Advertisement

Relative Effects of Porosity and Grain Size on Ultrasonic Wave Propagation in Marbles

Conference paper
Part of the RILEM Bookseries book series (RILEM, volume 6)

Abstract

Grain size determinations by various ultrasonic techniques have been considered by several researches. Among the known methods, the ultrasonic seems to stand out because the method could be used to determine many properties of the materials. In this paper, we investigated that relative effect of porosity, mean grain size on ultrasonic velocity in marbles. We have represented ultrasonic velocity–porosity and porosity-grain size master graph. Using this graph, we have compared mean grain size of marble samples by optic microscope images. The experimental data are compared with the velocity versus porosity curves calculated according to ultrasonic methods. We see that ultrasonic velocity and porosity has showed a linear relation with the mean grain size of samples.

Keywords

Marble Mean grain size Porosity Ultrasounds Ultrasonic Velocity 

References

  1.  [1]
    Prassianakis, I.N. and Prassianakis, N.I. (2004), Ultrasonic testing of non–metallic materials: concrete and marble”, Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 42, 191–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2.  [2]
    Prassianakis, I.N., Kourkoulis, S.K. and Vardoulakis, I. (2000), “Marble monument examination using the NDT method of ultrasounds”, 15th WCNDT, Roma.Google Scholar
  3.  [3]
    Rodríguez–Gordillo, J. and Sáez–Pérez, M.P. (2006), “Effects of thermal changes on Macael marble: Experimental study”, Construction and Building Materials, 20, 355–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4.  [4]
    Corres, M. (1993), From Penteli to Parthenon, Melissa: Athens.Google Scholar
  5.  [5]
    Theocaris, P.S. and Coroneos, E. (1979), “Experimental Study of the Stability of Parthenon”, Publications of the Academy of Athens. 44, 1–80.Google Scholar
  6.  [6]
    Zambas, C. (1994), “Mechanical Properties of Pentelik Marbles”, Athens: Committee for the restoration of Parthenon Publications, Athens.Google Scholar
  7.  [7]
    Fais, S. and Casula, G. (2010), Application of acoustic techniques in the evaluation of ­heterogeneous building materials”, NDT&E International 43, 62–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8.  [8]
    Kumar A. (2003), “Development, characterisation and applications of ultrasonic transducers for NDT”, British Institute of Non-destructive Testing, 45(1), 70–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9.  [9]
    Garnier, V., Chaix, J.F. and Payan, C. (2009), “Improvement of new wave propagation techniques to characterize concrete”, NDTCE’09, Non-Destructive Testing in Civil Engineering Nantes, France.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Nanekar, P.P. and Shah, B.K. (2004), “Characterization of material properties by ultrasonics”, BARC Newsletter, 249. Founder’s Day Spec. Issue.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Balakrishna, S. (1959), “ Ultrasonic velocities in relation to the degree of metamorphism in limestones ”, Proceedings of Mathematical Science., 50(6), 363–365.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Weiss, T., Rasolofosaon, P.N.J. and Siesgesmund, S. (2002), “ Ultrasonic wave velocities as a diagnostic tool for the quality assessment of marble”, London Geological Society, 205, 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Bellopede, R. and Manfredotti, L. (2006), “Ultrasonic sound test on stone: comparison of indirect and direct methods under various test conditions”, Heritage, Weathering and Conservation (HWC).Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Sarpün, İ.H., Tuncel, S. and Ünal, R. (2006), “Mean Grain Size Determination in Marbles by Ultrasonic Techniques”, ECNDT – Fr.1.7.4.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Sarpün, İ.H., Kılıçkaya, M.S. and Tuncel, S. (2005), “Mean grain size determination in marbles by ultrasonic velocity techniques ”. NDT & E International, 38, 21–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Papadakis, E.P. (1976),“ Ultrasonic velocity and attenuation measurement methods with ­scientific and industrial applications”, Physical Acoustics, 12, 277–374.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Gubernatis, J.E. and Domany, E. (1983), “Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation 2”, D.O. Thompson and D.E. Chimenti, Eds., p. 833.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Thompson R.B., Spitzig W.A. and Gray T.A. (1986), “ Relative Effects of Porosity and Grain Size on Ultrasonic Wave Propagation in Iron Compact ”, Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, D.O. Thompson and D.E. Chimenti, Eds., Vol. 5B, 1643–1653.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Physics Dept.Muş Alparslan UniversityMuşTurkey
  2. 2.Physics Dept.Afyon Kocatepe UniversityAfyonkarahisarTurkey
  3. 3.TUBITAK Marmara Research CenterGebzeTurkey

Personalised recommendations