Preparing School Leaders to Lead Organizational Learning and Capacity Building
This chapter examines the leadership development of principals /head teachers in England , Sweden and the United States with a particular focus on organizational learning and capacity building in leadership preparation programs. The authors note that leadership preparation varies across the three countries, with the longest history of formal training in the United States. At the same time, several similarities and trends in organizational learning preparation and professional development exist. Further, this chapter considers how these various elements of leadership preparation could be employed to better prepare aspiring and current principals to successfully lead organizational learning and capacity building in their schools. The chapter concludes with three recommendations regarding (1) candidate selection, (2) curricula design and (3) professional and social support that could enhance school leadership preparation and subsequent on-the-job performance.
KeywordsOrganizational Learning School Leader Preparation Program Head Teacher Instructional Leadership
- Copland, M. (2001). The myth of the superprincipal. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(7), 528–533.Google Scholar
- Darling-Hammond, L., LaPointe, M., Meyerson, D., Orr. M., & Cohen, C. (2007). Preparing school leaders for a changing world: Lessons from exemplary leadership development programs. Palo Alto: Stanford Educational Leadership Institute.Google Scholar
- D. E. S. (1987). Circular No. 9/87: Local Education Authority Training Grants Scheme: Financial Year 1988/89. London. Department of Education and Skills.Google Scholar
- Doolittle, V., Jacobson, S., LeTendre, B., & McCarthy, M. (2003). Tracking leadership preparation to practice and back. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, April, Chicago.Google Scholar
- Leithwood, K., & Riehl, C. (2003). What do we already know about successful school leadership? Paper prepared for the AERA Division A Task Force on Developing Research in Educational Leadership.Google Scholar
- Louis, K., & Kruse, S. (1995). Professionalism and community: Perspectives on reforming urban schools. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.Google Scholar
- Mitchell, C., & Sackney, L. (2000). Profound improvement: Building capacity for a learning community. Downington: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
- Mulford, B. (2003). School leaders: Changing roles and impact on teacher and school effectiveness. Paper commissioned by the Education and Training Policy Division, OECD, for the activity Attracting, Developing and Retaining Effective Teachers.Google Scholar
- NCSL. (2009). www.ncsl.org.uk. Accessed 18 September 2009.
- OECD. (2008). Improving school leadership: Policy and practice. Paris: OECDGoogle Scholar
- Olson, L. (2000, January 12) Quality Counts Report examines teacher quality. Education Week. http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2000/01/12/17qc.h19.html.
- Poster, C. (1988). 3/83 And all that. In C. Poster & C. Day (Eds.), Partnership in education management. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- SIA. (1974). Skolans arbetsmiljö. Betänkande. Av utredningen om skolans inre arbete SIA, SOU 1974:53.Google Scholar
- Skolverket. (1993). Head teachers for Tomorrow. Stockholm: The Swedish National Agency for Education.Google Scholar
- Skolverket. (2002). School head—Democratic, challenging leader. Stockholm: The Swedish National Agency for Education.Google Scholar
- Skolverket. (2009). Goals of the National School Leadership Training Programme. Stockholm: The Swedish National Agency for Education.Google Scholar
- Supovitz, J. (2000). Manage less: Lead more. Principal Leadership, 1(3), 14–19.Google Scholar
- University Council for Educational Administration. (2008). Innovative university programs: Leadership Initiative for Tomorrow’s Schools (LIFTS)—University at Buffalo. UCEA Review, XLIX(2), 17–19.Google Scholar
- Williams, T. (2001). The unseen exodus: Meeting the challenges of replacing Ontario’s principals and vice-principals. O.P.C. Register, 3(3), 10–14.Google Scholar