The Noise in the Archive: Oblivion in the Age of Total Recall

Chapter

Abstract

The convergence of pervasive forms of data collection, widespread deployment of cheap digital sensors, and economics of infinite storage is apparently leading us into an age of perfect remembering where “everyone is on the record all the time.” This paper investigates the figure of a future bereft of oblivion by confronting two widely discussed statements on the changing condition of memory, Gordon Bell’s Total Recall, and Viktor Mayer-Schönberger’s Delete. I argue that in spite of their antagonistic conclusions, both authors share an intellectual commitment to the unique historical status of digital information as immaterial, and thus, impervious to the noise, decay, and distortion that analogue carriers have previously brought to the task of preserving memory. I conclude that whatever the future of the past may be, digital information cannot, in fact, escape its material foundations, and will inevitably bring to the table its own particular sets of possibilities and constraints to the business of remembering and oblivion.

Keywords

Personal Information Digital Medium Digital Information Digital Archive Retention Period 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Agre, P. “Beyond The Mirror World: Privacy and The Representational Practices of Computing.” In Technology and Privacy: The New Landscape, edited by P. Agre and M. Rotenberg, 29–61. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  2. Barlow, J.P. “A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace.” https://projects.eff.org/~barlow/Declaration-Final.html (accessed May 28, 2010).Google Scholar
  3. Bell, G., and J. Gemmel. Total Recall: How the E-Memory Revolution will Change Everything. New York, NY: Dutton, 2009.Google Scholar
  4. Bell, G., and J. Gemmel. “A Digital Life.” Scientific American (March 2007): 58–65.Google Scholar
  5. Bindman, D. “Bribing The Vote Of Fame: Eighteenth-Century Monuments And The Futility Of Commemoration.” In The Art of Forgetting, edited by A. Forty and S. Küchler, 93–105. Oxford: Berg, 1999.Google Scholar
  6. Blanchette, J.-F., and D. Johnson. “Data Retention and the Panoptic Society: The Social Benefits of Forgetfulness.” The Information Society 18 (2002): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowker, G.C. Memory Practices in the Sciences. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2005.Google Scholar
  8. Burton, J. “Bergson’s Non-Archival Theory of Memory.” Memory Studies 1 (2008): 321–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carruthers, M.J. The Book of Memory: A Study of Memory in Medieval Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  10. Dijck, J.v. Mediated Memories in the Digital Age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
  11. Drucker, J. SpecLab: Digital Aesthestics and Projects in Speculative Computing. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2009.Google Scholar
  12. Forty, A. “Introduction.” In The Art of Forgetting, edited by A. Forty and S. Küchler, 1–18. Oxford: Berg, 1999.Google Scholar
  13. Gandy, O.H. The Panoptic Sort: A Political Economy of Personal Information. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  14. Gelernter, D. Mirror Worlds: Or the Day Software Puts the Universe in a Shoebox … How It Will Happen and What It Will Mean. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  15. Gitelman, L. Always Already New: Media, History, and the Data of Culture. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2006.Google Scholar
  16. Hedrick, C.W. History and Silence: Purge and Rehabilitation of Memory in Late Antiquity. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  17. Kirsch, D.A. “The Record of Business and the Future of Business History: Establishing a Public Interest in Private Business Records.” Library Trends 57 (2009): 352–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kirschenbaum, M.G. Mechanisms: New Media and the Forensic Imagination. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2008.Google Scholar
  19. Mahoney, M.S. “The History of Computing in the History of Technology.” Annals of the History of Computing 10 (1988): 113–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mayer-Schönberger, V. DELETE: The Virtue of Forgetting in the Digital Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
  21. Negroponte, N. Being Digital. New York, NY: Vintage, 1996.Google Scholar
  22. Nordmann, A. “Singular Simplicity.” IEEE Spectrum 45, 6 (June 2008): 60–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nye, D. American Technological Sublime. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  24. Pringree, G.B., and L. Gitelman. “Introduction: What’s New About New Media.” In New Media 1740-1915, edited by L. Gitelman and G.B. Pringree, xi–xxii. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2003.Google Scholar
  25. Rosenheim, S.J. The Cryptographic Imagination: Secret Writing from Edgar Poe to the Internet. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  26. Thompson, C. “A Head for Detail.” Fast Company 73–79(November 2006): 110–112.Google Scholar
  27. Wilkinson, A. “Remember This?” The New Yorker (May 28, 2007): 38–44.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information Studies, UCLALos AngelesUS

Personalised recommendations