Modeling of Distributed Parameter Systems: Overview and Classification

  • Han-Xiong Li
  • Chenkun Qi
Part of the Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering book series (ISCA, volume 50)

Abstract

This chapter provides a systematic overview of the distributed parameter system (DPS) modeling and its classification. Three different problems in DPS modeling are discussed, which includes model reduction for known DPS, parameter estimation for DPS, and system identification for unknown DPS. All approaches are classified into different categories with their limitations and advantages briefly discussed. This overview motivates us to develop new methods for DPS modeling.

Keywords

Model Reduction Finite Difference Method Partial Differential Equation Sensor Number Distribute Parameter System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abel, M.: Nonparametric modeling and spatiotemporal dynamical systems. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos 14(6), 2027–2039 (2004)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adomaitis, R.A.: RTCVD model reduction: A collocation on empirical eigenfunctions approach. Technical Report T.R.95-64, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland (1995)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Adomaitis, R.A.: A reduced-basis discretization method for chemical vapor deposition reactor simulation. Mathematical and Computer Modeling 38(1-2), 59–175 (2003)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Adrover, A., Continillo, G., Crescitelli, S., Giona, M., Russo, L.: Construction of approximate inertial manifold by decimation of collocation equations of distributed parameter systems. Computers and Chemical Engineering 26(1), 113–123 (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Adrover, A., Continillo, G., Crescitelli, S., Giona, M., Russo, L.: Wavelet-like collocation method for finite-dimensional reduction of distributed systems. Computers and Chemical Engineering 24(12), 2687–2703 (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aggelogiannaki, E., Sarimveis, H.: Nonlinear model predictive control for distributed parameter systems using data driven artificial neural network models. Computers and Chemical Engineering 32(6), 1225–1237 (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Aling, H., Banerjee, S., Bangia, A.K., Cole, V., Ebert, J., Emani-Naeini, A., Jensen, K.F., Kevrekidis, I.G., Shvartsman, S.: Nonlinear model reduction for simulation and control of rapid thermal processing. In: Proceedings of the 1977 American Control Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico, pp. 2233–2238 (1997)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Armaou, A., Christofides, P.D.: Nonlinear feedback control of parabolic partial differential equation systems with time-dependent spatial domains. Journal of Mathematical Analysis & Applications 239(1), 124–157 (1999)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Armaou, A., Christofides, P.D.: Finite-dimensional control of nonlinear parabolic PDE systems with time-dependent spatial domains using empirical eigenfunctions. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science 11(2), 287–317 (2001a)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Armaou, A., Christofides, P.D.: Robust control of parabolic PDE systems with time-dependent spatial domains. Automatica 37(1), 61–69 (2001b)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Armaou, A., Christofides, P.D.: Computation of empirical eigenfunctions and order reduction for nonlinear parabolic PDE systems with time-dependent spatial domains. Nonlinear Analysis 47(4), 2869–2874 (2001c)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bai, E.W.: An optimal two-stage identification algorithm for Hammerstein-Wiener nonlinear systems. Automatica 34(3), 333–338 (1998)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Baker, J., Christofides, P.D.: Output feedback control of parabolic PDE systems with nonlinear spatial differential operators. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 38(11), 4372–4380 (1999)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Baker, J., Christofides, P.D.: Finite-dimensional approximation and control of non-linear parabolic PDE systems. International Journal of Control 73(5), 439–456 (2000)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Balas, M.J.: The Galerkin method and feedback control of linear distributed parameter systems. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 91(2), 527–546 (1983)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Balas, M.J.: Finite dimensional control of distributed parameter systems by Galerkin approximation of infinite dimensional controller. