Abstract
While our editors were too polite to call it that, I was assigned to write the Old Professor’s chapter. It’s up to me to wrap up this volume by taking stock and looking into the future. Actually, being 30 years past the Ph.D., I rather like this role. Taking the long view suits me fine.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bishop, R. C., and T. A. Heberlein. 1979. Measuring Values of Extramarket Goods: Are Indirect Measures Biased? American Journal of Agricultural Economics 61(5):926–930.
Bishop, R. C., and T. A. Heberlein. 1986. Does Contingent Valuation Work? In An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method. Edited by Cummings, R. G., D. S. Brookshire, and W. D. Shulze. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.
Bishop, R. C., and D. W. McCollum. 1997. Assessing the Content Validity of Contingent Valuation Studies. Unpublished paper, Department of Agricultural & Applied Economics, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Brookshire, D. S., W. D. Schulze, M. A. Thayer, and R. C. d’Arge. 1982. Valuing Public Goods: A Comparison of Survey and Hedonic Approaches. American Economic Review 72:165–177.
Carson, R. T. 1997. Contingent Valuation Surveys and Tests of Insensitivity to Scope. In Determining the Value of Non-Market Goods: Economics, Psychology, and Policy Relevant Aspects of Contingent Valuation Methods. Edited by R. J. Kopp, W. Pommerhene, and N. Schwartz. Boston: Kluwer, pp. 127–163.
Carson, R. T., N. E. Flores, K. M. Martin, and J. L. Wright. 1996. Contingent Valuation and Revealed Preference Methodologies: Comparing Estimates for Quasi-Public Goods. Land Economics 72:80–99.
Diamond, P. A. 1996. Testing the Internal Consistency of Contingent Valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30:337–347.
Diamond, P. A., and J. A. Hausman. 1993. On Contingent Valuation Measurement of Nonuse Values. In Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment, Edited by Hausman, J. A., Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 3–38.
Diamond, P. A., and J. A. Hausman. 1994. Contingent Valuation: Is Any Number Better Than No Number? Journal of Economic Perspectives 8:45–64.
Fischhoff, B., and L. Furby. 1988. Measuring Values: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Transactions with Special Reference to Contingent Valuation of Visibility. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1:147–184.
Hanemann, W. M. 1994. Valuing the Environment through Contingent Valuation. Journal of Economic Perspectives 8:19–43.
Hausman, J. A., ed. 1993. Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Hausman, J. A., G. K. Leonard, and D. McFadden. 1995. A Utility-Consistent, Combined Discrete Choice and Count Data Model Assessing Recreational Use Losses Due to Natural Resource Damage. Journal of Public Economics 56:1–30.
McFadden, D. 1994. Contingent Valuation and Social Choice. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76:689–708.
Mitchell, R. C., and R. T. Carson. 1989. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Washington DC: Resources for the Future.
Paris, Q., M. R. Caputo, and G. J. Holloway. 1993. Keeping the Dream of Rigorous Hypothesis Testing Alive. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75(75th Anniversary Issue):25–40.
Poe, G. L., and R. C. Bishop. 1999. Valuing Incremental Benefits of Groundwater Protection when Exposure Levels Are Known. Environmental and Resource Economics 13:241–367.
Poor, P. J., K. J. Boyle, L. O. Taylor, and R. Bouchard. 2001. Objective versus Subjective Measures of Water Clarity in Hedonic Property Value Models. Land Economics 77:482–493.
Portney, P. R. 1994. The Contingent Valuation Debated: Why Economists Should Care. Journal of Economic Perspectives 8:3–17.
Rosen, S. 1974. Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation. Journal of Political Economy 82:34–55.
U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 1993. Natural Resource Damage Assessments Under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990. [Report of the NOAA Blue Ribbon Panel on Contingent Valuation] Federal Register 58:4601–4614.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2000. Guidelines for Preparing Economic Analyses. EPA 240-R-00-003. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Wilson, M. A. 2000. Rethinking Scope Sensitivity and Contingent Valuation Surveys: Strong Environmental Attitudes and Contingent Economic Values. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Rural Sociology, University of Wisconsin — Madison.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bishop, R.C. (2003). Where to from Here?. In: Champ, P.A., Boyle, K.J., Brown, T.C. (eds) A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation. The Economics of Non-Market Goods and Resources, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0826-6_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0826-6_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1445-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0826-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive