Abstract
To simulate urban land-use pattern for past and future through constructing spatial model, dynamics analysis of urban land-use pattern to abstract spatial process of urbanization is an important step. Spatial metrics provide good links between urban land-use pattern and process. This research analyzes urban dynamics of Yokohama city at multi-category system and high spatial resolution scale in terms of spatial metrics under the support of the data set “Detailed Digital Information (10 m Grid Land Use) of Metropolitan Area” of Tokyo. The results show that the dynamics are presented well using the spatial metrics at the micro-scale. Comparison of the analysis results between multi-category system and binary-category system is carried out to investigate the difference in presenting urban dynamics in terms of spatial metrics at different spatial scales. The results indicate that the difference in depicting the process of urban dynamics exists at different scales, and analyzing urban dynamics at multi-scale using spatial metrics contributes to comprehensive interpretation of urban dynamics. The analyses also offer useful information for research on selecting metrics in interpretation of urban dynamics.
This chapter is improved from “Yaolong Zhao and Yuji Murayama (2006), Urban dynamics analysis using spatial metrics: A case study of Yokohama city, Tsukuba Geoenvironmental Sciences, 2, 9–18”, with permission from University of Tsukuba, Geoenvironmental Science Program.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alberti, M., & Waddell, P. (2000). An integrated urban development and ecological simulation model. Integrated Assessment, 1, 215–227.
Antrop, M. (2000). Changing patterns in the urbanized countryside of Western Europe. Landscape Ecology, 15, 257–270.
Barnsley, M. J., Moller-Jensen, L., & Barr, S.L. (2001). Inferring urban land use by spatial and structural pattern recognition. In J. P. Donnay, M. J. Barnsley, & P. A. Longley (Eds.), Remote sensing and urban analysis (pp. 115–144). London: Taylor and Francis.
Batty, M. (1989). Urban modeling and planning: Reflections, retrodictions and prescriptions. In B. Macmillan (Ed.), Remodeling geography (pp. 147–169). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Batty, M. (1994). A chronicle of scientific planning: The Anglo-American modeling experience. Journal of the American Planning Association, 60, 7–12.
Batty, M., & Howes, D. (2001). Predicting temporal patterns in urban development from remote imagery. In J. P. Donnay, M. J. Barnsley, & P. A. Longley (Eds.), Remote sensing and urban analysis (pp. 185–204). London: Taylor and Francis.
Clarke, K. C., Hoppen, S., & Gaydos, L. (1997). A self-modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco Bay area. Environment and Planning B, 24, 247–261.
Clarke, K. C., Parks, B. O., & Crane, M. P. (2002). Geographic information systems and environmental modeling. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Dunn, C. P., Sharpe, D. M., Guntensbergen, G. R., Stearns, F., & Yang, Z. (1991). Methods for analyzing temporal changes in landscape pattern. In M. G. Turner & R. H. Gardner (Eds.), Quantitative methods in landscape ecology: The analysis and interpretation of landscape heterogeneity (pp. 173–198). New York: Springer.
Geoghegan, J., Wainger, L. A., & Bockstael, N. E. (1997). Spatial landscape indices in a hedonic framework: An ecological economics analysis using GIS. Ecological Economics, 23, 251–264.
Grimm, N. B., Grove, J. M., Pickett, S. T. A., & Redman, C. L. (2000). Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems. Bioscience, 50, 571–584.
Herold, M., Couclelis, H., & Clarke, K. C. (2005). The role of spatial metrics in the analysis and modeling of urban land use change. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 29, 369–399.
Herold, M., Goldstein, N. C., & Clarke, K. C. (2003). The spatiotemporal form of urban growth: Measurement, analysis and modeling. Remote Sensing of Environment, 86, 286–302.
Lambin, E. F., Turner, B. L., Geist, H. J., Agbola, S. B., Angelsen, A., Bruce, J. W., et al. (2001). The causes of land-use and land-cover change: Moving beyond the myths. Global Environmental Change, 11, 261–269.
Lin, G. C. S., & Ho, S. P. S. (2003). China’s land resources and land-use change: Insights from the 1996 land survey. Land Use Policy, 20, 87–107.
McGarigal, K., Cushman, S. A., Neel, M. C., & Ene, E. (2002). Spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts
McKinney, M. L. (2006). Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biological Conservation, 127, 247–260.
Mendelbrot, B. B. (1983). The fractal geometry of nature. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
Milne, B. T. (1991). Lessons from applying fractal models to landscape patterns. In M. G. Turner & R. H. Gardner (Eds.), Quantitative methods in landscape ecology: The analysis and interpretation of landscape heterogeneity (pp. 199–235). New York: Springer.
Parker, D. C., Evans, T. P., & Meretsky, V. (2001). Measuring emergent properties of agent-based landuse/landcover models using spatial metrics. Proceedings of the 7th annual conference of the international society for computational economics, Yale University.
Paul, M. J., & Meyer, J. L. (2001). Streams in the urban landscape. Annual Review of Ecology Systematics, 32, 333–365.
Qi, Y., & Wu, J. G. (1996). Effects of changing spatial resolution on the results of landscape pattern analysis using spatial autocorrelation indices. Landscape Ecology, 11, 39–49.
Shannon, C., & Weaver, W. (1964). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Torrens, P. M. (2006). Simulating sprawl. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96, 248–275.
Treitz, P., & Rogan, J. (2004). Remote sensing for mapping and monitoring land-cover and land-use change-an introduction. Progress in Planning, 61, 269–279.
Turner, M. G., O’Neill, R. V., Gardner, R. H., & Milne, B. T. (1989). Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology, 3, 153–162.
White, R., Engelen, G., & Uljee, I. (1997). The use of constrained cellular automata for high-resolution modeling of urban land-use dynamics. Environment and Planning B, 24, 323–343.
Wu, J., Jelinski, E. J., Luck, M., & Tueller, P. T. (2000). Multiscale analysis of landscape heterogeneity: Scale variance and pattern metrics. Geographic Information Sciences, 6, 6–19.
Zhao, Y., & Murayama, Y. (2005). Effect characteristics of spatial resolution on the analysis of urban land-use pattern: a case study of CBD in Tokyo using spatial autocorrelation index. In Y. Murayama, & G. Du (Eds.), Cities in global perspective: Diversity and transition (pp. 585–594). Tokyo: IGU Urban Commission.
Zhao, Y., & Murayama, Y. (2006). Effect of spatial scale on urban land-use pattern analysis in different classification systems: An empirical study in the CBD of Tokyo. Theory and Applications of GIS, 14, 29–42.
Acknowledgements
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.40901090, 70863014; Foundation of Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), No.19.07003; Talents Introduced into Universities Foundation of Guangdong Province of China, No. 2009–26.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zhao, Y., Murayama, Y. (2011). Urban Dynamics Analysis Using Spatial Metrics Geosimulation. In: Murayama, Y., Thapa, R. (eds) Spatial Analysis and Modeling in Geographical Transformation Process. GeoJournal Library, vol 100. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0671-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0671-2_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0670-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0671-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)