Advertisement

Becoming a Teacher: An English Case Study

  • Tony Brown
  • Olwen McNamara
Chapter
Part of the Mathematics Education Library book series (MELI, volume 53)

Abstract

The key objective of this book is to present a theoretically oriented account of the processes through which primary teachers develop their understanding of the task of teaching mathematics. The theoretical framework was created as we faced the task of building a picture of the training process in England, where the regulative apparatus of the central government impacts greatly on teacher practices and on conceptions of mathematics. At one level these are colloquial concerns. Nevertheless, we are seeking to address an international audience as we feel that certain issues might activate a broader interest. Key among these is the formation of primary teacher

Keywords

Mathematics Teaching Mathematics Teacher Student Teacher Prospective Teacher Teacher Training 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Althusser, L. (1971). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. In Lenin and philosophy and other essays. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
  2. Banks, B. (1971). The disaster kit. Mathematical Gazette, 391, 17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrett, E., Whitty, G., Furlong, J., Galvin, C., & Barton, L. (1992). Initial teacher education in England and Wales: A topography. London: Goldsmith’s College.Google Scholar
  4. Benton, P. (Ed.). (1990). The Oxford Internship Scheme: Integration and partnership in initial teacher education. London: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.Google Scholar
  5. Bines, H. (1994). Squaring the circle? Government reform of initial teacher training for primary education. Journal of Educational Policy, 9(4), 369–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bratman, M. (1992). Shared cooperative activity. Philosophical Review, 2(101), 327–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brisard, E., Menter, I., & Smith, I. (2005). Models of partnership in programmes of initial teacher training: A systematic review. Edinburgh: General Teaching Council of Scotland.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, M. (1999). Swings of the pendulum. In I. Thompson (Ed.), Issues in teaching numeracy in primary schools (pp. 3–16). Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, M., Askew, M., Baker, D., Denvir, H., & Millett, A. (1998). Is the National Numeracy Strategy research–based? British Journal of Educational Studies, 46(4), 362–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, S., McNally, J., & Stronach, I. (1993). Getting it together: Questions and answers about partnership and mentoring. Stirling: Department of Education, University of Stirling.Google Scholar
  11. Brown, T., McNamara, O., Hanley, U., & Jones, L. (1999). Primary student teachers’ understanding of mathematics and its teaching. British Education Research Journal, 25(3), 299–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Campbell, J., & Husbands, C. (2000). On the reliability of OFSTED inspection of initial teacher training: A case study. British Journal of Educational Research, 26(1), 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carré, C., & Ernest, P. (1993). Performance in subject-matter knowledge in mathematics. In N. Bennett & C. Carré (Eds.), Learning to teach (pp. 36–50). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Carter, D., Carré, C., & Bennett, N. (1993). Student teachers’ changing perceptions of their subject matter competence during an initial teacher training programme. Educational Researcher, 35(1), 89–95.Google Scholar
  15. Convery, A. (1999). Listening to teacher’ stories: Are we sitting too comfortably? International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 12(2), 131–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Corbin, B., McNamara, O., & Williams, J. (2003). Numeracy co-ordinators: Brokering change within and between communities. British Journal of Educational Studies, 51(4), 344–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Crozier, G., Menter, I., & Pollard, A. (1990). Changing partnership. In M. Booth, J. Furlong, & M. Wilkin (Eds.), Partnership in initial teacher education (pp. 44–56). London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  18. Dart, L., & Drake, P. (1993). School-based teacher training: A conservative practice? Journal of Education for Teaching, 19(2), 175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dunne, M., Lock, R., & Soares, A. (1996). Partnership in initial teacher training: After the shotgun wedding. Educational Review, 48(1), 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Earl, L., Watson, N., Levin, B., Leithwood, K., Fullan, M., & Torrance, N. (2003). Watching and learning 3, final report of the external evaluation of England’s National Literacy and Numeracy Strategies. Toronto, ON: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  21. Edwards, A. (1995). Teacher education: Partnership in pedagogy? Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(6), 595–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Furlong, J. (2001). Reforming teacher education, reforming teachers: Accountability, professionalism and competence. In R. Phillips & J. Furlong (Eds.), Education, reform and the state: 25 years of policy, politics and practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Furlong, J. (2005). New Labour and teacher education: The end of an era. Oxford Education Review, 33(1), 119–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Furlong, J., Barton, L., Whiting, C., & Whitty, G. (2000). Teacher education in transition: Re-forming professionalism? Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Furlong, J., Campbell, A., Howson, J., Lewis, S., & McNamara, O. (2006). Partnership in English teacher education: Changing times, changing definitions – evidence from the Teacher Training Agency National Partnership Project. Scottish Education Review, 37, 32–45.Google Scholar
  26. Galton, M. (1995). Crisis in the primary classroom. London: David Fulton.Google Scholar
  27. Gilroy, P., & Wilcox, B. (1997). OFSTED, criteria and the nature of social understanding: A Wittgenstienian critique of the practice of educational judgement. British Journal of Educational Studies, 45, 22–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Graham, J., & Nabb, J. (1999). Stakeholder satisfaction: survey of OFSTED inspection of ITT 1994–1999, UCET Research Paper no. 1. London: Universities Council for the Education of Teachers.Google Scholar
  29. Green, S., & Ollerton, M. (1999). Mathematical anxiety amongst primary QTS students. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, (June) Lancaster.Google Scholar
  30. Harris, S., Keys, W., & Fernandes, C. (1997). Third international mathematics and science study: Second national report. Part 1. Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  31. Hextall, I., Mahony, P., & Menter, I. (2001). Just testing? An analysis of the implementation of ‘skills tests’ for entry into the teaching profession in England. Journal of Education for Teaching, 27(3), 221–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Holyoake, J. (1993). Initial teacher training - the French view. Journal of Education for Teaching, 19(2), 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. House of Commons. (1999). The work of Ofsted: other inspection frameworks. Select Committee on Education and Employment, report from the Education sub-committee: June 1999. Accessed 20.09.2007, from http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199899/cmselect/cmeduemp/62/6213.htm
  34. Lawson, M. (2010). TV debate: Leaders’ reputations left intact, guardian.co.uk, Thursday 15 April.Google Scholar
  35. Lunn, P., & Bishop, A. (2003). ‘”To Touch a Life Forever”: A discourse on trainee teachers’ perceptions of what it means to be an effective teacher in the primary school’. Educational Studies, 29(2/3), 195–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. MacAloon, J. (1984). Olympic games and the theory of cultural performance. In J. MacAloon (Ed.), Rite, drama, festival, spectacle. Rehearsals towards a theory of cultural performance. Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.Google Scholar
  37. MacLure, M. (1993). Arguing for yourself: Identity as an organising principle in teachers’ jobs and lives. British Educational Research Journal, 19, 311–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mahony, P., & Hextall, I. (2000). Reconstructing teaching. London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  39. Mansell, W., & Ward, H. (2003, May 9). A £400m failure. Times Education Supplement, 11.Google Scholar
  40. McNair, A. (1944). Teachers and Youth Leaders (The McNair Report). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  41. McNally, J., Cope, P., Inglis, B., & Stronach, I. (1994). Current realities in the student teaching experience: A preliminary enquiry. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10(2), 219–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McNamara, O. (2008). Initial teacher education: A(nother) decade of radical reform. In H. Gunter & C. Chapman (Eds.), Radical reforms: Perspectives on an era of educational change (pp. 91–103). London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  43. McNamara, O., Brundrett, M., & Webb, R. (2008). Primary teachers: Initial teacher education, continuing professional development and school leadership development. Primary Review Research Survey 6/3. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Faculty of Education.Google Scholar
  44. McNamara, O., & Corbin, B. (2001). Warranting practices: Teachers embedding the National Numeracy Strategy. British Journal of Educational Studies, 49(3), 260–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McNamara, O., Roberts, L., Basit, T. N., & Brown, T. (2002). Rites of passage in initial teacher training: Ritual, performance, ordeal and numeracy skills tests. British Educational Research Journal, 28(6), 861–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Morgan, C. (1997). Generic expectations and teacher assessment. Paper presented to the group on the Research into Social Perspectives of Mathematics Education. London: Institute of Education.Google Scholar
