• Mattias Höjer
  • Anders Gullberg
  • Ronny Pettersson


Traveling or mobility helps people satisfy a number of needs and creates conditions for the households to shape their own activity patterns. Traveling can also serve other functions than the purely logical ones. Travel targets and means both function as social markers and the traveling can also own a value in itself, in that it can offer the concrete possibility of escaping from something or creating an opportunity for recovery and adaptation between different settings.


Public Transport Urban Core Urban Structure Shopping Trip Business Travel 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Åkerman J, Höjer M (2006) How much transport can the climate stand? Sweden on a sustainable path in 2050. Energ Policy 34(14):1944–1957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Åkerman J et al (2000) Destination framtiden: vägar mot ett bärkraftigt transportsystem. KFB-Report 2000:66, Swedish Transport and Communication Research Board, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  3. Berge G, Rundmo T, Stenstadvold M (1992) Velferdsvirkninger af redusert mobilitet. Report 128/1992, The Institute of Transport Economics, OsloGoogle Scholar
  4. Bergman B et al (2002) Hot eller bot? Stadens roll i en hållbar utveckling. FMS report 174, Royal Institute of Technology, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  5. Ellegård K (2004) Vardagslivets valfrihet: om energianvändning, vardagsliv och bebyggelsemönster. In: Blücher G, Graninger G (eds) Krävs energi i samhällsplaneringen? Stiftelsen Vadstena forum för samhällsbyggande, LinköpingGoogle Scholar
  6. Frändberg L (2000) Fritidens globalisering ur ett rörlighetsperspektiv: en kunskapsöversikt. KFB-VINNOVA Report 2000:31, Swedish Transport and Communication Research Board, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  7. Gullberg A, Höjer M, Pettersson R (2007) Bilder av framtidsstaden – tid och rum för hållbar utveckling. Brutus Östlings bokförlag Symposion, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  8. Höjer M (2000) What is the point of IT?: backcasting urban transport and land-use futures. Institutionen för infrastruktur och samhällsplanering, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), StockholmGoogle Scholar
  9. Höjer M (2001) Telecommunicators in the multinuclear city. In: Snickars F, Olerup B, Persson L-O (eds) Reshaping regional planning: a northern perspective. Ashgate, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  10. Höjer M (2002) A hundred nodes in the Stockholm region: a simple calculation of the effects on commuting. Environ Plann B 29(2):197–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Höjer M, Mattsson LG (2000) Determinism and backcasting in future studies. Futures 32(7):613–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. IPCC (1999) Aviation and the global atmosphere. Intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Newman P, Kenworthy J (1999) Sustainability and cities: overcoming automobile dependence. Island, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  14. I SIKA (2005) Luftfart 2004. SIKA statistics 2005:1, Swedish Institute for Transport and Communications Analysis, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  15. Statistics Sweden (2010) Passenger cars in use in counties and by ownership etc at the end of year 2009, Table RSK2,
  16. Steen P et al (1997) Färder i framtiden: transporter i ett bärkraftigt samhälle, KFB-Report 1997:7, Swedish Transport and Communication Research Board, StockholmGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mattias Höjer
    • 1
  • Anders Gullberg
    • 2
  • Ronny Pettersson
    • 3
  1. 1.Centre for Sustainable CommunicationsRoyal Institute of TechnologyStockholmSweden
  2. 2.Committee for Stockholm ResearchStockholmSweden
  3. 3.Department of Economic HistoryStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations