Advertisement

Comparative Perspectives: An Overview of Seven Educational Contexts

  • Stephen L. JacobsonEmail author
  • Rose M. Ylimaki
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Educational Leadership book series (SIEL, volume 12)

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to provide an overview of the book and its intended purposes. We first describe the International Successful School Principalship Project (ISSPP), its underlying theoretical framework, the research methodologies employed, the project’s limitations, and how analyses of the project’s data and findings evolved from the first phase of the study to its current focus. Next we describe briefly the educational contexts of the seven nations from which the cases for this book were drawn—Australia , Cyprus , Denmark , England , Norway , Sweden, and the United States, focusing specifically on key economic, social, and cultural factors, such as demographic diversity, that distinguish one setting from another. Finally, we explain why leadership for organizational learning and capacity building , instructional leadership, and culturally responsive leadership practices were selected for analysis in this book. We conclude by discussing the implications of these three issues for improving the preparation of future school leaders.

Keywords

Organizational Learning National Curriculum School Leader Successful School American Educational Research Association 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Apple, M. (1992). The text and cultural politics. Educational Researcher, 21(7), 4–19.Google Scholar
  2. Crow, G. (2007). The complex landscape of successful principal practices: An international perspective. International Studies in Educational Administration, 35(3), 67–74.Google Scholar
  3. Day, C. (2007). Successful principalship: International perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Day, C., Harris, A., Hadfield, M., Tolley, H., & Beresford, J. (2000). Leading schools in times of change. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Department of Education and Training. (2003). Blueprint for government schools. Melbourne: DEandT.Google Scholar
  6. Elstad, E. (2008). Ansvarliggjøringsmekanismer: Når skoleeier eller pressen stiller skoler til ansvar. In G. Langfeldt, E. Elstad, & S. Hopmann (Eds.), Ansvarlighet i skolen. Politiske spørsmål og pedagogiske svar (pp. 204–234). Fagernes: Cappelen Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
  7. Frankenburg, E., Lee, C., & Orfield, G. (2003). A multiracial society with segregated schools: Are we losing the dream? The Civil Right Project. www.civilrightsproject.harvard.edu/research/reseg03/resegregation03.php.
  8. Giles, C. (2007). Building capacity in challenging US schools: An exploration of transformational leadership practice in relation to organizational learning. International Studies in Educational Administration, 35(3), 30–38.Google Scholar
  9. Gurr, D. (2007). Development of school accountability systems in Australia. In L. Smith & D. Riley (Eds.), Blooming Leadership (pp. 51–71). Sydney: ACEL.Google Scholar
  10. Gurr, D., Drysdale, L., Di Natale, E., Ford, P., Hardy, R., & Swann, R. (2003). Successful school leadership in Victoria: Three case studies. Leading and Managing, 9(1), 18–37.Google Scholar
  11. Hallinger, P. (2004). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 329–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Helgøy, I., & Homme, A. (2006). Policy tools and institutional change. Comparing education policies in Norway, Sweden and England. Journal of Public Policy, 26(2), 141–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jacobson, S. (2007). Leadership for success in high poverty elementary schools. Journal of Educational Leadership, Policy and Practice, 23(1), 3–19.Google Scholar
  14. Jacobson, S., Johnson, L., Giles, C., & Ylimaki, R. (2005). Successful leadership in U.S. schools: Enabling principles, enabling schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(6), 607–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnson, L. (2007). Rethinking successful school leadership in challenging U.S. schools: Culturally responsive practices in school-community relationships. International Studies in Educational Administration, 35(3), 49–58.Google Scholar
  16. Kilpatrick, S., Johns, S., Mulford, B., Falk, I., & Prescott, L. (2002). More than education: Leadership for rural school-community partnerships. Canberra: RIRDC Press. http://www.rirdc.gov.au/reports/HCC/02–055sum.html.
  17. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995a). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491.Google Scholar
  18. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995b). But that’s just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory Into Practice, 34(3), 159–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Leithwood, K. (2005). Understanding successful principal leadership: Progress on a broken front. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(6), 619–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Leithwood, K., & Day, C. (2007). Successful principal leadership in times of change: An international perspective. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Leithwood, K., & Riehl, C. (2005). What we know about successful school leadership. In W. Firestone & C. Riehl (Eds.), A new agenda: Directions for research on educational leadership. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  22. Marks, H., & Printy, S. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformation and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 4(3), 293–331.Google Scholar
  23. Ministry of Education and Culture. (2007). Strategic planning for schooling. [In Greek.] http://www.moec.gov.cy. Accessed 21 Dec 2007.
  24. Møller, J. (2009). School leadership in an age of accountability: Tensions between managerial and professional accountability. Journal of Educational Change, 10(2), 165–177.Google Scholar
  25. Moos, L. (2008). School leadership for ‘Democratic Bildung’: Fundamentalist beliefs or critical reflection? School Leadership and Management, 28(3), 229–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moos, L. (2009). Hard and soft governance: The journey from transnational agencies to school leadership. European Educational Research Journal, 8(3), 397–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mulford, W., Silins, H., & Leithwood, K. (2004). Educational leadership for organisational learning and improved student outcomes. Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  28. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2002). The condition of education 2002. Washington: U.S. Government Office.Google Scholar
  29. Sivesind, K. (2008). Reformulating reform. Curriculum history revisited. Dissertation for the Degree of Dr. Philos, Faculty of Education, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
  30. Skedsmo, G. (2009). School governing in transition? Perspectives, purposes and perceptions of evaluation policy. Dissertation for the degree of PhD, Faculty of Education, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
  31. Spring, J. (2004). American education (11th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  32. SSB. (2006). Samfunnsspeilet nr. 4. Oslo: Statistics Norway.Google Scholar
  33. Vedoy, G., & Moller, J. (2007). Successful school leadership for diversity? Examining two contrasting examples of working for democracy in Norway. International Studies in Educational Administration, 35(3), 59–71.Google Scholar
  34. Villegas, A., & Lucas, T. (2002). Educating culturally responsive teachers: A coherent approach. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  35. Ylimaki, R. M. (2007). Instructional leadership in challenging US schools. International Studies in Educational Administration, 35(3), 11–19.Google Scholar
  36. Ylimaki, R. M., & Jacobson, S. (2007, December). Successful school leadership: International perspectives. International Studies of Educational Administration (Special Issue).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University at BuffaloState University of New YorkBuffaloUSA
  2. 2.University of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations