Advertisement

A Comparison of Cognitive Heuristics Use between Engineers and Industrial Designers

  • Seda Yilmaz
  • Shanna R. Daly
  • Colleen M. Seifert
  • Richard Gonzalez

Abstract

The present study focuses on an exploration and identification of design heuristics used in the ideation process in both industrial designers and engineering designers. Design heuristics are cognitive strategies that help the designer generate novel design concepts. These cognitive heuristics may differ based on the design problem, the context defined, and designers’ preferences.

In a think-aloud protocol study, five engineers and five industrial designers were asked to develop product concepts for a novel problem. We analyzed these protocols to document and compare industrial designers’ and engineers’ concept generation approaches, and the use of design heuristics in their proposed solutions. The results show evidence of heuristics use, and that they are effective in generating diverse, creative, and practical concepts. Some differences were observed between the designers from the two domains in their approaches to the design problem and in the design heuristics used in generating alternatives.

Keywords

Design Space Design Task Technical Knowledge Industrial Designer Explore Design Space 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Court, A.W.: Improving creativity in engineering design education. European Journal of Engineering Education 23, 141–154 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Christiaans, H.H.C.M., Dorst, K.H.: Cognitive models in industrial design engineering: a protocol study. In: 4th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, ASME, vol. 42, pp. 131–140 (1992)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Park, J.A., Yilmaz, S., Kim, Y.S.: Using visual reasoning model in the analysis of sketching process. In: Workshop Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Design Computing and Cognition, DCC (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Finke, R.A., Ward, T.B., Smith, S.M.: Creative cognition: theory, research, and applications. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yilmaz, S., Seifert, C.M., Gonzalez, R.: Cognitive heuristics in design: Instructional strategies to increase creativity in idea generation. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Engineering Design and Manufacturing (AI EDAM), Special Issue: Design Pedagogy (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yilmaz, S., Seifert, C.M.: Cognitive heuristics employed by design experts: A case study. In: 4th International Conference of International Association of Society of Design Research, IASDR, Seoul, KoreaGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yilmaz, S., Seifert, C.M.: Cognitive heuristics in design ideation. In: 11th International Design Conference, DESIGN, Dubrovnik, Croatia (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Newell, A., Simon, H.A.: Human problem solving. Prentice-Hall, Englewood (1972)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nisbett, R.E., Ross, L.: Human inference: Strategies, and shortcomings of social judgment. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1980)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Klein, G.: Sources of power: how people make decisions. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Eberle, B.: Scamper, Prufrock,Waco, Texas (1995)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gordon, W.J.J.: Synectics. Harper & Row, New York (1961)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Altshuller, G.: Creativity as an exact science. Gordon and Breach, NY (1984)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Daly, S.R., Yilmaz, S., Seifert, C.M., Gonzalez, R.: Cognitive heuristic use in engineering design ideation. In: Daly, S.R., Yilmaz, S., Seifert, C.M., Gonzalez, R. (eds.) 117th American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. ASEE (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Amabile, T.: Social psychology of creativity: a consequensual asessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 43, 997–1013 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Basadur, M.S., Graen, G.B., Wakabayashi, M.: Identifying differences in creative problem solving style. In: Parnes, S.J. (ed.) Source book for creative problem-solving, Creative Education Foundation Press, Buffalo (1992)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Netherlands 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Seda Yilmaz
    • 1
  • Shanna R. Daly
    • 1
  • Colleen M. Seifert
    • 1
  • Richard Gonzalez
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MichiganUSA

Personalised recommendations