Advertisement

Evolution of NDT Methods for Structures and Materials: Some Successes and Failures

  • C. U. Grosse
Conference paper
Part of the RILEM Bookseries book series (RILEM, volume 6)

Abstract

The development of techniques being used for the non-destructive evaluation of materials and structures is closely related to other disciplines. The examination of human beings in a non-destructive way for example was a goal of many generations of physicians leading to highly developed methods applied today in a routinely manner. Many techniques used in NDE have their equivalent in medical testing. Same is true for geophysics. The exploration for natural resources (e.g. gas, water, oil) and the desire to understand the structure and dynamics of the earth have been strong motors to develop sophisticated methods. It does not matter if one consider reflection seismic, seismology, vibration or electro-magnetic methods: all have their equivalent in the field of NDE of materials and structures. The paper will give some examples of these interconnections and successful adoptions. Since the characteristics of human beings, the earth and engineering structures are different these transitions are somehow limited what will be discussed as well.

Keywords

Evolution Geophysics Medical science Non-destructive techniques 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The help of many colleagues I met through-out the 25 years of my research related to either the geophysical or the NDT community is appreciated. The list of names would be too long to be included here. This particular article is dedicated to the work of Oral Buyukozturk, who contributed in very many ways to the process described above.

References

  1. [1]
    Schwalbe, H.-J., Bamfaste, G., Franke, R.-P. (1999), Non-destructive and non-invasive observation of friction and wear of human joints and of fracture initiation by acoustic emission, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine 213 (1), 41–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Gutenberg, B., Richter, C.F. (1954), Seismicity of the Earth and Associated Phenomena, 2nd ed., Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 17–19.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Turcotte D.L. (1989), A fractal approach to probabilistic seismic hazard assessment. Tectonophysics 167 (2-4), 171–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Shiotani, T., Yuyuma, S., Li, Z., Ohtsu, M. (2001), Application of AE improved b-value to quantitative evaluation of fracture process in concrete materials. Journal of Acoustic Emission 18, 118–133.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Kurz, J.H., Finck, F., Grosse, C.U., Reinhardt, H.W. (2006), Stress drop and stress redistribution in concrete quantified over time by the b-value analysis. Journal of Structural Health Monitoring 5 (1), 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Grosse, C., Ohtsu, M. (Eds.) (2008), Acoustic Emission Testing in Engineering - Basics and Applications. Heidelberg: Springer publ., 404 p.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Hykes, D.L., Hedrick, W.R., Starchman, D.E. (1992), Ultrasound Physics and Instrumen­tation. Mosby-Year Book, 2. ed.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Hartley, H.A. (1958), Audio Design Handbook. New York: Gernsback Library. p. 200.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Wieland, E. (2002), Seismic sensors and their calibration, University of Stuttgart, Internet link, valid 7.11.2010: http://www.geophys.uni-stuttgart.de/oldwww/seismometry/man_html/index.html.
  10. [10]
    Anderson, K.R., Butler, R., Berger, J., Davis, P., Derr, J., Gee, L., Hutt, C.R., Leith, W.S., Park J.J. (2007), 50 years of Global Seismic Observations, AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts 23:1448.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Yu, T.-Y., Büyüköztürk, O. (2007), A far-field airborne radar NDT technique for detecting debonding in GFRP-retrofitted concrete structures, NDT&E International 41, 10–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Aki, K., Richards, P.G. (1980), Quantitative seismology. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Ohtsu, M., Ono, K. (1984), A Generalized Theory of Acoustic Emission and Green’s Functions in a Half Space. Journal of AE 3 (1), 124–133.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Aoi, S., Enescu, B., Suzuki, W., Asano, Y., Obara, K., Kunugi, T., Shiomi, K. (2010), Stress transfer in the Tokai subduction zone from the 2009 Suruga Bay earthquake in Japan. Nature Geoscience 3, 496–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Grosse, C., Finck F. (2006), Quantitative Evaluation of Fracture Processes in Concrete Using Signal-Based Acoustic Emission Techniques. Cement and Concrete Composites 28, 330-336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Dahm, T. (1996), Relative moment tensor inversion based on ray theory: theory and synthetic tests. Geophysical Journal International 124, 245–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Linzer, L.M. (2005), A relative moment tensor inversion technique applied to seismicity induced by mining. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering 38 (2), 81–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Doctor, S.R., Hall, T.E., Reid, L.D. (1986), SAFT - the evolution of a signal processing technology for ultrasonic testing. NDT International 19, 163–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Schickert, M. (2003), Progress in Ultrasonic SAFT-Imaging of Concrete, In: NDT-CE, Berlin: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Zerstörungsfreie Prüfung (DGZfP), BB 85-CD, 2003, V63, 11 p.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Ritter, J. (1996), Ultrasonic Phased Array probes for non-destructive examinations using composite crystal technology, DGZfP, NDTnet - December 1996, Vol.1 No.12.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Oakley, C.G. (1991), Analysis and development of piezoelectric composites for medical ultrasound transducer applications, PhD thesis Pennsylvania State University, PA, USA.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Dudgeon, D. (1977), Fundamentals of digital array processing. Proceedings of the IEEE 65 (6), 898–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    McLaskey, G.C., Glaser, S.D., Grosse, C. (2010), Beamforming array techniques for acoustic emission monitoring of large concrete structures. Journal of Sound & Vibration 329, 2384–2394.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Büyüköztürk, O. (1998), Imaging of concrete structures, NDT&E International 31 (4), 233–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Maierhofer, C., Reinhardt, H.W., Dobmann, G. (Eds.) (2010), Non-destructive evaluation of reinforced concrete structures, Vol. 1 and 2, Cambridge: Woodhead Publ.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Jones, G., Holderied, M.W. (2007), Bat echolocation calls: adaptation and convergent evolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 274 (1612), 905–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Non-destructive Testing Laboratory, Center for Building MaterialsTechnical University of MunichMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations