Gender and Doctoral Physics Education: Are We Asking the Right Questions?
Researchers have been exploring the issue of women’s attrition from science doctoral programs for over two decades, but understanding the problem of the under-representation of women in science has remained limited. Thus, the study on which this chapter is based was conceived to examine possible reasons for the under-representation of women in physics, and to understand reasons why women stay in physics. What emerged from this study, however, was the realization that specific questions around why women leave or stay in physics are not sufficient to understand the problem of how to develop gender-inclusive educational practices in doctoral physics. A redefinition of the so-called problem of women in science is necessary: one that de-centres the category woman, and rather focuses on the ways that gender is produced in doctoral physics programs to reify and sustain the current gender order.
KeywordsScience Education Scanning Tunnelling Microscope Doctoral Student Subject Position Doctoral Candidate
- Bucholtz, M., Barnwell, B., Jung-Eun, J. L., & Skapoulli, E. (2009). Techies and fuzzies: The ideological opposition of science and non-science among high-achieving undergraduates. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA. (http://www.linguistics.ucsb.edu/faculty/bucholtz/cv.html).
- Gee, J. P. (2005). An introduction to discourse analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Gonsalves, A. J. (2010). Discourses and gender in doctoral physics: A hard look at a hard science. Unpublished dissertation. McGill University, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
- Hall, S. (1996). Introduction: Who needs ‘identity’? In S. Hall & P. Du Gay (Eds.), Questions of cultural identity (pp. 1–17). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Ivie, R., & Ray, K. N. (2005). Women in physics and astronomy, 2005. AIP Report, Number R-430.02. Statistical Research Center of the American Institute of Physics. E-mail: email@example.com; http://www.aip.org/statistics. Accessed November 17, 2009.
- Keller, E. F. (1985). Reflections on gender and science. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Lemke, J. (1995). Textual politics. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
- Schiebinger, L. (1999). Has feminism changed science? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Summers, L. (2005). Remarks at NBER conference on diversifying the science and engineering workforce. www.President.Harvard.Edu/speeches/2005/nber.html. Accessed January 20, 2006.
- Thomas, K. (1990). Gender and subject in higher education. Bristol: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
- Traweek, S. (1992). Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physicists. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Tsai, L. (2003). Identity reconstruction of women in physics: Interventionist discourse matters. http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED474533. Accessed February 20, 2008.
- Walkerdine, V. (1989). Counting girls out. London: Virago.Google Scholar
- Cetina, K. K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge (1st ed.). Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Eisenhart, M. A., & Finkel, E. (2001). Women (still) need not apply. The gender and science reader. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
- Wood, S. (2005, May 6–8). Doctoral women’s learning and identity in the culture of engineering: Stories as situated retellings. mit4: The work of stories. Conference at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar