Advertisement

The Importance of Affective Containment for Teacher Effectiveness and Successful Educational Change

  • Chris James
Chapter
Part of the Professional Learning and Development in Schools and Higher Education book series (PROD, volume 100)

Abstract

For teachers, lecturers and those with leadership and management responsibility in schools and colleges, controlling the experience of feelings—especially difficult feelings—and the feelings experienced by others can be extremely hard. Furthermore, attempts by individuals and organisations to protect themselves against unwelcome feelings by engaging in defensive behaviours may not be helpful. Such efforts can create distance, defensiveness and “affective anorexia”, where the affective experience of teaching and managing is minimised, and can reduce both individual and collective effectiveness and change capability. Another and arguably more productive way of working with feelings is affective containment where feelings can be “held” individually and collectively (placed and secured in a “container” in a metaphorical sense), reflected upon, learned from and used to good effect. This transformation process, which is known as affective containment, can enhance individual and collective effectiveness and capacity to change. The intention of this chapter is to develop the notion of affective containment and to consider its potential role in securing and augmenting teacher effectiveness and helping to bring about successful educational change.

Keywords

Primary Task Organisation Member Work Organisation Defensive Behaviour Social Defence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bion, W. R. (1961). Experiences in groups and other papers. London: Tavistock.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown, J. A. C. (1972). Freud and the post-Freudians. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  3. Day, C. (2004). A passion for teaching. London: Falmer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dunning, G., James, C. R., & Jones, N. (2005). Splitting and projection at work in schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 43, 244–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fineman, S. (2003). Understanding emotion at work. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Fonagy, P. (2001). Attachment theory and psychoanalysis. London: Other Press.Google Scholar
  7. Forgas, J. P. (2000). Introduction: The role of affect in social cognition. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Thinking and feeling: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 1–30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Gabriel, Y. (1999). Organizations in depth. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
  10. Halton, W. (1994). Some unconscious aspects of organisational life. In A. Obholzer & V. Z. Roberts (Eds.), The unconscious at work (pp. 11–18). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Hirshhorn, L. (1988). The workplace within: Psychodynamics of organisational life. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialisation of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  13. James, C. R. (1999). Institutional transformation and educational management. In T. Bush, L. Bell, R. Bolam, R. Glatter, & P. Ribbins (Eds.), Educational management: Redefining theory, policy and practice (pp. 142–154). London: Chapman/Sage.Google Scholar
  14. James, C. R. (2004). The work of educational leaders in building creative and passionate schools and colleges. In H. Tomlinson (Ed.), Educational management: Major themes in education. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  15. James, C. R. (2007). Collaborative practice: The basis of good educational work. Management in Education, 21(4), 32–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. James, C. R. (2008). Teaching as affective practice. In H. Daniels, J. Porter, & H. Lauder (Eds.), Companion in education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. James, C. R. (2010). The psychodynamics of educational change. In A. Hargreaves & D. Hopkins (Eds.), The international handbook of educational change. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. James, C. R., & Connolly, U. (2000). Effective change in schools. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. James, C. R., Connolly, M., Dunning, G., & Elliott, T. (2006). How very effective primary schools work. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. James, C. R., Connolly, M., Dunning, G., & Elliott, T. (2007). Collaborative practice: A model of successful working in schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 45(5), 541–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lawrence, W. G. (1977). Management development…some ideals: Images and realities. Journal of European Industrial Training, 1(1), 21–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Menzies, I. E. P. (1960). A case study in functioning of social systems as a defence against anxiety. Human Relations, 13, 95–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Menzies Lyth, I. (1988). Containing anxiety in institutions. Selected essays (Vol. 1). London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
  24. Miller, E., & Rice, A. K. (1967). Systems of organisation. In A. D. Coleman & W. H. Bexton (Eds.), Group relations reader 1 (pp. 43–68). Jupiter: Rice Institute.Google Scholar
  25. Niedenthal, P. M., Krauth-Gruber, S., & Ric, F. (2006). Psychology of emotion: Interpersonal, experiential and cognitive approaches. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  26. Oatley, K., & Jenkins, J. M. (1996). Understanding emotions. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  27. Obholzer, A. (1994). Afterword. In A. Obholzer & V. Z. Roberts (Eds.), The unconscious at work (pp. 11–18). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schein, E. H. (1992). Organisational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  29. Segal, H. (1979). Klein. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
  30. Winnicot, D. W. (1958). Through paediatrics to psychoanalysis. London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
  31. Winnicot, D. W. (1965). The maturational process and the facilitating environment. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EducationUniversity of BathBathUK

Personalised recommendations