Abstract
Insurance is a prominent, well-established mechanism for risk transfer in developed countries. While North American governments have stalled on both mitigation of and adaptation to climate change, the insurance industry (globally and in North America) is already viewing recent catastrophic events as being partially climate change related and exploring new adaptation initiatives. In general, the intent of these initiatives is to assure the prosperity of the insurance sector, not to prevent damage to life and property. Reliance by insurers on predictive risk modeling continues to be limited, as new initiatives are prompted by extreme events rather than modeled projections of damage. As another example of reactive behavior, insurers rely on legal judgments to determine the extent of their liabilities. This pattern of learning and response has two implications. First, opportunities for anticipatory adaptation prompted by insurer initiatives are very limited, which guarantees continued large losses from extreme events into the future. Second, proactive risk mitigation will have to be pursued and implemented on behalf of public welfare by the relevant branches of government and cannot be left to market forces.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
42 U.S.C., Chap. 85.
References
Abraham KS (2002) The insurance effects of regulation by litigation. In: Viscusi WK (ed) Regulation through litigation. Donnelley, Harrisonburg
Adams M (2006) Strapped insurers flee coastal areas. USA Today (26 April 2006)
Carlson JA (2005) The economics of fire protection: from the great fire of London to rural/metro. Econ Aff 25(3):39–44
Casman EA, Dowlatabadi H (2002) The contextual determinants of malaria. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC
Catovsky S (2005) Financial risks of climate change. Association of British Insurers, London
Center on Race Poverty & the Environment, Native American Rights Fund (2008) Kivalina complaint. San Francisco. http://www.climatelaw.org/cases/country/us/kivalina/kivalina. Cited 22 Sep 2008
Changnon SA, Pielke RA, Changnon D et al (2000) Human factors explain the increased losses from weather and climate extremes. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 81(3):437–442
Cline WR (1992) The economics of global warming. Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC
Cornell C (1968) Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 58(5):1583–1606
Cummins JD (2002) Comment: the insurance effects of regulation by litigation. In: Viscusi WK (ed) Regulation through litigation. Donnelley, Harrisonburg
Federal Emergency Management Agency (2002) National flood insurance program description. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington DC. http://www.fema.gov/library/viewRecord.do?id=1480. Cited 8 Sep 2008
Florida Disaster (2008) Florida Division of Emergency Management. Hurricane loss mitigation program. Tallahassee. http://www.floridadisaster.org/brm/fhlmp_section1.htm. Cited 8 Sept 2008
Grossman DA (2003) Warming up to a not-so-radical idea: tort-based climate change litigation. Columbia J Environ Law 28(1):1–61
Guatteri M, Bertogg M, Castaldi A (2005) A shake in insurance history: the 1906 San Francisco earthquake. Swiss Reinsurance Company Economic Research & Consulting, Zurich. http://www.swissre.com/pws/media%20centre/news/news%20releases%202006/swiss%20re%20publication%20recounts%20one%20of%20the%20most%20significant%20events%20in%20insurance%20history%20%20the%201906%20san%20francisco%20earthquake%20and%20fire.html. Cited 8 Sept 2008
Healy JK, Tapick JM (2004) Climate change: it’s not just a policy issue for corporate counsel – it’s a legal problem. Columbia J Environ Law 29(1):89–118
Hsu S-L (2008) A realistic evaluation of climate change litigation through the lens of a hypothetical lawsuit. Social Science Research Network. http://ssrn.com/paper=1014870. Cited 22 Sept 2008
Insurance Information Institute (2008) Insurance Information Institute paper analyzes growth of state-run property insurance plans: number of policyholders doubled between 1997 and 2006; stabilized in 2007–2008. http://www.iii.org/media/updates/press.788572/. Cited 19 Aug 2008
Jeffee DM, Russell T (1997) Catastrophe insurance, capital markets, and uninsurable risks. J Risk Ins 64(2):205–230
Kunreuther H (1996) Mitigating disaster losses through insurance. J Risk Uncertain 12(2):171–187
Lott N, Ross T (2006) Tracking and evaluating U.S. billion dollar weather disasters 1980–2005. NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center, Ashville
Mills E (2005) Insurance in a climate of change. Science 309(5737):1040–1044
Mills E, Roth RJ Jr, Lecomte E (2005) Availability and affordability of insurance under climate change: a growing challenge for the U.S. CERES, Boston
Native American Rights Fund [NARF] (2008) NARF & Alaskan native village sues 24 oil and energy companies for destruction caused by global warming. Kivalina, AK. http://narfnews.blogspot.com/2008/02/narf-alaskan-native-village-sues-24-oil.html. Cited 22 Sept 2008
Pielke RA (2007) Future economic damage from tropical cyclones: sensitivities to societal and climate changes. Philos Trans R Soc A 365(1860):1–13
Pielke R, Sarewitz D (2002) Wanted: scientific leadership on climate. Issues Sci Technol 19:27–30
Pielke RA, Agrawala S, Bouwer LM et al (2005) Clarifying the attribution of recent disaster losses: a response to Epstein and McCarthy. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 86:1481–1483
Priest GL (2003) Government insurance versus market insurance. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 28:71–80
Reiter P, Lathrop S, Bunning M et al (2003) Texas lifestyle limits transmission of dengue virus. Emerg Infect Dis 9(1):86–89
Stern N (2006) The economics of climate change: the Stern review. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York
Wharton Risk Center (2007) Managing large-scale risks in a new era of catastrophes: the role of the private and public sectors in insuring, mitigating and financing recovery from natural disasters in the United States. In: Doherty N, Grace M, Hartwig R et al (eds) The Wharton Risk Center extreme events project, in conjunction with Georgia State University and the Insurance Information Institute, Philadelphia
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful for the helpful comments of two anonymous reviewers. Thank you to Jean-Nöel Guye, Daniel Hoffman, Howard Kunreuther, Lester B Lave, Erwan Michel-Kerjan for many helpful suggestions. And thank you to Iris Grossmann for her insightful review.
This research was made possible through support from the Climate Decision Making Center (CDMC) Department of Engineering and Public Policy at Carnegie Mellon University. This Center has been created through a cooperative agreement between the National Science Foundation (SES-0345798) and Carnegie Mellon University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cook, C.L., Dowlatabadi, H. (2011). Learning Adaptation: Climate-Related Risk Management in the Insurance Industry. In: Ford, J., Berrang-Ford, L. (eds) Climate Change Adaptation in Developed Nations. Advances in Global Change Research, vol 42. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0567-8_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0567-8_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0566-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0567-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)