The Benefits from Using Professionally Developed Models of Possible Hazardous Materials Accident Scenarios in Crime Scene Investigations

  • Damir Kulišić
Conference paper
Part of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security book series (NAPSC, volume 2)


Without the possibility of preliminary professional analysis of possible versions of scenarios of more complex accidents with hazardous materials, each crime scene investigation of causes and forensically relevant circumstances of their occurrence can be nearly impossible, with irreparable and fatal failures of securing the crime scene and in all phases of crime scene investigation process. The author analyzes some of the (possible) hazardous materials major accidents (with examples from Croatia) and explains the importance for investigation of easily accessible professionally made and updated some key documents. This includes documents of health, safety and security (HSS) hazards analysis and risk assessment, plans and programs for prevention and protection as well as plans for emergency preparedness and response, for all those companies that manufacture, store or transport hazardous materials. Police ability to locate documents and provide professional insight regarding investigations enables adequate forensic exchange of expert information among members of crime scene investigation teams and helps the quality planning of phases and procedures of crime scene investigation according to available knowledge about relevant features of the accident under investigation. This way, there will be less possibility of losing key evidence, redundant investigation procedures/costs, unnecessary dealing with less important parts of procedural, technical and operative documentation. It is necessary to update current education programs for all accident investigators. Analytical methods, techniques and software tools used for making those professional documents can be of great help in searching, finding and testing logical connections of relevant macro- and micro-traces at the scene of accident with other important clues.


Hazardous Material Hazardous Substance Crime Scene Criminal Investigation Safety Report 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. API (2005) Security guidelines for the petroleum industry. American Petroleum Institute (API), Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrs FG, Lynch ML (2004) Environmental crime: a sourcebook. LFB Scholarly Publishing, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Bragdon CR, Bennett JCW, Bruno TA, Cook CA, James SR, Jensen T et al. (2008) In: Bragdon CR (ed) Transportation security. Butterworth-Heinemann, Burlington/Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  4. Cavani F, Centi G, Perathoner S, Trifiró S (2009) Sustainable industrial processes. WILEY-VCH, WeinheimCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Čavrak B (1995) Eko-terorizam: zračni napad na Proizvodni pogon mineralnih gnojiva “INA – Petrokemija” Kutina (Hrvatska) u kolovozu 1995 (Eng. Eco-terrorism: air-raid on mineral fertilizers production plant at “INA – Petrokemija” Kutina (Croatia) in August, 1995). Safety, Security and Environmental Protection Department, ZagrebGoogle Scholar
  6. CCPS (2003) Guidelines for investigating chemical process incidents. Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS), American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE), New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. CETU (2005) Guide to road tunnel safety documentation: risk analyses relating to dangerous goods transport. Centre d′Etudes des Tunnels/Tunnel Study Centre, Bron CedexGoogle Scholar
  8. Clements BW (2009) Disasters and public health: planning and response. Elsevier/Butterworth-Heinemann, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  9. Cooper H, Baker P (2010) U.S. opens criminal inquiry into oil spill. The New York Times (NYT), 1 June 2010Google Scholar
  10. Cooper H, Broder JM (2010) BP’s ties to agency are long and complex. The New York Times (NYT), 25 May 2010Google Scholar
  11. Cozzani V, Gubinelli G, Salzano E (2006) Escalation thresholds in the assessment of domino accidental events. J Hazard Mater 129(1–3):1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. CRAIM/UNEP (2002) Risk management guide for major industrial accidents (Intended for municipalities and industries). Council for Reducing Major Industrial Accidents/Conseil pour la réduction des accidents industriels majeurs (CRAIM), MontréalGoogle Scholar
  13. Crowl DA, Louvar JF (2002) Chemical process safety: fundamentals with applications (Prentice Hall International Series in the Physical and Chemical Engineering Sciences), 2nd edn. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  14. EC (1996) Council Directive 96/82/EC of 9 December 1996 on the control of major- accident hazards involving dangerous substances. Off J Eur Communities L 010:13–33Google Scholar
  15. EC (1998) Directive 98/8/EC of 16 February 1998 concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market. Off J Eur Communities L 123:1–63Google Scholar
