Abstract
Individual learns based on his/her intuitions, emotions, thoughts and experiences. Learning, just as breathing, is a vital and continuous process in life. Learning, which can be defined as “the phenomenological way of acquisition of knowledge”, is the natural way of learning for individual. Furthermore, phenomenological learning is the easiest and the most effective way of learning for individual. It is a kind of thinking and perceiving style with a structure peculiar to individual. Learning styles are unique ways which are inimitable. The uniqueness of learning styles derives from the uniqueness of in Learning styles and learning preferences of individuals have recently been the most individual. Learning styles and learning preferences of individuals have recently the most contemporary and the most important issues in the filed of learning. Learning style is defined as the type of learning unique to the individual himself/herself. However, the claim that learning styles are connected with phenomenological learning is not clear. Most of the studies carried out by experts in educational sciences put forward the educational system’s implementations that are inconsistent with the phenomenological learning, the natural way of learning for the individual. This inconsistency is the source of some problems about learning in the education system. Thus, in the studies about the learning style, degradation of the education phenomenon from social dimension to individual dimension is essential. Discussions in the field of phenomenology can be claimed to be effective in terms of the change in the idea regarding individual’s learning. New information about individual’s learning can be acquired by use of the phenomenological method. Inquiry through the phenomenological method means that existent information about learning can be perceived and interpreted from a new perspective. Many dimensions that are obscure, skipped and invisible can appear by means of interpretations of learning. This new search may affect individual’s life by contributing to the realization of discussions about individual’s learning and the opening of emergence new prospects of phenomenological learning method.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Cozma, C. 2007. On ethical in the phenomenology of life. Roma: Edizioni Eucos.
Churchill, S.D. 2006. Encountering the animal other: Reflections on moments of empathic seeing. The indo-pacific journal of phenomenology 6:1–13.
Garrison, D.R., and Anderson, T. 2003. E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. London: Routledge Falmer.
Kurenkova, R.A. et al. 2000. The methodologies of life, self-individualization and creativity in educational process. In Analecta Husserliana LXVII, ed. Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka, 195–205. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Mardas, N. 2003. Following the golden thread: A journey through the labyrinth of Tymieniecka’s logos and life. In Phenomenological Inquiry, vol. 27, October, ed. A.-T. Tymieniecka, 35–62. Hannover: The World Institute for Advencied Phenomenological Resaserch and Learning.
McPhail, J.C. 1995. Phenomenology as philosophy and method. Remedial & Special Education 16 (3): 159–166.
Natanson, M. 1989. Introduction. In Phenomenology and the Social Science, ed. M. Natanson, 3–44. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Neil, B. 1979. Phenomenology and education. British Journal of Educational Studies 27(3): 25–258.
Rau, A. 2008. Anarchic educational leadership: an alternative approach to postgraduate supervision. The indo-pacific journal of phenomenology 8: 1–17.
Selvi, K. 2006a. Phenomenology of lifelong learning. In Analecta Husserliana XC, ed. A.-T. Tymieniecka, 483–500. Dordrecht: Springer.
Selvi, K. 2006b. Learning and creativity. In Analecta Husserliana: The Yearbook of Phenomenological Research, vol. XCIII, ed. A.T. Tymienecka, 351–369. Dordrecht: Springer.
Selvi, K. 2007. Phenomenological approach in education. In Analecta Husserliana: The Yearbook of Phenomenological Research, vol. XCV, ed. A.T. Tymienecka, 34–47. Dordrecth: Springer.
Szmyd, R. 2005. Modern civilization in the paradigm of educational thought. In Phenomenological Inquiry, vol. 29, ed. A.-T. Tymieniecka, 15–28. Hannover: The World Institute for Advencied Phenomenological Resaserch and Learning.
Tjellander, B. 2000. The construction of the concept the omnividual. In Analecta Husserliana LXVI, ed. A.-T. Tymieniecka, 131–155. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Tymieniecka, A.T. 2004. Impetus and equipoise in the life-strategies of reason. In Phenomenological Inquiry, vol. 26, ed. A.-T. Tymieniecka, 1–35. Hannover: The World Institute for Advencied Phenomenological Resaserch and Learning.
Vandenberg, D. 2002. Phenomenology and fundamental educational theory. In Analecta Husserliana LXXX, ed. A.-T. Tymieniecka, 589–601. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Selvi, K. (2011). Phenomenological Learning in Our Living Reality. In: Tymieniecka, AT. (eds) Transcendentalism Overturned. Analecta Husserliana, vol 108. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0624-8_34
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0624-8_34
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0623-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0624-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)