Monitoring Hydrogen Release from 4140 Steel Using the LCR Ultrasonic Technique

Conference paper
Part of the RILEM Bookseries book series (RILEM, volume 6)

Abstract

Hydrogen build-up and release in steel microstructure is of considerable interest in studying the mechanical performance of the material. LCR ultrasonic waves are a potential research tool that will enable the nondestructive evaluation of this reversible hydrogen buildup since their speed is affected by stress and their travel path is through affected layer just below the surface. The present study used three blocks of 4140 steel cut from a longer sample. Frequency spectrum data also were collected. The assumed model was of hydrogen occupying the vacancies in the steel block during the high temperature high-pressure period in the autoclave, and then being purged upon removal as the block contracted, creating a residual tensile stress in the surface area of the block. As the hydrogen is purged, the tensile stress should decrease. The LCR results confirmed this trend, although it was more strongly seen for the 11.7 MPa (1691 psia) block. Photomicrographs confirmed no cracks in the surfaces, although there was considerable decarburization. Frequency analysis showed that the decarburization did affect the frequency spectrum but did not affect the LCR wave speed.

Keywords

frequency spectrum hydrogen release photomicrographs Steel ultrasound 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Honeywell Inc. in Houston provided space for the samples in their autoclave and Jonathan Dahmann performed many of the experiments.

References

  1. [1].
    Smith, R. D., Benson, D. K., Maroef, L., Olson, D. L., and Wilderman, T. R., (2001). Part 2:Optoelectric diffusible hydrogen sensor,” http://files.aws.org/wj/supplement/Smith-Part2-05-01.pdf.
  2. [2].
    Imanaka, T. and Suetsugu, J., (1995). In Fitness for Service and Decisions for Petroleum and Chemical Equipment, PVP-Vol 315, Proceedings 1995 Joint ASME/JSME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, pp. 507-515. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York.Google Scholar
  3. [3].
    Bray, D. E., (2001). In Transactions of the ASME, Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, Vol. 124, pp. 326–335.Google Scholar
  4. [4].
    Bray, Don E. and Richard B. Griffin, (2010). Proceedings of the 5th International Offshore Pipel. Forum IOPF 2010-6001. Houston, Texas, USA http://www.asme-ipti.org/iopf2010/
  5. [5].
    Warren, D., (1987). In Materials Performance, January, pp. 38–48.Google Scholar
  6. [6].
    Pinault, J. (2010). Private communication to M. Srinivasan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Don E. Bray, Inc.TexasUSA
  2. 2.Texas A&M University – Qatar Mechanical Engineering Program DohaDohaQatar

Personalised recommendations