Advertisement

Rise and Phall: Lessons from the Phorm Saga

  • Paul Bernal
Chapter

Abstract

The saga of Phorm’s Webwise behavioural targeting system, has been fraught with problems: legal challenges, technical disputes, serial campaigning, police action, EU action, smear campaigns and propaganda. Until the spring of 2009 it had looked as though Phorm would succeed, with the UK government firmly behind it, three of the biggest ISP’s planning to use its service, an endorsement of sorts from noted privacy advocates and guarded approval from the Information Commissioner’s Office. Then, however, things began to fall apart, and by the autumn of 2009 Phorm’s business model was in tatters. Why did this happen, and what lessons need to be learned? This chapter looks at the Phorm saga through the lens of Symbiotic Regulation, and suggests that Phorm’s apparent failure has been a result of their failure to understand the complexity of the regulatory matrix. In particular, Phorm underestimated the views of user-groups and digital rights advocates – and the influence and effect those views could have. The saga has many losers – as well as Phorm itself, the UK government and the ISPs all come out the worse for wear. This chapter suggests how much of this could have been avoided.

Keywords

Regulatory Matrix Business Idea Behavioural Target Privacy Advocate Information Commissioner 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper is based on research for my doctorate funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council.

References

  1. All Party Parliamentary Communications Group (apComms), “Can We Keep Our Hands off the Net?” Report of an Inquiry by the All Party Parliamentary Communications Group, October 2009. Available at: http://www.apcomms.org.uk/uploads/apComms_Final_Report.pdf
  2. Bernal, P.A. “Web 2.5: The Symbiotic Web.” International Review of Law, Computers & Technology 24 (2010), 25–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bohm, N. “The Phorm “Webwise” System – a Legal Analysis.” Foundation for Information Policy Research, (2008). http://www.fipr.org/080423phormlegal.pdf
  4. Clayton, R, “The Phorm “Webwise” System” (2008). http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rnc1/080518-phorm.pdf:
  5. Murray, A. D. The Regulation of Cyberspace: Control in the Online Environment, Milton Park, Abingdon, UK, 2006; New York, NY, Routledge-Cavendish.Google Scholar
  6. Turow, J., King, J., Hoofnagle, C. J., Bleakley, A. & Hennessy, M. “Americans Reject Tailored Advertising and Three Activities that Enable It.” Annenberg: University of Pennsylvania, 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1478214
  7. Note: All web references throughout the article accessed 18th May 2010Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Information Technology LawUniversity of East AngliaNorwichUK
  2. 2.London School of Economics and Political ScienceLondonUK

Personalised recommendations