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Application 114, 17–36 (1986)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Banerjee, S., Cole, J.V., Jensen, K.F.: Nonlinear model reduction strategies for rapid thermal processing systems. IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing 11(2), 266–275 (1998)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Banks, H.T., Daniel Lamm, P.K.: Estimation of variable coefficients in parabolic distributed systems. IEEE Transactions of Automatic Control 30(4), 386–398 (1985)MATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Banks, H.T., Kunisch, K.: Estimation techniques for distributed parameter systems. Birkhauser, Boston (1989)MATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Banks, H.T., Beeler, R.C., Kepler, G.M., Tran, H.T.: Reduced-order model modeling and control of thin film growth in a HPCVD reactor. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 62(4), 1251–1280 (2002)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Banks, H.T., Crowley, J.M., Kunisch, K.: Cubic spline approximation techniques for parameter estimation in distributed systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 28(7), 773–786 (1983)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Banks, H.T., del Rosario, R.C.H., Smith, R.C.: Reduced-order model feedback control design: Numerical implementation in a thin shell model. IEEE transactions on Automatic Control 45(7), 1312–1324 (2000)MATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Banks, H.T., Reich, S., Rosen, I.G.: Galerkin approximation for inverse problems for nonautonomous nonlinear distributed systems. Applied Mathematics and Optimization 24(3), 233–256 (1991)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bär, M., Hegger, R., Kantz, H.: Fitting partial differential equations to space-time dynamics. Physical Review E 59(1), 337–342 (1999)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bendersky, E., Christofides, P.D.: Optimization of transport-reaction processes using nonlinear model reduction. Chemical Engineering Science 55(19), 4349–4366 (2000)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Billings, S.A., Coca, D.: Identification of coupled map lattice models of deterministic distributed parameter systems. International Journal of Systems Science 33(8), 623–634 (2002)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Boyd, J.P.: Chebyshev and Fourier spectral methods, 2nd edn. Dover Publications, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Boyd, S., Chua, L.O.: Fading memory and the problem of approximating nonlinear operators with Volterra series. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems 32(11), 1150–1161 (1985)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Brenner, S.C., Ridgway Scott, L.: The mathematical theory of finite element methods. Springer, New York (1994)MATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Butkovskiy, A.G.: Green’s functions and transfer functions handbook, 1st edn. Ellis Horwood, Chichester (1982)MATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Canuto, C., et al.: Spectral methods in fluid dynamics. Springer, New York (1988)MATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Carotenuto, L., Raiconi, G.: Identifiability and identification of a Galerkin approximation for a class of distributed parameter-systems. International Journal of Systems Science 11(9), 1035–1049 (1980)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Christofides, P.D.: Robust control of parabolic PDE systems. Chemical Engineering Science 53(16), 2949–2965 (1998)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Christofides, P.D.: Nonlinear and robust control of PDE systems: Methods and applications to transport-reaction processes. Birkhäuser, Boston (2001b)MATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Christofides, P.D., Baker, J.: Robust output feedback control of quasi-linear parabolic PDE systems. Systems & Control Letters 36(5), 307–316 (1999)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Christofides, P.D., Daoutidis, P.: Finite-dimensional control of parabolic PDE systems using approximate inertial manifolds. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 216(2), 398–420 (1997)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Chung, H.Y., Sun, Y.Y.: Parameter identification of linear distributed systems via Taylor operational matrix. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 35(3), 413–416 (1988)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Coca, D., Billings, S.A.: Direct parameter identification of distributed parameter systems. International Journal of Systems Science 31(1), 11–17 (2000)MATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Coca, D., Billings, S.A.: Identification of coupled map lattice models of complex spatio-temporal patterns. Physics Letters A 287(1-2), 65–73 (2001)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Coca, D., Billings, S.A.: Identification of finite dimensional models of infinite dimensional dynamical systems. Automatica 38(11), 1851–1865 (2002)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Cruz, P., Mendes, A., Magalhaes, F.D.: Using wavelets for solving PDEs: an adaptive collocation method. Chemical Engineering Science 56(10), 3305–3309 (2001)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Deane, A.E., Kevrekidis, I.G., Karniadakis, G.E., Orszag, S.A.: Low dimensional models for complex geometry flows: Application to grooved channels and circular cylinders. Fluids Physics A 3(10), 2337–2354 (1991)MATHGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Demetriou, M.A., Rosen, I.G.: Adaptive identification of second-order distributed parameter systems. Inverse Problems 10(2), 261–294 (1994)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Deng, H., Li, H.-X., Chen, G.: Spectral-approximation-based intelligent modeling for distributed thermal processes. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 13(5), 686–700 (2005)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ding, L., Gustafsson, T., Johansson, A.: Model parameter estimation of simplified linear models for a continuous paper pulp digester. Journal of Process Control 17(2), 115–127 (2007)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Dochain, D., Babary, J.P., Tali-Maamar, N.: Modelling and adaptive control of nonlinear distributed parameter bioreactors via orthogonal collocation. Automatica 28(5), 873–883 (1992)MATHGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Dong, D., McAvoy, T.J.: Nonlinear principal component analysis-based on principal curves and neural networks. Computers and Chemical Engineering 20(1), 65–78 (1996)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Doumanidis, C.C., Fourligkas, N.: Temperature distribution control in scanned thermal processing of thin circular parts. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 9(5), 708–717 (2001)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Doyle III, F.J., Ogunnaike, B.A., Pearson, R.K.: Nonlinear model-based control using second-order Volterra Models. Automatica 31(5), 697–714 (1995)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Dubljevic, S., Christofides, P.D., Kevrekidis, I.G.: Distributed nonlinear control of diffusion-reaction processes. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control 14(2), 133–156 (2004)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Dür, A.: On the optimality of the discrete Karhunen-Loève expansion. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization 36(6), 1937–1939 (1998)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    El-Farra, N.H., Christofides, P.D.: Coordinating feedback and switching for control of spatially distributed processes. Computers and Chemical Engineering 28(1-2), 111–128 (2004)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    El-Farra, N.H., Armaou, A., Christofides, P.D.: Analysis and control of parabolic PDE systems with input constraints. Automatica 39(4), 715–725 (2003)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Fernandez-Berdaguer, E.M., Santos, J.E., Sheen, D.: An iterative procedure for estimation of variable coefficients in a hyperbolic system. Applied Mathematics and Computation 76(2-3), 213–250 (1996)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Fletcher, C.A.J.: Computational Galerkin methods, 1st edn. Springer, New York (1984)MATHGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Foias, C., Temam, R.: Algebraic approximation of attractors: The finite dimensional case. Physica D 32(2), 163–182 (1988)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Foias, C., Jolly, M.S., Kevrikidis, I.G., Sell, G.R., Titi, E.S.: On the computation of inertial manifolds. Physics Letters A 131(7-8), 433–436 (1988)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Gay, D.H., Ray, W.H.: Identification and control of distributed parameter systems by means of the singular value decomposition. Chemical Engineering Science 50(10), 1519–1539 (1995)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Ghosh, A., Ravi Kumar, V., Kulkarni, B.D.: Parameter estimation in spatially extended systems: The Karhunen-Loève and Galerkin multiple shooting approach. Physical Review E 64(5), 56222 (2001)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Gómez, J.C., Baeyens, E.: Identification of block-oriented nonlinear systems using orthonormal bases. Journal of Process Control 14(6), 685–697 (2004)Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Gonzalez-Garcia, R., Rico-Martinez, R., Kevredidis, I.G.: Identification of distributed parameter systems: A neural net based approach. Computers and Chemical Engineering 22, S965–S968 (1998)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Graham, M.D., Kevrekidis, I.G.: Alternative approaches to the Karhunen-Loève decomposition for model reduction and data analysis. Computers and Chemical Engineering 20(5), 495–506 (1996)Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Guo, L.Z., Billings, S.A.: Identification of partial differential equation models for continuous spatio-temporal dynamical systems. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems - II: Express Briefs 53(8), 657–661 (2006)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Guo, L.Z., Billings, S.A.: Sate-space reconstruction and spatio-temporal prediction of lattice dynamical systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 52(4), 622–632 (2007)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Guo, L.Z., Billings, S.A., Wei, H.L.: Estimation of spatial derivatives and identification of continuous spatio-temporal dynamical systems. International Journal of Control 79(9), 1118–1135 (2006)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Hagenblad, A., Ljung, L.: Maximum likelihood identification of Wiener models with a linear regression initialization. In: Proceedings of the 37th IEEE Conference Decision & Control, Tampa, Fourida, USA, pp. 712–713 (1998)Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Höllig, K.: Finite element methods with B-splines. Society Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia (2003)MATHGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Holmes, P., Lumley, J.L., Berkooz, G.: Turbulence, coherent structures, dynamical systems, and symmetry. Cambridge University Press, New York (1996)MATHGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Hoo, K.A., Zheng, D.: Low-order control-relevant models for a class of distributed parameter systems. Chemical Engineering Science 56(23), 6683–6710 (2001)Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Horng, I.-R., Chou, J.-H., Tsai, C.-H.: Analysis and identification of linear distributed systems via Chebyshev series. International Journal of Systems Science 17(7), 1089–1095 (1986)MATHGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Hsieh, W.W.: Nonlinear principal component analysis by neural networks. Tellus Series A - Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography 53(5), 599–615 (2001)Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Kirby, M., Miranda, R.: The nonlinear reduction of high-dimensional dynamical systems via neural networks. Physical Review Letter 72(12), 1822–1825 (1994)Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Ko, J., Kurdila, A.J., Pilant, M.S.: A class of finite element methods based on orthonormal compactly supported wavelets. Computational Mechanics 16(4), 235–244 (1995)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Kramer, M.A.: Nonlinear principal component analysis using autoassociative neural networks. AIChE Journal 37(2), 233–243 (1991)Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Kubrusly, C.S.: Distributed parameter system identification - a survey. International Journal of Control 26(4), 509–535 (1977)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Kubrusly, C.S., Curtain, R.F.: Identification of noisy distributed parameter systems using stochastic approximation. International Journal of Control 25(3), 441–455 (1977)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Lee, T.-T., Chang, Y.-F.: Analysis and identification of linear distributed systems via double general orthogonal polynomials. International Journal of Control 44(2), 395–405 (1986)MATHGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Lefèvre, L., Dochain, D., Feyo de Azevedo, S., Magnus, A.: Optimal selection of orthogonal polynomials applied to the integration of chemical reactor equations by collocation methods. Computers and Chemical Engineering 24(12), 2571–2588 (2000)Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Li, H.-X., Deng, H., Zhong, J.: Model-based integration of control and supervision for one kind of curing process. IEEE Transactions on Electronics Packaging Manufacturing 27(3), 177–186 (2004)Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Mahadevan, N., Hoo, K.A.: Wavelet-based model reduction of distributed parameter systems. Chemical Engineering Science 55(19), 4271–4290 (2000)Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Mandelj, S., Grabec, I., Govekar, E.: Statistical approach to modeling of spatiotemporal dynamics. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos 11(11), 2731–2738 (2001)Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Mandelj, S., Grabec, I., Govekar, E.: Nonparametric statistical modeling approach of spatiotemporal dynamics based on recorded data. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos 14(6), 2011–2025 (2004)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Maner, B.R., Doyle III, F.J., Ogunnaike, B.A., Pearson, R.K.: Nonlinear model predictive control of a simulated multivariable polymerization reactor using second-order Volterra models. Automatica 32(9), 1285–1301 (1996)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Marion, M., Temam, R.: Nonlinear Galerkin methods: The finite elements case. Numerische Mathematik 57(1), 205–226 (1990)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Mitchell, A.R., Griffiths, D.F.: The finite difference method in partial differential equations. Wiley, Chichester (1980)MATHGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Mohan, B.M., Datta, K.B.: Identification via Fourier series for a class of lumped and distributed parameter systems. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems 36(11), 1454–1458 (1989)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Mohan, B.M., Datta, K.B.: Linear time-invariant distributed parameter system identification via orthogonal functions. Automatica 27(2), 409–412 (1991)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Müller, T.G., Timmer, J.: Parameter identification techniques for partial differential equations. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos 14(6), 2053–2060 (2004)Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Narendra, K., Gallman, P.: An iterative method for the identification of nonlinear systems using a Hammerstein model. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 11(3), 546–550 (1966)Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Newman, A.J.: Model reduction via the Karhunen-Loève expansion part I: An exposition. Technical Report T.R.96-32, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland (1996a)Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Newman, A.J.: Model reduction via the Karhunen-Loève expansion part II: Some elementary examples. Technical Report T.R.96-33, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland (1996b)Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Omatu, S., Matumoto, K.: Parameter identification for distributed systems and its application to air pollution estimation. International Journal of Systems Science 22(10), 1993–2000 (1991)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Paraskevopoulos, P.N., Bounas, A.C.: Distributed parameter system identification via Walsh-functions. International Journal of Systems Science 9(1), 75–83 (1978)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Park, H.M., Cho, D.H.: Low dimensional modeling of flow reactors. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 39(16), 3311–3323 (1996a)Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Park, H.M., Cho, D.H.: The use of the Karhunen-Loève decomposition for the modeling of distributed parameter systems. Chemical Engineering Science 51(1), 81–98 (1996b)Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Park, H.M., Kim, T.H., Cho, D.H.: Estimation of parameters in flow reactors using the Karhunen-Loève decomposition. Computers and Chemical Engineering 23(1), 109–123 (1998)Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Parker, R.S., Heemstra, D., Doyle III, F.J., Pearson, R.K., Ogunnaike, B.A.: The identification of nonlinear models for process control using tailored “plant-friendly” input sequences. Journal of Process Control 11(2), 237–250 (2001)Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Parlitz, U., Merkwirth, C.: Prediction of spatiotemporal time series based on reconstructed local states. Physical Review Letters 84(9), 1890–1893 (2000)Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Polis, M.P., Goodson, R.E.: Parameter identification in distributed systems: A synthesizing overview. Proceedings of the IEEE 64(1), 45–61 (1976)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Powers, D.L.: Boundary value problems, 4th edn. Academic Press, San Diego (1999)MATHGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Ranganathan, V., Jha, A.N., Rajamani, V.S.: Identification of linear distributed systems via Laguerre-polynomials. International Journal of Systems Science 15(10), 1101–1106 (1984)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Ranganathan, V., Jha, A.N., Rajamani, V.S.: Identification of non-linear distributed systems via a Laguerre-polynomial approach. International Journal of Systems Science 17(2), 241–249 (1986)MATHGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Rannacher, R., Vexler, B.: A priori error estimates for the finite element discretization of elliptic parameter identification problems with pointwise measurements. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization 44(5), 1844–1863 (2005)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Ray, W.H.: Advanced process control. McGraw-Hill, New York (1981)Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Romijn, R., Özkan, L., Weiland, S., Ludlage, J., Marquardt, W.: A grey-box modeling approach for the reduction of nonlinear systems. Journal of Process Control 18(9), 906–914 (2008)Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Rugh, W.: Nonlinear system theory: The Volterral/Wiener approach. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (1981)Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Sahan, R.A., Koc-Sahan, N., Albin, D.C., Liakopoulos, A.: Artificial neural network-based modeling and intelligent control of transitional flows. In: Proceeding of the 1997 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, Hartford, CT, pp. 359–364 (1997)Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Schetzen, M.: The Volterra and Wiener theories of nonlinear systems. Wiley, New York (1980)MATHGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Schiesser, W.E.: The numerical method of lines: Integration of partial differential equations. Academic Press, San Diego (1991)MATHGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Shvartsman, S.Y., Kevrikidis, I.G.: Nonlinear model reduction for control of distributed systems: A computer-assisted study. AIChE Journal 44(7), 1579–1594 (1998)Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Sirovich, L.: Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures parts I-III. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics 45(3), 561–590 (1987)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Smaoui, N.: Linear versus nonlinear dimensionality reduction of high-dimensional dynamical systems. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 25(6), 2107–2125 (2004)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Smaoui, N., Al-Enezi, S.: Modelling the dynamics of nonlinear partial differential equations using neural networks. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 170(1), 27–58 (2004)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Stoica, P., Söderström, T.: Instrumental-variable methods for identification of Hammerstein systems. International Journal of Control 35(3), 459–476 (1982)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Temam, R.: Infinite-dimensional dynamical systems in mechanics and physics. Springer, New York (1988)MATHGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Theodoropoulou, A., Adomaitis, R.A., Zafiriou, E.: Model reduction for optimization of rapid thermal chemical vapor deposition systems. IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing 11(1), 85–98 (1998)Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Uciński, D., Korbicz, J.: Parameter identification of two-dimensional distributed systems. International Journal of Systems Science 21(12), 2441–2456 (1990)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Uciński, D., Korbicz, J.: Parameter identification of two-dimensional distributed systems. International Journal of Systems Science 21(12), 2441–2456 (1990)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Vande Wouwer, A., Renotte, C., Queinnec, I., Bogaerts, P.H.: Transient analysis of a wastewater treatment biofilter - Distributed parameter modelling and state estimation. Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems 12(5), 423–440 (2006)MATHGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Varshney, A., Armaou, A.: Low-order ODE approximations and receding horizon control of surface roughness during thin-film growth. Chemical Engineering Science 63(5), 1246–1260 (2008)Google Scholar
  121. 121.
    Voss, H., Bünner, M.J., Abel, M.: Identification of continuous, spatiotemporal systems. Physical Review E 57(3), 2820–2823 (1998)Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    Webb, A.R.: An approach to non-linear principal components analysis using radially symmetric kernel functions. Journal Statistics and Computing 6(2), 159–168 (1996)Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    Westwick, D., Verhaegen, M.: Identifying MIMO Wiener systems using subspace model identification methods. Signal Processing 52(2), 235–258 (1996)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Wilson, D.J.H., Irwin, G.W., Lightbody, G.: RBF principal manifolds for process monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 10(6), 1424–1434 (1999)Google Scholar
  125. 125.
    Zheng, D., Hoo, K.A.: Low-order model identification for implementable control solutions of distributed parameter system. Computers and Chemical Engineering 26(7-8), 1049–1076 (2002)Google Scholar
  126. 126.
    Zheng, D., Hoo, K.A.: System identification and model-based control for distributed parameter systems. Computers and Chemical Engineering 28(8), 1361–1375 (2004)Google Scholar
  127. 127.
    Zheng, D., Hoo, K.A., Piovoso, M.J.: Low-order model identification of distributed parameter systems by a combination of singular value decomposition and the Karhunen-Loève expansion. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 41(6), 1545–1556 (2002)Google Scholar
  128. 128.
    Zhou, X.G., Liu, L.H., Dai, Y.C., Yuan, W.K., Hudson, J.L.: Modeling of a fixed-bed reactor using the KL expansion and neural networks. Chemical Engineering Science 51(10), 2179–2188 (1996)Google Scholar
  129. 129.
    Zhu, Y.C.: Identification of Hammerstein models for control using ASYM. International Journal of Control 73(18), 1692–1702 (2000)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Zill, D.G., Cullen, M.R.: Differential equations with boundary-value problems, 5th edn. Brooks/Cole Thomson Learning, Pacific Grove, CA, Australia (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Netherlands 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Han-Xiong Li
    • Chenkun Qi

      There are no affiliations available

      Personalised recommendations