Abstract
Our task concerns the problems of learning to live with technology. Since the characterization of technology is itself an issue of some debate, let me begin with some preliminaries. I treat technology as humanity at work in the world. That is, technology is not a thing in itself; it is the techniques and methods, including machines, tools, social systems. etc., we use to make our way in the world. Given this perspective, let me now, for the purpose of focusing our efforts here, rephrase the objective of learning to live with technology in the following way: We are concerned with the problems created by the methods we use to manipulate and investigate the world. As such, the philosophical problems of technology are problems associated with the reasoning we use to develop and employ these methods and techniques and to assess the consequences, expected and otherwise, of their use. These problems range over a variety of issues. I will be concerned only with the nature and role of values in assessing technologies. And even then, my worries are narrow and restricted to the problem of structuring the debate over how best to assess technologies.
Appeared in Technology and Life World, 1989, edited by T. Curry and L. Embrey. Reprinted with kind permission of The Center for Advanced Study in Phenomenology.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Galileo, G. 1632, 1967. Dialogue on the Two Chief World Systems. Trans. S. Drake. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Goodman, N. 1953. Fact, Fiction and Forecast. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kuhn, T. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
National Academy of Sciences. 1977. Research with Recombinant DNA. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
Pitt, J. 1989. “Simplicity and the Aesthetics of Explanation”. In Rescher N., ed., Aesthetic Factors in Natural Science, Series in Philosophy of Science, Vol. 12, pp. 27–34. Pittsburgh, PA: Center for Philosophy of Science.
Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rudner, R. 1953. “The Scientist Qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments”. Philosophy of Science, 20, 1–6.
Acknowledgment
My thanks to Richard Burian for his helpful suggestions on earlier drafts and a special note of appreciation to Ronald Druzina, despite my unwillingness to concede.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pitt, J.C. (2011). Technology and the Objectivity of Values. In: Doing Philosophy of Technology. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0820-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0820-4_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0819-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0820-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)