  47. Morris, E. (1999). In teacher training agency, national skills tests: A guide for trainee teachers. London: Teacher Training Agency.Google Scholar
  48. Noss, R. (1997). New cultures, new numeracies. London: Institute of Education.Google Scholar
  49. Power, M. (1994). The audit explosion. London: DEMOS.Google Scholar
  50. Reynolds, D. (1998). ‘Schooling for literacy: A review of research on teacher effectiveness and school effectiveness and its implications for contemporary educational policies’. Educational Review, 50(2), 147–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Reynolds, D., & Farrell, S. (1996). Worlds apart: A review of international surveys of educational achievement involving England. London: Ofsted.Google Scholar
  52. Rose, J. (2006). Independent review of the teaching of early reading. London: Department for Education and Skills.Google Scholar
  53. Rose, J. (2009). Independent review of the primary curriculum. London: Department for Children, Schools and Families.Google Scholar
  54. Schütz, A. (1962). The problem of social reality. The Hague: Martinus Nijhof.Google Scholar
  55. Simco, N., & Wilson, T. (2002). Primary initial teacher training and education: Revised standards, bright future? Exeter: Learning Matters.Google Scholar
  56. Singer, M. (1959). Traditional India: Structure and change. Philadelphia: American Folk Law Society.Google Scholar
  57. Sinkinson, A., & Jones, K. (2001). The validity and reliability of Ofsted judgements of the quality of secondary mathematics initial teacher education courses. Cambridge Journal of Education, 31(2), 221–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Smith, K., & Hodson, E. (2010). Theorising practice in initial teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 36(3), 259–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stronach, I. (1999). Shouting theatre in a crowded fire: Educational effectiveness as ‘cultural performance’. Evaluation, 5(2), 173–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Taylor, W. (2000). The role of the providers. In I. Reid (Ed.), Improving schools: The contribution of teacher education and training: an account of the joint UCET/HMI Symposium, Edinburgh, December. (UCET, Occasional Paper).Google Scholar
  61. Williams, A., & Soares, A. (2002). Sharing roles and responsibilities in initial teacher training: perceptions of some key players. Cambridge Journal of Education, 32(1), 91–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Department for Education and Employment. (1998a). Teachers: Meeting the challenge of change. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office.Google Scholar
  63. Department for Education and Employment. (1999a). Framework for numeracy. London: Department for Employment, Standards and Effectiveness Unit.Google Scholar
  64. Department for Education and Skills. (2004). Excellence and enjoyment: Learning and teaching in the primary years. London: DfES.Google Scholar
  65. Department for Education and Skills. (2006). Primary framework for literacy and mathematics. London: DCSF.Google Scholar
  66. Felman, S. (1987). Jacques Lacan and the adventure of insight: Psychoanalysis in contemporary culture. Cambridge, MA: University of Harvard Press.Google Scholar
  67. Lacey, C. (1977). The socialisation of teachers. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  68. Noss, R. (1998). New numeracies for a technological culture. For the Learning of Mathematics, 18(2), 2–12.Google Scholar
  69. Ofsted. (2002). Framework for the inspection of initial teacher education 2002–2005, HMI 548. London: Ofsted.Google Scholar
  70. Ofsted. (2007a). Annual report of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Schools 2006–2007. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  71. Ofsted. (2007b). An employment–based route into teaching 2003–06, HMI 2664. London: Ofsted.Google Scholar
  72. Ricoeur, P. (1984). Time and narrative (vol. 1). Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Teacher Training Agency. (1999). National Skills tests: A guide for trainee teachers. London: Teacher Training Agency.Google Scholar
  74. Teacher Training Agency. (2002). Qualifying to teach: Professional standards for qualified teacher status and requirements for initial teacher training. London: Teacher Training Agency.Google Scholar
  75. Teacher Training Agency. (2000a). QTS numeracy skills test trainee support materials. London: Teacher Training Agency.Google Scholar
  76. Teacher Training Agency. (2000b). QTS skills test in numeracy, June and July 2000: National results summary for initial training providers. London: Teacher Training Agency.Google Scholar
  77. Universities’ Council for the Education of Teachers. (2007). ITE Inspection Burdens. London: UCET.Google Scholar
  78. Basit, T. (2003a). Changing practice through policy: Trainee teachers and the National Numeracy Strategy. Research Papers in Education, 18, 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Manchester Metropolitan University, Institute of EducationManchesterUK
  2. 2.University of Manchester, School of EducationManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations