Skip to main content

Changing Teachers’ Work in Australia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rethinking Educational Practice Through Reflexive Inquiry

Abstract

This chapter is focused on understanding the national agenda in schooling of the Rudd/Gillard governments in Australia and its impact on teachers’ work. The focus is specifically on the National Assessment Program—Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) and the My School website. The latter records a school’s performance on NAPLAN, literacy and numeracy tests taken by all students in all Australian schools in Years 3, 5, 7 and 9 each year, against national averages and against the performance of 60 ‘Like Schools’ across Australia. The paper draws on insights derived from 12 one-day workshops conducted with teachers and principals around Australia on the national agenda. The central argument of the chapter is that Susan Groundwater-Smith’s commitment to collaborative work between academics and teachers, as a way of nourishing teachers as intellectual workers and activist professionals, as a step towards enhancing the quality of teacher practices and hence student learning, will be more difficult to achieve in schools, given the character of the national agenda—its top–down character, audit focus and underpinning by a neo-liberal social imaginary. Teachers expressed a similar stance in their views that form the basis of the argument.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander, R. (Ed.). (2009). Children their world, their education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Au, W. (2009). Unequal by design: High-stakes testing and the standardization of inequality. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. (2008). The education debate. Bristol: Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (1971). On the classification and framing of educational knowledge. In M. F. D. Young (Ed.), Knowledge and control. London: Collier-Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The flat world and education. New York: Teachers’ College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desrosieres, A. (1998). The politics of large numbers: A history of statistical reasoning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, D. (1953). The political system. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillborn, D., & Youdell, D. (2000). Rationing education: Policy, practice, reform and equity. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groundwater-Smith, S., & Mockler, N. (2009). Teacher professional learning in an age of compliance: Mind the gap. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulson, K. (2007). Neo-liberal spatial technologies: On the practices of educational policy change. Critical Studies in Education, 48(2), 179–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, D., Mills, M., Christie, P., & Lingard, B. (2006). Teachers and schooling: Making a difference. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, D. (in press). Whither a city on a hill? Globalization, quality and equity in US schools. Discourse, 32(3)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hursh, D. (2008). High stakes testing and the decline of teaching and learning. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B. (2000). Federalism in schooling since the Karmel Report (1973), schools in Australia: From modernist hope to postmodernist performativity. The Australian Educational Researcher, 27(2), 25–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B. (2010). Policy borrowing, policy learning: Testing times in Australian schooling. Critical Studies in Education, 51(2), 129–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B., & Rawolle, S. (2004). Mediatizing education policy: The journalistic field, science policy, and cross-field effects. Journal of Education Policy, 19(3), 353–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B., & Rawolle, S. (2009). Rescaling and reconstituting education policy: The knowledge economy and the scalar politics of global fields. In M. Simmons, M. Olssen, & M. Peters (Eds.), Rereading education policy: Studying the policy agenda of the twenty-first century. Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B., & Rawolle, S. (2010). Globalization and the rescaling of education politics and policy: Implications for comparative education. In M. Larsen (Ed.), New thinking in comparative education. Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B., & Renshaw, P. (2009). Teaching as research-informed and research–informing. In A. Campbell & S. Groundwater-Smith (Eds.), Connecting inquiry and professional learning in education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B., Hayes, D., Mills, M., & Christie, P. (2003). Leading learning. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D. (2000). Learning from elsewhere in education: Some perennial problems revisited with reference to British interest in Germany. Comparative Education, 36(3), 297–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, T. (1995). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing education policy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudd, K. (2009). The global financial crisis. The Monthly, 42(February), 20–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J. (2003). The activist teaching profession. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlberg, P. (2007). Education policies for raising student learning: The Finnish approach. Journal of Education Policy, 22(2), 147–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schleicher, A. (2008). Seeing school systems through the prism of PISA. In A. Luke, K. Weir, & A. Woods (Eds.), Development of a set of principles to guide a P-12 syllabus framework. Brisbane: Queensland Studies Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schriewer, J. (1990). The method of comparison and the need for externalization: Methodological criteria and sociological concepts. In J. Schriewer (Ed.), Theories and methods in comparative education. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner-Khamsi, G. (Ed.). (2004). The global politics of educational borrowing and lending. New York: Teachers’ College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stobart, G. (2008). Testing times: The uses and abuses of assessment. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taubman, P. M. (2009). Teaching by numbers. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teese, R. (2000). Academic success and social power: Examinations and inequality. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, P., Lingard, B., & Wrigley, T. (2011). Reimagining school change: The reasons for and necessity of hope. In B. Lingard, P. Thomson, & T. Wrigley (Eds.), Changing schools: Alternative models making a world of difference. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

I would like to thank Carolynn Lingard for her critical comments on various iterations of this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bob Lingard .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lingard, B. (2011). Changing Teachers’ Work in Australia. In: Mockler, N., Sachs, J. (eds) Rethinking Educational Practice Through Reflexive Inquiry. Professional Learning and Development in Schools and Higher Education, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0805-1_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics