972) A Finite Element Analysis for Stress Distribution in Gripped Tubular Specimens,” Composite Materials: Testing and Design (Second Conference), ASTM STP 497, American Society for Testing and Materials, pp. 68–88.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Kus, V., (1996) Analysis of Filament Wound Cylinders Against Torsion, M.S. Thesis, the Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey, September.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Parnas, L., Altıntaş, A. and Gürbüz, R. (1995) An Investigation on Impact Strength of Fiber Reinforced Composite Pipes, Proceedings of the 7th ESIS (European Structural Integrity Society) International Conference on Mechanical Behavior of Materials, The Hague, May 28–30.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Parnas
    • 1
  • N. Akkaş
    • 2
  1. 1.Dept. of Mech. Eng.Middle East Technical UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Dept. of Eng. SciencesMiddle East Technical UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations