Design Heuristics: Cognitive Strategies for Creativity in Idea Generation

  • Seda Yilmaz
  • Colleen M. Seifert
  • Richard Gonzalez

Abstract

This paper explores the use of heuristics as cognitive strategies invoked during the process of design. We propose new heuristics for design that provide ways to explore the problem space of potential designs, and often lead to the generation of creative solutions. We test whether Design Heuristics can be taught to novices, and whether doing so will improve the creativity of their resulting designs.

In the present empirical study, we evaluate a set of six instructional heuristics, and validate their effectiveness with product concepts generated by novice designers. Six hundred and seventy three drawings were created by 120 first-year college students under four instructional conditions. Drawings were coded according to the use of heuristics, and scored for creativity. The results showed that the most creative concepts emerged from the experimental conditions where heuristics were introduced. Heuristics appeared to help the participants “jump” into a new problem space, resulting in more varied designs, and a greater number of designs judged as more creative.

Our findings suggest that the simple demonstration of design heuristics may, at times, be sufficient to stimulate variation and creativity in design.

Keywords

Design Task Cognitive Strategy Serial Order Divergent Thinking Product Concept 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Adams, R.S., Atman, C.J.: Cognitive processes in iterative design behavior. In: Proc. 29th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Juan, Puerto Rico, pp. 11a6-13–11a6-18 (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amabile, T.M.: Creativity in Context. Westview Press, Boulder, Co. (1996)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Altshuller, G.: Creativity as an exact science. Gordon and Breach, New York (1984)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Benami, O., Jin, Y.: Cognitive stimulation in conceptual design. In: Proc. ASME 2002 Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computer and Information in Engineering Conference, DETC2002/DTM-34023, Montreal, Canada, pp. 1–13 (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Christensen, B.T., Schunn, C.D.: Putting blinkers on a blind man: Providing cognitive support for creative processes with environmental cues. In: Wood, K., Markman, A. (eds.) Tools for Innovation, pp. 48–74 (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Christiaans, H.H.C.M., Dorst, K.H.: Cognitive models in industrial design engineering: A protocol study. In: Proc. Fourth International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, ASME, pp. 131–140 (1992)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Clapham, M.M.: Ideation skills training: A key element in creativity training programs. Creativity Research J. 10(1), 33–44 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cross, N.: Engineering design methods: strategies for product design, 3rd edn., Chichester. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, UK (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cross, N.: Expertise in design: An overview. Design Studies 25(5), 427–441 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M., Getzels, J.W.: Discovery-oriented behavior and the originality of artistic products: A study with artists. J. of Personality and Social Psychology 19(1), 47–52 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dorst, K., Cross, N.: Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problem–solution. Design Studies 22(5), 425–437 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eberle, B.: Scamper. Prufrock, Waco, Texas (1995)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Finke, R.A., Ward, T.B., Smith, S.M.: Creative cognition: theory, research, and applications. MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    French, M.J.: Conceptual Design for Engineers. The Design Council/Springer, London, UK (1985)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gordon, W.J.J.: Synectics. Harper & Row, New York (1961)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Harrington, D.M.: Effects of explicit instructions to “be creative” on the psychological meaning of divergent thinking test scores. J. of Personality 43(3), 434–454 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kruger, C., Cross, N.: Solution driven versus problem driven design: Strategies and outcomes. Design Studies 27(5), 527–548 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Newell, A., Simon, H.A.: Human Problem Solving. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1972)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nisbett, R.E., Ross, L.: Human Inference: Strategies, and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs (1980)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pahl, G., Beitz, W.: Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach, 2nd edn. Springer, London (1996)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Park, J.A., Yilmaz, S., Kim, Y.S.: Using visual reasoning model in the analysis of sketching process. In: Workshop Proc. Third International Conference on Design Computing and Cognition (DCC 2008), pp. 15–22 (2008)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schon, D.A.: Designing: Rules, types and worlds. Design Studies 9(3), 181–190 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yilmaz, S., Seifert, C.: Cognitive heuristics employed by design experts: A case study. In: Proc. Third International Design Research Conference (IASDR 2009), Seoul, Korea (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Netherlands 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Seda Yilmaz
    • 1
  • Colleen M. Seifert
    • 1
  • Richard Gonzalez
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MichiganUSA

Personalised recommendations