  16. EC (2006) Regulation No. 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No. 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No. 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC. Off J Eur Union L 396:1–849Google Scholar
  17. EEC (1967) Council Directive 67/548/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances. Off J Eur Union 196:1–98Google Scholar
  18. EEC (1993) Commission Directive 93/67/EEC of 20 July 1993 laying down the principles for the assessment of risks to man and the environment of substances notified in accordance with Council Directive 67/548/EEC. Off J Eur Union 227:9–17Google Scholar
  19. EEC (1994) Commission Regulation (EC) No. 1488/94 of 28 June 1994 laying down the principles for the assessment of risks to man and the environment of existing substances in accordance with council regulation (EEC) No. 793/93. Off J Eur Union L 161:3–11Google Scholar
  20. EUR 20418 (2003) Technical Guidance Document on Risk Assessment in support of: Commission Directive 93/67/EEC on Risk Assessment for new notified substances; Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 on Risk Assessment for Existing Substances; Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Placing of Biocidal Products on the Market (TGD, Part 1–4), 2nd edn. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, LuxemburgGoogle Scholar
  21. In: Fabbri L, Struckl M, Wood M (eds)Google Scholar
  22. Garrick JB, Christie RF, Hornberger GM, Kilger M, Stetkar JW (2008) In: Garrick JB (ed) Quantifying and controlling catastrophic risks. Academic/Elsevier, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Gledhill J, Lines I (1998) Development of methods to assess the significance of domino effects from major hazard sites (Contract Research Report 183/1998). Health and Safety Executive Books, SudburyGoogle Scholar
  24. Gordon R, Flin R, Mearns K (2005) Designing and evaluating a Human Factors Investigation Tool (HFIT) for accident analysis. Saf Sci 43(3):147–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grossi P, Kunreuther H (eds) (2005) Catastrophe modelling: a new approach to managing risk. Huebner international series on risk, insurance, and economic security. Springer, BostonGoogle Scholar
  26. Gunn AM (2008) Encyclopedia of disasters: environmental catastrophes and human tragedies, vol 1–2. Greenwood Press, WestportGoogle Scholar
  27. Herrmann DS (2002) A practical guide to security engineering and information assurance. Auerbach/CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  28. Hommel G (2010) Handbuch der gefährliche Güter, 24th edn. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  29. HSE RR509 (2006) Plant ageing: management of equipment containing hazardous fluids or pressure (Research Report 509). Health and Safety Executive (HSE), Colegate (Norwich, UK)Google Scholar
  30. ICPO-OICP (2007) Illegal oil discharges from vessels: investigative manual. ICPO- OICP Interpol Communication and Publications Office, LyonGoogle Scholar
  31. Kletz T (2009) What went wrong? – Case histories of process plant disasters and how they could have been avoided, 5th edn. Gulf Professional Publishing, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  32. Koehler SA, Brown PA (2010) Forensic epidemiology (International Forensic Science and Investigation Series). CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  33. Körvers PMW (2004) Accident precursors: pro-active identification of safety risks in the chemical process industry. Dissertation, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, EindhovenGoogle Scholar
  34. Kristof ND (2010) New alarm bells about chemicals and cancer, NYT, 5 May 2010Google Scholar
  35. Kulišić D (1992) Eksplozijske i požarne opasnosti od velikih količina amonij-nitrata i nekih njegovih smjesa - I. dio (Eng. Explosion and fire risks of great quantities of the ammonium nitrate and its mixtures – part I). Policija i sigurnost 1(49):322–337Google Scholar
  36. Kulišić D (1997) Sabotaže i diverzije. (Eng. Sabotages and subversions). Policija i sigurnost 6(1–2):57–131Google Scholar
  37. Kulišić D (1998) Uzroci nezgoda, nesreća, požara i eksplozija: Prijedlog sustava razvrstavanja uzroka požara, eksplozija, havarija i nesreća pri radu tehnološke naravi (Eng. Causes of accidents, disasters, fires and explosions: a proposition of a classification of causes of fire, explosions, damages and disasters in technological processes). Sigurnost 40(2):95–121Google Scholar
  38. Kulišić D (2008a) Mjere sigurnosti od terorističkih i inih zlonamjernih ugroza kritične infrastrukture – II. dio (Eng. Measures of prevention from terrorist and other malicious activities of critical infrastructure – part II). Sigurnost 50(4):343–364Google Scholar
  39. Kulišić D (2008b) Požarne i eksplozijske opasnosti u prijevozu opasnih tvari (Eng. Fire and explosion hazards of dangerous goods transport). In: Javorović A, Kovačić N, Kralj R (eds) Zbornik radova stručnog savjetovanja “Novi zakon o prijevozu opasnih tvari – cestovni i zračni promet” (Eng. Proceedings of the professional conference “New Transport of Dangerous Goods Act”). Biblioteka Sigurnost Educa, Zagreb, pp 9–32Google Scholar
  40. Kulišić D (2008c) Mjere sigurnosti od terorističkih i inih zlonamjernih ugroza kritične infrastrukture – I. dio: Kako prepoznati i ugraditi nedostajuće mjere prevencije od terorističkih i drugih zlonamjernih aktivnosti u sustavu kritične infrastrukture (Eng. Measures of prevention from terrorist and other malicious activities of critical infrastructure – part I: how to recognize and build in missing measures of prevention from terrorist and other malicious activities into the systems of critical infrastructure.). Sigurnost 50(3):201–226Google Scholar
  41. Kulišić D (2009) Opće mjere sigurnosti i zaštite pri skladištenju i rukovanju sa sigurnosno posebno zanimljivim opasnim tvarima (Eng. General safety and protection measures during storing and using hazardous materials, especially interesting for security issues). In: Kralj R, Javorović A (eds) Zbornik radova Stručnog savjetovanja “Prijevoz opasnih tvari – ADR 2009.” (Eng. Proceedings of the professional conference “Transport of dangerous goods – ADR 2009”). Biblioteka Sigurnost Educa, Zagreb, pp 21–50, Posebno izdanje/Special editionGoogle Scholar
  42. Kulišić D, Magušić F (2007) O aktualnim općim pristupima i elementima za raščlambe opasnosti od zlonamjernih ugroza sigurnosti prometnih tokova (Eng. About current general approaches to and elements of danger analysis in cases of malicious endangerment of traffic routes). Policija i sigurnost 16(1–2):41–66Google Scholar
  43. Lancaster JF (2005) Engineering catastrophes: causes and effects of major accidents, 3rd edn. CRC Press/Woodhead Publishing, Boca Raton/CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Landoll DJ (2006) The security risk assessment handbook: a complete guide for performing security risk assessments. Auerbach/Taylor & Francis Group, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  45. Lewis RJ (ed) (2004) Sax’s dangerous properties of industrial materials, vol 1–3, 11th edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Macaulay T (2009) Critical infrastructure: understanding its component parts, vulnerabilities, operating risks, and interdependencies. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  47. Maguire R (2006) Safety cases and safety reports: meaning, motivation and management. Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot, HampshireGoogle Scholar
  48. Margossian N (2006) Risques et ccidents industriels majeurs: Caractéristiques, réglementation, prévention. Dunod, ParisGoogle Scholar
  49. Marshall VC (1987) Major chemical hazards. Ellis Horwood, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  50. McDonald R (2003) Introduction to natural and man-made disasters and their effects on buildings. Architectural Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  51. Medard LA (1989) Accidental explosions, vol 1–2. Ellis Horwood, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  52. Morrison R (1999) Environmental forensics: principles and applications. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  53. Mudge SM (2008) Methods in environmental forensics. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Murphy BL, Morrison RD (2007) Introduction to environmental forensics, 2nd edn. Elsevier Academic, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  55. Nacionalna strategija kemijske sigurnosti (2008) (Eng. National strategy for chemical safety). Službeni list Republike Hrvatske, br. 143/2008Google Scholar
  56. Nacionalna strategija za prevenciju i suzbijanje terorizma (2008) (Eng. National strategy for prevention of terrorism and for counterterrorism). Službeni list Republike Hrvatske, br. 139/2008Google Scholar
  57. Nacionalna strategija zaštite okoliša (2002) (Eng. National strategy for environment protection). Službeni list Republike Hrvatske, br. 46/2002Google Scholar
  58. Newton M (2008) The encyclopedia of crime scene investigation. Facts On File, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  59. NFPA (2008) Fire protection handbook, vol 1–2, 12th edn. National Fire Protection Association, QuincyGoogle Scholar
  60. NRC (2006) Terrorism and the chemical infrastructure: protecting people and reducing vulnerabilities. National Research Council (NRC), Committee on Assessing Vulnerabilities Related to the Nation’s Chemical Infrastructure. The National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  61. OECD (2003) OECD guiding principles for chemical accident prevention, preparedness and response, 2nd edn. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), ParisGoogle Scholar
  62. Owen C, Béguin P, Wackers G, Rosness R, Norros L, Nuutinen M et al (2009) In: Owen C, Béguin P, Wackers G (eds) Risky work environments: reappraising human work within fallible systems. Ashgate Publishing, Farnham, SurreyGoogle Scholar
  63. Paik JK, Melchers RE (eds) (2008) Condition assessment of aged structures. CRC Press/Woodhead Publishing, Boca Raton/CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  64. Piquero AR, Weisburd D, Addington LA, Apel RJ, Ariel B, Berk R et al. (2010) In: Piquero AR, Weisburd D (eds) Handbook of Quantitative Criminology. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  65. Pravilnik o izradi procjene ugroženosti od požara i tehnološke eksplozije (1994) (Eng. Rulebook on drafting fire and technological explosions risk assessment). Službeni list Republike Hrvatske, br. 35/1994, 110/2005, 28/2010Google Scholar
  66. Pravilnik o metodologiji za izradu procjena ugroženosti i planova zaštite i spašavanja (2008) (Eng. Rulebook on methodology for risk assessment and plans for the protection and rescue). Službeni list Republike Hrvatske, br. 38/2008Google Scholar
  67. Pravilnik o registru postrojenja u kojima je utvrđena prisutnost opasnih tvari i o očevidniku prijavljenih velikih nesreća (2008) (Eng. Rulebook on inventory of the dangerous substances present in the ′Seveso Establishment′ and on information to be supplied by the operator following a major accident). Službeni list Republike Hrvatske, br. 113/2008Google Scholar
  68. Pravilnika o sadržaju plana zaštite od požara i tehnoloških eksplozija (1994) (Eng. Rulebook on the content of fire and technological explosion protection plan). Službeni list Republike Hrvatske, br. 35/1994, 55/1994Google Scholar
  69. Ramachandran V, Raghuram AC, Krishnan RV, Bhaumik SK (2005) Failure analysis of engineering structures: methodology and case histories. ASM International, Materials ParkGoogle Scholar
  70. Rasmussen J, Svendung I (2000) Pro-active risk management in a dynamic society. Swedish Rescue Services Agency, KarlstadGoogle Scholar
  71. Reid RN (2005) Facility managers guide to security. Fairmont Press, LilburnGoogle Scholar
  72. Kazneni zakon Republike Hrtvaske (1997) (Eng. Criminal code of the Republic of Croatia). Službeni list Republike Hrvatske, br. 110/1997, 27/1998, 50/2000, 129/2000, 51/2001, 111/2003, 190/2003, 105/2004, 84/2005, 71/2006, 110/2007, 152/2008Google Scholar
  73. Richardson M (1995) Effects of war on the environment: Croatia. E & FN Spon/Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  74. Sanders RE (2005) Chemical process safety: learning from case histories, 3rd edn. Elsevier Butterworth–Heinemann, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  75. Smith DJ (2001) Reliability, maintainability and risk: practical methods for engineers, 6th edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  76. Spurgin AJ (2010) Human reliability assessment: theory and practice. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  77. Uhlmann DM (2010) Prosecuting crimes against the earth. The New York Times (NYT), 3 June 2010Google Scholar
  78. UNECE (2009) Globally Harmonized System of classification and labelling of chemicals (GHS),Third revised edition, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). Accessed 28 May 2010Google Scholar
  79. UNEP (2000) TransAPELL guidance for dangerous goods transport emergency planning in local community (Technical Report 35). United Nations Environment Programme/Division of Technology Industry and Economics, ParisGoogle Scholar
  80. UNITAR (2008) Understanding Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals  (GHS): a companion guide to the purple book. United Nations Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR), GenevaGoogle Scholar
  81. Urbina I (2010a) Conflict of interest worries raised in spill tests. The New York Times (NYT), 20 May 2010Google Scholar
  82. Urbina (2010b) Inspector General’s inquiry faults regulators. The New York Times (NYT), 24 May 2010Google Scholar
  83. Uredba o sprječavanju velikih nesreća koje uključuju opasne stvari (2008) (Eng. Regulation on control of major industrial accident hazards). Službeni list Republike Hrvatske, br. 114/2008Google Scholar
  84. USCSB (1999–2010) Final Investigation Reports, U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board. CSB Investigations. Resource document. Accessed 28 May 2010
  85. WHO (2009) Manual for the public health management of chemical incidents (Inter- Organisation Programme for the Sound Management of Chemicals – IOMC). World Health Organization (WHO), GenevaGoogle Scholar
  86. Wortley W, Mazerolle L (2008) Environmental criminology and crime analysis. Willan Publishing, Cullompton, DevonGoogle Scholar
  87. Zakon o kemikalijama (2005) (Eng. Chemicals Act). Službeni list Republike Hrvatske, br. 150/2005, 53/2008Google Scholar
  88. Zakon o prijevozu opasnih tvari (2007) (Eng. Transport of Dangerous Goods Act). Službeni list Republike Hrvatske, br. 79/2007Google Scholar
  89. Zakon o prostornom uređenju i gradnji (2007) (Eng. Physical Planning and Construction Act) (2007). Službeni list Republike Hrvatske, br. 76/2007Google Scholar
  90. Zakon o zaštiti i spašavanju (2004) (Eng. Disaster Protection and Rescue Act). Službeni list Republike Hrvatske, br. 174/2004, 79/2007Google Scholar
  91. Zakon o zaštiti od požara (2010) (Eng. Fire Protection Act). Službeni list Republike Hrvatske, br. 92/2010Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ministry of the Interior, General Police DirectoratePolice Academy, Police CollegeZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations