Advertisement

Against the Perennial

The Changing Face of Philosophy
  • Joseph C. Pitt
Chapter
Part of the Philosophy of Engineering and Technology book series (POET, volume 3)

Abstract

As philosophers are wont to do, my philosophical career has been centered on the search for a philosophically adequate, i.e., universal and perennial, account of, in my case, scientific change. It has slowly dawned on me that efforts to find a single theory of how science changes seek the wrong grail. Not only has the search for a perennial, systematic, and universal explanation of scientific change been mistaken, but any such effort with respect to any of the major concepts we employ to discuss and analyze the sciences and our technologies is not only doomed, but also rightfully fuels the idea that philosophy is irrelevant. The idea of the perennial lays out the philosophical landscape as if it were static. However, a little reflection on the history of philosophy immediately tells us this is not so. The landscape changes, as it should, because philosophy is a living phenomenon responding to the issues and challenges of the day.

Keywords

Human Knowledge Symbol System Philosophical Question Scientific Change Interpretive Scheme 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ariew, R. 1999. Descartes and the Last Scholastics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bachelard, G. 1940, 1978. The Philosophy of No. Paris: Pellicanolibri.Google Scholar
  3. Baird, D. 2004. Thing Knowledge. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  4. Descartes, R. 1637. Meditations on First Philosophy. Trans. M. Crewe. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
  5. Galison, P. 1998. Image and Logic. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Hacking, I. 1983, Representing and Intervening; Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Heidegger, M. 1977. The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. Translated with an introduction by W. Lovitt. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  8. Hume, D. 1739, 1888. A Treatise on Human Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Pitt, J. 2003. “Against the Perennial”. Techne: The Society for Philosophy and Technology Quarterly Journal, 7, 2.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyVirginia TechBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations