Advertisement

Categorization of the Time Sequence of Events Leading to Substorm Onset Based on THEMIS All-Sky Imager Observations

  • Y. Nishimura
  • L.R. Lyons
  • S. Zou
  • V. Angelopoulos
  • S.B. Mende
Chapter
Part of the IAGA Special Sopron Book Series book series (IAGA, volume 3)

Abstract

The sequence of events leading to substorm auroral onset has been a long-standing issue in substorm research. Based on statistical studies using THEMIS all-sky imager data, we have recently reported evidence that most substorm onset events are preceded by a pre-onset auroral form which is a distinct north-south arc originating from an poleward boundary intensification (PBI) and reaches the auroral onset region just before onset. This onset sequence was found to be a repetitive process; it is detected in 84% of 249 events between November 2007 and April 2008. A high occurrence of PBIs (84%) emphasizes an abrupt flux transport across the open-closed field line as initiation of the onset sequence. Here we present a variation of the onset sequence we have previously reported and two less frequently observed types of onset time sequence: poleward boundary contact and Harang aurora deformation. While poleward boundary contact events also start with PBIs, the auroral oval width becomes much narrower (∼2° MLAT) prior to onset, indicating that the plasma sheet is thin and the nightside magnetic separatrix is located closer to the near-Earth onset region. Harang auroral deformation events are not associated with an observed PBI, but the equatorward portion of a pre-existing Harang aurora bends equatorward, which indicates a rapid convection change leading to onset. All of those three categories of events suggest that new plasma intrusion toward onset location changes the pressure profile in the near-Earth region and leads to onset instability.

Keywords

Plasma Sheet Magnetic Local Time Auroral Oval Substorm Onset Onset Location 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Science Foundation grants ATM-0646233 and ATM-0639312, NASA grant NNX07AF66, NASA contract NAS5-02099, and JSPS Research Fellowships for Young Scientists. Deployment of the THEMIS ASIs was partly supported by CSA contract 9F007-046101. Alaska magnetometer data were obtained from Geophysical Institute of University of Alaska, Fairbanks. NOAA satellite data were provided through the NOAA’s National Geophysical Data Center.

References

  1. Akasofu S-I (1964) The development of the auroral substorm. Planet Space Sci 12:273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angelopoulos V (2008) The THEMIS mission. Space Sci Rev 321:47Google Scholar
  3. Angelopoulos V et al (2008) Tail reconnection triggering substorm onset. Science 321:931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Birn J, Hesse M, Haerendel G, Baumjohann W, Shiokawa K (1999) Flow braking and the substorm current wedge. J Geophys Res 104:19895–19904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. de la Beaujardiere O et al (1994) Quiet-time intensifications along the poleward auroral boundary near midnight. J Geophys Res 99:287–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Donovan E et al (2008) Simultaneous THEMIS in situ and auroral observations of a small substorm. Geophys Res Lett 35:17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Elphinstone RD et al (1995) Observations in the vicinity of substorm onset: implications for the substorm process. J Geophys Res 100:7937–7969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Henderson et al (2002) The evolution of northsouth aligned auroral forms into auroral torch structures: the generation of omega bands and ps6 pulsations via flow bursts. In: Winglee RM (ed) Sixth international conference on substorms. University of Washington, Seattle, WA, pp 169–174Google Scholar
  9. Kepko L et al (2009) Equatorward moving auroral signatures of a flow burst observed prior to auroral onset. Geophys Res Lett 36(24):L24104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lyons LR, Nagai T, Blanchard GT, Samson JC, Yamamoto T, Mukai T, Nishida A, Kokobun S (1999) Association between Geotail plasma flows and auroral poleward boundary intensifications observed by CANOPUS photometers. J Geophys Res 104:4485–4500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lyons L, Nishimura Y, Shi Y, Kim H-J, Zou S, Heinselman C, Nicolls M, Angelopoulos V (2010) Substorm onset by earthward intrusion of new plasma: incoherent scatter radar observations. J Geophys Res 115(A7):A07223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Miyashita Y et al (2008) Response of large-scale ionospheric convection to substorm expansion onsets: a case study. J Geophys Res 113:A12309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Miyashita Y et al (2009) A state-of-the-art picture of substorm-associated evolution of the near-Earth magnetotail obtained from superposed epoch analysis. J Geophys Res 114(A13):1211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nakamura R et al (2001) Earthward flow bursts, auroral streamers, and small expansions. J Geophys Res 106:10791–10802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nishimura Y, Lyons L, Zou S, Angelopoulos V, Mende S (2010) Substorm triggering by new plasma intrusion: THEMIS all-sky imager observations. J Geophys Res 115(A7):A07222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rostoker G, Lui ATY, Anger CD, Murphree JS (1987) North-south structures in the midnight sector auroras as viewed by the Viking imager. Geophys Res Lett 14:407–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Samson JC, Lyons LR, Newell PT, Creutzberg F, Xu B (1992) Proton aurora and substorm intensifications. Geophys Res Lett 19:2167–2170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sergeev VA, Liou K, Meng C-I, Newell PT, Brittnacher M, Parks G, Reeves GD (1999) Development of auroral streamers in association with localized impulsive injections to the inner magnetotail. Geophys Res Lett 26:417–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sergeev VA et al (2000) Multiple-spacecraft observation of a narrow transient plasma jet in the Earth’s plasma sheet. Geophys Res Lett 27:851–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wolf RA, Wan Y, Xing X, Zhang J-C, Sazykin S (2009) Entropy and plasma sheet transport. J Geophys Res 114:A00D05CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Xing X, Lyons L, Nishimura Y, Angelopoulos V, Larson D, Carlson C, Bonnell J, Auster U (2010) Substorm onset by new plasma intrusion: THEMIS spacecraft observations. J Geophys Res 115(A10):A10246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Zesta E, Donovan E, Lyons L, Enno G, Murphree JS, Cogger L (2002) Twodimensional structure of auroral poleward boundary intensifications. J Geophys Res 107:1350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zou S et al (2009a) On the coupling between the Harang reversal evolution and substorm dynamics: a synthesis of SuperDARN, DMSP, and IMAGE observations. J Geophys Res 114:A01205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zou S, Lyons LR, Nicolls MJ, Heinselman CJ, Mende SB (2009b) Nightside ionospheric electrodynamics associated with substorms: PFISR and THEMIS ASI observations. J Geophys Res 114(114):A12301CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Y. Nishimura
    • 1
    • 2
  • L.R. Lyons
    • 1
  • S. Zou
    • 1
    • 3
  • V. Angelopoulos
    • 4
  • S.B. Mende
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Atmospheric and Ocean SciencesUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Solar-Terrestrial Environment LaboratoryNagoya UniversityFurocho, Chikusa, NagoyaJapan
  3. 3.Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space SciencesUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  4. 4.Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  5. 5.Space Science LaboratoryUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations