Accompanying document to the proposal for a Council Framework Decision on the use of Passenger Name Record (PNR) for law enforcement purposes from 12 November 2007 – impact assessment, 2007/0237 (CNS), 14922/07.
Additional protocol to the Convention for the protection of individuals with regard to automatic processing of personal data regarding supervisory authorities and transborder data flows from 2004.
Agreement between the European Community and the Government of Canada on the processing of Advanced Passenger Information and Passenger Name Record data, OJ 2006, L-82/15.
Agreement between the European Union and the United States of America on the processing and transfer of Passenger Name Record (PNR) data by air carriers to the Unites States Department of Homeland Security (DHS), OJ 2007, L-204/18.
Annual report 2009 of the European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation, Eurocontrol, http://www.eurocontrol.int/epr/public/standard_page/AnnualReport.html (accessed August 25, 2010).
Brouwer, E. “Towards a European PNR system? Questions on the added value and the protection of fundamental rights,” study requested by the European Parliament’s Committee on civil liberties, justice and home affairs (LIBE) (2009).
Bundesverfassungsgericht, 1 BvR 518/02, Judgment on governmental profiling of the German Constitutional Court.
Bundesverfassungsgericht, 2 March 2010, 1 BvR 256/08, judgment related to the implementation of the Data Retention Directive.
Bundesverfassungsgericht, Volkszählungsurteil, BVerfGE 65, 1, Census decision of the German Constitutional Court.
Case C-301/06 Ireland v. Parliament and Council  ECR I-593.
Convention No. 108 of the Council of Europe for the protection of individuals with regard to automatic processing of personal data from 28 January 1981.
Council Directive 2004/82/EC of 29 April 2004 on the obligation of air carriers to communicate passenger data, OJ 2004, L-261/24.
Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA of 27 November 2008 on the protection of personal data in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, OJ 2008, L-350/60.
Council Framework Decision on Combating Terrorism, OJ 2002 L-164/03.
Council Framework Decision on the European Arrest Warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States, OJ 2002, L-190/1.
Curtea Constitutionala, 8 October 2009 number 1258, Romanian Official Monitor no. 789 of 23 November 2009, judgment related to the implementation of the Data Retention Directive.
De Hert, P., and R. Bellanova. “Data protection from a transatlantic perspective: The EU and US move towards an international data protection agreement?” study requested by the European Parliament’s Committee on civil liberties, justice and home affairs (LIBE) (2008).
De Vries, K., R. Bellanova, and P. de Hert“Proportionality overrides Unlimited Surveillance, The German Constitutional Court Judgment on Data Retention”, Centre of European Policy Studies, Liberty and Security in Europe, (2010), http://www.ceps.eu/book/proportionality-overrides-unlimited-surveillance (accessed August 25, 2010).
Directive 2006/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the retention of data generated or processed in connection with the provision of publicly available electronic communications services or of public communications networks and amending Directive 2002/58/EC, OJ 2006, L-105/54.
Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, OJ 1995, L-281/31.
Directive 97/66/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 1997 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the telecommunications sector, OJ 1998, L-24/1.
ECtHR, Amann v. Switzerland, Application no. 27798/95 from 16 February 2000.
ECtHR, Association for European Integration and Human Rights and Ekimdzhiev v. Bulgaria, Application no. 62540/00 from 28 June 2007.
ECtHR, Biriuk v Lithuania, Application no. 23373/03 from 25 November 2008.
ECtHR, C.C. v. Spain, Application no. 1425/06 from 6 October 2009.
ECtHR, C.G. and others
v. Bulgaria, Application no. 1365/07 from 24 April 2008.
ECtHR, Copland v. the United Kingdom, Application no. 62617/00 from 3 April 2007.
ECtHR, I. v Finland Application no. 20511/03 from 17 July 2008.
ECtHR, K.U. v. Finland, Application no. 2871/02 from 2 December 2008.
ECtHR, Kennedy v. the United Kingdom, Application no. 26839/05 from 18 May 2010.
ECtHR, L.L. v France Application no. 7508/02 from 10 October 2006.
ECtHR, Leander v. Sweden, Application no. 9248/81 from 26 March 1987.
ECtHR, Liberty and others v. the United Kingdom, Application no. 58234/00 from 1 July 2008.
ECtHR, Malone v. the United Kingdom, Application no. 8691/79 from 2 August 1984.
ECtHR, Panteleyenko v. Ukraine, Application no. 11901/02 from 29 June 2006.
ECtHR, Peck v. United Kingdom, Application no. 44647/98 from 28 January 2003.
ECtHR, Rotaru against Romania, Application no. 28341/95 from 4 May 2000.
ECtHR, S. and Marper v the United Kingdom, Application nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04 from 4 December 2008.
ECtHR, Segerstedt-Wiberg and others v. Sweden, Application no. 62332/00 from 6 June 2006.
ECtHR, Silver v. the United Kingdom, Application no. 5947/72 and others, from 25 March 1983.
ECtHR, Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom, Application no. 6538/74.
ECtHR, Valenzuela v. Spain, Application no. 27671/95 from 30 July 1998.
ECtHR, Weber and Saravia v. Germany, Application no. 54934/00 Admissibility Decision from 29 June 2006.
ECtHR, Z. v Finland, Application no. 22009/93, from 25 February 1997.
Edward Hasbrouck Blog, http://www.hasbrouck.org/ (accessed August 25, 2010).
EU-PNR proposal in its latest version, Council doc. 5618/2/09, interinstitutional file 2007/0237 (CNS) from 29 June 2009.
European Data Protection Supervisor, Opinion on the draft proposal for a Council Framework Decision on the use of Passenger Name records (PNR) for law enforcement purposes, OJ 2008, C-110/01.
European Parliament, Resolution of 20 November 2008 on the proposal for a Council Framework Decision on the use of Passenger Name records (PNR) for law enforcement purposes, B6-0615/2008.
Joined cases C-317/04 and C-318/04, Parliament v. Council, , ECR I-4721.
Manolea, B. “Implementation of EU Data Retention Directive Unconstitutional.” Computer Law Review International 2 (2010): 49–51.
Mendez, M. “Passenger Name Record Agreement, European Court of Justice.” European Constitutional Law Review 3 (2007): 127–147.
Opinion of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights on the Proposal for a Council Framework Decision on the use of Passenger Name Record (PNR) data for law enforcement purposes, 28 October 2008.
Papakonstantinou, V., and P. De Hert. “The PNR Agreement and Transatlantic anti-terrorism Cooperation: No firm human rights framework on either side of the Atlantic.” Common Market Law Review 46, 3 (2009): 885–919.
Pawlak, P. “Made in USA? The influence of the US on the EU’s data protection regime,” Centre of European Policy Studies, Liberty and Security in Europe, Justice and Home Affairs section, (2009), http://www.ceps.be/book/made-usa-influence-us-eu%E2%80%99s-data-protection-regime (accessed August 25, 2010).
Peers, S. “The Third Pillar acquis after the Treaty of Lisbon enters into force” comment posted on December 1, 2009, http://www.statewatch.org/analyses/86-third-pillar-acquis-post-lisbon.pdf (accessed August 25, 2010).
Proposal for a Council Framework Decision on the use of Passenger Name Record (PNR) for law enforcement purposes from 6 November 2007, COM (2007) 654.
Recommendation R (87) 15 of the Committee of Ministers to the Member States regulating the use of personal data in the police sector, adopted 17 September 1987.
Siemen, B. Datenschutz als europäisches Grundrecht. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2006.
Simitis, S. “Der EuGH und die Vorratsdatenspeicherung oder die verfehlte Kehrtwende bei der Kompetenzregelung.” Neue Juristische Wochenzeitschrift 25 (2009): 1782–1786.