Challenging the Taken-For-Granted: How Research Can Inform Doctoral Education Policy and Practice
Policies and practices within institutions are often built on taken-for-granted practices (without the benefit of evidence) or result from external calls for accountability (perhaps accepted without evidence to challenge such calls) that exacerbate the documented tensions and challenges reported by doctoral students and pre-tenure academics. We suggest there is a need for evidence-based perspectives to support the rethinking of certain doctoral policies and practices, and perhaps to challenge external drivers that are placing increasing demands on academics and we have been particularly attentive to this possible use of our research findings. In this chapter, we provide four examples of our efforts to use our research findings in this way. We hope they may stimulate reflection amongst those in academia, including administrators and more senior academics, about how such evidence might influence institutional change towards more research-informed practice and policy, and perhaps lead to challenges of external calls for particular forms of accountability.
KeywordsDoctoral Student Academic Work Informal Learning Academic Position Senior Faculty
- Bazerman, C. (2007). Writing and cognitive development: Beyond writing to learn. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Genre Studies (pp. 38–49). University of Southern Santa Catarina, Tubarão, Santa Catarina, Brazil.Google Scholar
- Billett, S. (2001). Learning through work: Workplace affordances and individual engagement. Journal of Workplace Learning, 5, 290–214.Google Scholar
- Enders, J. (2007). The academic profession. In J. Forest & P. Altbach (Eds.), The international handbook of higher education (pp. 5–22). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Eraut, M. (2007). Early career learning at work and its implications for universities. In N. Entwistle & P. Tomlinson (Eds.), Student learning and university teaching (pp. 113–133). Leicester: British Psychological Society. (Psychological aspects of education—current trends, monograph series, #4).Google Scholar
- Gaff, J. G. (2002). The disconnect between graduate education and faculty realities: A review of recent research. Liberal Education, 88(3), 6–13.Google Scholar
- Golde, C. M., & Dore, T. M. (2001). At cross purposes: What the experiences of doctoral students reveal about doctoral education. Philadelphia: A report for the Pew Charitable Trusts. http://www.phd-survey.org.
- Hall, L., & Burns, L. (2009). Identity development and mentoring in doctoral education. Harvard Educational Review, 79(1), 49–70.Google Scholar
- Henkel, M. (2000). Academic identities and policy change in higher education. London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
- Kamler, B., & Thomson, P. (2006). Helping doctoral students write: Pedagogies for supervision. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- McAlpine, L., & Amundsen, C. (under review). Early career academic experience: The ups and downs of negotiating intentions. Journal of Higher Education. Google Scholar
- McAlpine, L., Paré, A., & Starke-Meyerring, D. (2008). Disciplinary voices: A shifting landscape for English doctoral education in the 21st century. In D. Boud & A. Lee (Eds.), Changing practices in doctoral education (pp. 42–53). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- McAlpine, L., Jazvac-Martek, M., & Hopwood, N. (2009). Doctoral student experience: Activities and difficulties influencing identity development. International Journal for Researcher Development, 1(1). http://www.researcherdevelopmentjournal.org/.
- McAlpine, L., Amundsen, C., & Jazvac-Martek, M. (in press). Living and imagining academic careers. In L. McAlpine & G. Akerlind (Eds.), Becoming an academic: International perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Neumann, A. (2009). An examination of the tenured mind professing to learn: Creating tenured lives and careers in the American research university. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Paré, A. (2010). Slow the presses: Concerns about premature publication. In C. Aitchison, B. Kamler, & A. Lee (Eds.), Publishing pedagogies for the doctorate and beyond (pp. 30–46). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Paré, A. (in press). Making sense of supervision: Deciphering feedback. In P. Thomson & M. Walker (Eds.), The Routledge doctoral student’s companion: Getting to grips with research in education and the social sciences. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Paré, A., Starke-Meyerring, D., & McAlpine, L. (2009). The dissertation as multi-genre: Many readers, many readings. In C. Bazerman, D. Figueiredo, & A. Bonini, (Eds.), Genre in a changing world (pp. 179–193). West Lafayette: Parlor and WAC Clearinghouse.Google Scholar
- Pichon, H. W. (2010). Transitioning into the Professoriate: The pursuit of power in the academy. Excellence in College Teaching, 21(1), 5–26.Google Scholar
- Yeates, M. (2003). Graduate student conundrum. University Affairs, 38–39.Google Scholar