Skip to main content

Re-construction and Conceptual Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 951 Accesses

Part of the book series: Analecta Husserliana ((ANHU,volume 108))

Abstract

Traditionally transcendental logic had to deal with the conditions of possibility of judgements, which were presupposed by formal logic. Defined as a purely philosophical enterprise transcendental logic was considered as being a priori delivering either analytic or even synthetic a priori result. In this paper it is argued that this separation from the (empirical) cognitive sciences should be given up. Transcendental logic should be understood as focusing on specific questions. Transcendental logic properly understood, and redefined, should concern itself with the (formal) re-construction of the presupposed necessary conditions and rules of linguistic communication in general. It aims at universality and reflexive closure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bremer, M. 2005. An Introduction to paraconsistent logics. Bern et al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R. 1933. Logische syntax der sprache. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. 1974. On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. 1929. Formale und transzendentale Logik. Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmann, W. 1985. Reflexive Letztbegründung. Freiburg/München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T. 1986. The view from nowhere, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, E. 1996. Without good reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, P.F. 1959. Individuals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Terman, F. 1993. Reflective Equilibrium. Karlshamn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodruff-Smith, D., and Thomasson, A. eds. 2005. Phenomenology and philosophy of mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuel Bremer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bremer, M. (2011). Re-construction and Conceptual Analysis. In: Tymieniecka, AT. (eds) Transcendentalism Overturned. Analecta Husserliana, vol 108. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0624-8_35

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics